LogFAQs > #272703

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Saw Green Lantern tonight
KimPilgrim 08/29/11 7:53:00 PM #7:	I did enjoy it. But it wasn't even 1/5 as good as it should have been considering the source material. I mean, the movie spent 45 minutes dicking around on earth with build up, and then spent the majority of the remaining movie there, too. And it cost $300 Million. You'd think considering the cost it would have given us this: But no, the director "didn't like big battles, wanted it to be more personal". sigh -- ~LtM http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/Kim.png <cite>KimPilgrim posted [p:272703] in Saw Green ... [t:60172294]...</cite> <quote> I did enjoy it. But it wasn't even 1/5 as good as it should have been considering the source material.I mean, the movie spent 45 minutes dicking around on earth with build up, and then spent the majority of the remaining movie there, too. And it cost $300 Million. You'd think considering the cost it would have given us this:But no, the director "didn't like big battles, wanted it to be more personal".sigh -- ~LtMhttp://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/Kim.png </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1