| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Should religion alone really be deemed valid for outlawing something, |
| EPR-radar 02/12/24 6:22:37 PM #22: | Antiyonder posted...
And I feel if one professes to be attempting a ban for the good of God and kids everywhere, one would be willing to deal with an inconvenience to do so. Basically the political/adult equivalent of a kid doing extra chores for money beyond their usual allowance VS just getting what he/she/they want by demanding/begging/asking. There's a basic fallacy here. An anti-gay bigot is not entitled to inflict their views on other people no matter how they do on their own purity test. It's entertaining as hell in the 99.999+% of the time that they fail their purity test, but some bigot who actually passes the purity test is still just a bigot, and still doesn't get to tell me how to live. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984 ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |