From: Sorozone | #336
I've only actively argued and voted in 4-5 of the matches.
That was the last match I argued in, so I'm bringing it up as an example of his hypocritical-ness. Is it really hard to understand? I haven't followed every single match.
I have no qualms with the characters I argued for losing, but when one loses because of non-explained votes are not counted, and thus a mercy rule is put into effect before argument even actually started, and another one loses with non-explained votes being counted against him, there is a problem to be had.
It's up to his discretion on what he thinks what constitutes as a troll vote and what doesn't. That's understandable. He has the authority to discount any vote, but when the argument was so in favor of Buu, and votes are not discounted for GANON it's a problem. Why? Because even if people legitimately thought GANON would win(which seems to be the case) those votes were counted. Ok cool. Than why is it when people vote for Goku who legitimately thought he could win were discounted? What's wrong with legitimately thinking any character can win anything? Nothing.
So why were one votes counted and another wasn't and went to a mercy? What does it mean to be a troll vote? Because those people have a post on voting for an underdog and continually do it? Because those people legitimately thought they could win, even with the argument or no argument to begin with was against that character?
It all comes down to his discretion like I said, but when it's inconsistent(from what I've seen) it's just a mess.
Then again, this could just be an issue of my ignorance.