From: dragon22391 | #165
you know who never bought a generic gunner, and only had a few debatably-gunners the whole game and still owned all of you?
this guy
Debatably gunners my ass. Rudy was bought by you, end of discussion.
From: Gatarix | #167
Alas I was too honorable to deal with drak's 2 and a half year long plot to win mercs through lies and manipulation.
This from the guy who was documented trying to weasel out of his deals on multiple occasions.
I outmaneuvered you. That's all.
More like you outtanked him. Your chief ability isn't your wits, Drak - it's your grit. You're very clever, but you're even more of a determinator in the end.
From: Achromatic | #164
I was actually discussing that with HGR this morning. Voter restrictions are just bad. How about we foster a mercs where players are actually held accountable. Let them have to give reasons and let the reasons have to actually hold up to scrutiny. Let admins have power to openly question a vote and ask for more and more reasoning. If you are a player there is no reason for this not to be acceptable. The days of shady votes have to be over, frankly.
Problem: We get a single Wanglike admin and it all goes to hell. I know, I know, 'get better admins', but this means you're asking the admins to not be biased AND play even more than the players, two highly taxing requests.
--
Current Projects: Fool's Overture, CYOA: http://tinyurl.com/4y5ysx8
Sburbopolis, Homestuck RPG: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/60206251