LogFAQs > #978784983

Smallville posted...

Interesting had never heard of it. Sounds like it could be valid

It demonstrates one folly of the transition to green energy - we arent using less fossil fuels, were just using more energy as it becomes cheaper and more accessible, or otherwise sustaining BAU (business as usual)

Other problems involve time and resource consumption to overhaul infrastructure, further degradation of the environment, etc. Its not practical or sustainable, requiring more fossil fuels to build and maintain under our current systems. Its maintaining the status quo that got us into this mess in the first place.

We are already in overshoot - a population crash in the relative near future is unavoidable and this is demonstrated with physics.