LogFAQs > #978779139

Requiring technology and fossil fuels to maintain the current human population absolutely points to overpopulation. Like there is literally no argument, unless you somehow think any non-human spaces existing on Earth is proof that there aren't too many people yet. Which is an extremely short-sighted take.

To use an analogy, imagine a medicine where 1/4 cup is effective, 26-99% will cause varying degrees of negative side effects, and a full cup would be guaranteed deadly overdose. We're currently at 3/4 cup and tolerating the side effects, but y'all are claiming it's not a problem until we go beyond 99%...