Did you just simultaneously appeal to a tribalistic sense of property not existing and somehow declare that complex government bureaucracy of redistributing income to the poor was a natural state of affairs? Are those not completely and totally contradictory arguments?
Look, you can cloak it in all the mathematics and wordplay you want. The simple fact is that you are willing to steal money from someone to spend it on how you deem best fit. That is disgusting. You think it's morally acceptable for you to steal my property and give it to someone who "needs" it more (based on your definition of need or course, since there cannot ever be an objective definition of "need")? What about stealing my money to give to the dictators who rule over poor people in other countries? What about stealing my money to buy a predator drone with which to kill the poor people in other countries? When does it stop being a moral virtue and start being a moral crime?
What CAN'T the government steal my money for? Is there any limit?
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://img.imgcake.com/smartmuffin/barkleyjpgde.jpg
http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/