LogFAQs > #979003926

Antiyonder posted...

And frankly, maybe such a thought is morally wrong (If nothing else some venting), but I would just like to see a final election to guarantee LGBTQ+ rights (and maybe abortion).

Basically let the antis have their word, but if they choose to vote they agree to random a background check and inspection to prove their moral character. Failing to pass is pretty much a way to get around denying their votes. Random so there is no last minute evidence hiding.

As an added bonus, making said voters and their problems public.

Not sure I can agree with that, though you are definitely free to vent your view. I'm in favor of easier access to voting even if it is for the sack of shit dregs of society.

Though I can't argue I'm any morally better as living in the U.S. and seeing how right-wingers use free speech to cause one of the most disastrous political climates in a modernized western democracy has turned me against U.S. free speech in favor of more restricted speech centered around not spreading objective lies and/or spreading hatred towards marginalized and discriminated groups via stochastic terrorism.

Germany proved how strongly them outlawing pro-Nazi speech and iconography moved their nation forward, meanwhile in the U.S. we still have shitheads crying over the South's Lost Cause and promising it will rise again, currently promising a new civil war.

Living in this country is frustrating, to say the least.