JeffreyRaze posted...
Greyfield, he's arguing that both of them should bear equal responsibility. He wants to change the laws, just like you do. Stop it.
Anyways, I don't hold that conception is a viable dividing line between human/non-human. I don't feel that potential humans have any intrinsic value, which is where the real difference in our views is I guess.
First, please spell my name right.
Second, I'm trying to make a point about men's rights concerning pregnancy based on the current laws. Circumventing the argument by trying to change the entire framework of the argument isn't constructive or conducive to a civil argument.
If he wants to argue the right/wrong of abortion, that's fine. But that's not what I'm concerned with right now, and if he wants to refute my opinions, he should keep within the framework of the argument, not create his own new argument that has no basis in reality.
--
PSN - Aevio
BlackMageJawa - "I'm on a Goomba."