Lurker > kangolcone

I have two and dont want anymore.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a person who shares Nazi ideals. (Clarification provided exclusively for Revelation34 who was having trouble distinguishing context)

There was a loose thread on the arm of my shirt today. I cut it off with some scissors and threw it into the trash. Goodbye, Thread.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a person who shares Nazi ideals. (Clarification provided exclusively for Revelation34 who was having trouble distinguishing context)

kangolcone posted...

Still gonna win the gold in all likelihood

US still gonna win the gold in all likelihood.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a person who shares Nazi ideals. (Clarification provided exclusively for Revelation34 who was having trouble distinguishing context)

Revelation34 posted...

I changed my signature so that you could more easily understand. Hope that its helpful.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a person who shares Nazi ideals. (Clarification provided exclusively for Revelation34 who was having trouble distinguishing context)

Far-Queue posted...

I don't know how people are getting so drawn into the Waning King Vortex of Ignorance

At some point you gotta realize there's no talking sense to a moron of that magnitude

Im not seeking sense. Im asking for him to put into words which piece of Nazi ideology or their political platform he thinks is worthy of discussion.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Clench281 posted...

I'm confused because isn't every vote based on your feelings..? You are voting for what the rules of your society should be. Those decisions are based on you weighing the importance of perceived value.

Which is just a more verbose way of saying "voting with your feelings."

You gotta remember that many men who ascribe to the values of Shapiros and Petersons are devoid of any emotion and only make decisions based on logic and factual information.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Revelation34 posted...

Nazi is an acronym of National Socialist German Workers' Party or to be even more specific since that's a translation: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. What you linked isn't the actual Nazi party.

That's perfectly normal to say. Hell even @LinkPizza says it.

I literally provided you a link to the platform. I can also give you various pages which will help you to better understand their ideology.

Im still not sure why you think ideas die or that people are unable to hold beliefs because a country lost a war.

Edit: And if this is the case, then all my signature is doing is advocating against people who fought against the US. Oh damn, thats really something I shouldnt be saying according to you.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

I can't help that you guys are unable or unwilling to read and think, that's your own issue.

Nope, when multiple people are having an issue, its on your end. Nobody else has yet to come in and say I know what part of Nazi ideology RK supports for discussion. Now two other people have come in asking the same question because you didnt answer it clearly and are becoming increasingly mad about it.

Therefore, which piece of Nazi ideology or their political platform do you consider to be worthy of discussion?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

adjl posted...

I don't have the answer to that question, and I'm pretty curious. Care to repeat it for those of us that missed the first pass?

wydrah posted...

Can you just answer it? I can't find it, and you're coming off like a shy Nazi simp

It would seem your answer is not as clear as you believe. Please, just go ahead and identify the piece of Nazi ideology or political platform that you view as worthy of discussion.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

See here's the thing though, you literally already have the answer to that question you keep repeating ad nausaem. You're being obtuse or trying to get me modded, that or you seriously need every little thing spelled out for you in the simplest way possible which means you shouldn't even be having this discussion in the first place.

Why would you get modded if the ideology of the Nazi party has something worth discussing? You could also send me a private message.

And yes, I would like for you to directly spell out which part of the Nazi political platform or ideology you view as worthy of discussion.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Literally acting like a child deliberately trying to annoy an adult. I shouldn't be surprised that it's coming from someone who thinks might makes right, I really should stop wasting my time on cases like his.

The only thing deliberate here is your avoidance of a direct question.

If you find the questions annoying, I would not ask it again if you answered. You have said you view Nazis as having valid political view points worthy of discussion. Im simply seeking to explore which parts of Nazi ideology you feel are worthy of discussion and defense.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

You really have trouble following posts don't you? If you were paying attention you wouldn't have to keep asking that worthless question.

Ok, which piece of Nazi ideology or the political platform do you consider worthy of debate?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Revelation34 posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79594424?page=3#38

theres also this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nazi_Party?wprov=sfti1

And yes, I know the officially disbanded in the 80s, but it sure shoots a hole right through your 1945 horse assery.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Revelation34 posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/79594424?page=3#38

Right, again, the party losing doesnt mean their political platform no longer exists nor does it mean there arent people who ascribe to it.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-party-platform

I can do all sorts of googling to better educate you if need be.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

You don't need to give me any chances, you've done a better job at proving how close minded you are with every post than I could hope to.

And there you go ignoring most of my post because you can't tackle it. Also lol at "false strawman" as apposed to what, a true strawman?

Ok, so which piece of Nazi ideology or political platform do you view as worthy of debate?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Revelation34 posted...

Then what's the point of your sig if the Nazi party was disbanded in 1945?

I was unaware that ideology and platform ceased to exist because a country lost a war. Lmfao. Is your point really that you think Nazis and people who believe Nazi ideology no longer exist?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Ehh why bother having a discussion when I can just say "Well my dad would beat up your dad" like a 2nd grader and leave it at that?

Im giving you an opportunity to show the world how closed minded I am. Please tell me which part of the Nazi ideology and political platform you view as worthy of discussion.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Great to know that you think if you can physically over power someone or some nation with acts of violence that is a better way to invalidate their beliefs than rational debate. Also your insistence on calling the wide spread violence, looting, and civil unrest "property crime" to try to sugar coat it is very telling.

Anyways:

Like I said, I do not view the tenants of the Nazi party as worthy of debate. The people who engaged in political discourse with the Nazi party ended up with their countrys Capital being firebombed.

Im sorry that your lack of history knowledge led you to believe that the Nazi party has a history of openness where they peacefully coexist along the political spectrum.

I would be interested to know which ideals the Nazis hold which you do believe would make for good discourse.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Just because you are incapable of following a proper conversation thread doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about. Do yourself a favor and reread my posts from the beginning if you want to stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense, I literally already covered the point you're trying to "get me" with.

Also bravo on not even bothering to try to deny the implications of your sig, I'm glad you can be truthful about that even if the truth isn't a good one.

I do not view the Nazi party as a valid political platform. We fought an entire war about it. However, in no way does my political alignment, negate that I literally made factual statements.

You said its bad that nobody did this for property crime over the summer. Then when pointed out that more than 10,000 arrests were made, you complained about sentencing. We do not know Mr Taakes sentence yet, we only know of his arrest. Therefore your first complaint about no woman using a dating app to find people guilty of property crime is not at all related to the sentencing guidelines laid out by the US legal system.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

rexcrk posted...

u ok?

Have you seen their other posts? Clearly not.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

The point of exposing criminal behavior is to have said criminal arrested AND charged with the appropriate crime and if found guilty given an appropriate sentence. Do you think this women would have wasted her time doing something like this if she knew that the guy would just be released the next day? Obviously the two are connected, I can't believe I have to point this out to you. Again just spouting off "well some rioter were arrested..." is a worthless statement since the whole point is supposed to be what comes after the arrest.

You really have the audacity to claim you don't have a political bias here despite that disgusting sig you have? Right, someone who thinks violence is an acceptable substitute for debate wouldn't have a problem with violent looters and thugs "on their side" getting away with their crimes with nothing but a mere arrest I suppose.

So then the issue you have is that property crime is not viewed with the same sentencing guidelines as invasion of a federal building and assault on law enforcement. That has nothing to do with this woman identifying people nor lack of use of dating apps to have people who committed property crimes arrested. Again, you dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

An arrest without prosecution is obviously not the same thing as being charged with a crime, you bring up the number of arrests was pointless in the first place. Also pointless is you implying that I was implying this woman had anything to do with sentencing or that I even take issue with her. Way to reveal your posts are fueled by a political agenda, sorry but mine are based on justice and morality so I doubt we'll see eye to eye on this.

You said, why didnt people do this for the property damage of last summer. Then you brought up sentencing. Those are entirely unrelated. Thats why I felt the need to let you know she doesnt control sentencing because clearly you conflate the two in this topic.

Nor once has a political agenda come through as they are all factual statements in my previous posts. Are you saying facts are political?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

And how many of those arrests resulted in substantial charges instead of people spending a night or two in jail and then being cut loose? How often did the media decry the chaos and put the names and faces of the criminals in headlines?

Moving the goal posts again I see. The woman here actually isnt in control of sentencing at all. So even if similar actions had been taken to identify the people over the summer, they would not then have changed either the charges then or now. Nor would it have changed sentencing outcomes.

You dont even know what you are pretending to be mad at.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Be careful man, at that rate, you will be dead in less than 5 years.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

In one of the Harry Potter movies, Rons Dad asks Harry what is the purpose of a rubber duck to try and figure out humans a little better.

This place is like that scene sometimes.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Zeus posted...

Depends on your definition of entrapment? afaik, the legal definition involves law enforcement enticing civilians to break the law so they can arrest them for breaking the law. You might be able to extend that to people working with law enforcement to do the exact same thing, or even people working on their own do it, but... he'd already done the crime?

What she did was scummy (because trolling dating sites is inherently scummy, and there were likely a lot of guys she fucked with to conduct her amoral interrogations), but I don't think it was entrapment.

I would actually be pretty curious to see the legal rationale for the entrapment argument.

She used her free time to help capture criminals and you call her scummy.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Now if only people had done this sort of thing for the rioters who burned down businesses, vandalized property, and looted anything not nailed down across most of the major cities of the country last summer.

There were more than 10,000 arrests as a result of the property crime you are talking about last summer.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Its pretty obvious. Vaccinated people were more concerned about with virus, its why they got the vaccination.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

I get it. But you have a few things going for you. As somebody said, creepy weirdos do not recognize their creepy weirdness or do it intentionally. You are neither so thats a good start.

Im just tired of Mike Pence like men saying they cant be in a room with a woman alone. Thats weird. Most women arent interested in your wiener. Dont make weird comments about how they look or dress. Dont touch them too long or too much. Ya know, all the stuff you probably do with your male coworkers.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Zeus posted...

Considering that recording one-on-one meetings isn't a terribly unusual practice, that doesn't really factor into anything. And keep in mind performance evaluations very frequently come into lawsuits (and was a major part in BOTH of the lawsuits I almost got stuck serving jury duty for).

But, in general, there are a LOT of workplaces where most conversations are recorded. Even some white collar jobs go way overboard with recording devices, and I don't even mean hedge funds like Bridgewater.

All of your posts are weird and alarming.

Im going to need a source for there are a lot of places where most conversations are recorded. You presenting unsubstantiated anecdotes about the number of industries and employers who engage in this practice is not convincing. Moreover, hes never even specified what industry he is in therefore your claim is even more of an assumption. He never mentioned this as part of a performance review. He simply said he doesnt talk to her or seek her feedback.

You are speaking of businesses and industries where that is standard practice. If that isnt the case for his job and industry, I again reiterate being the only person in a company to demand all your conversations are recorded would be wildly alarming.

Lastly, if you have to resort to personal attacks, thats fine. Im sorry you cant just have a discussion without insults.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Zeus posted...

I'm trying to think of one place where it's illegal to let somebody know that the conversation will be recorded, but I can't think of your fantasyland. However, I look forward to your batshit crazy idea that cops are busting down doors of companies that say "This call may be monitored or recorded..."

I can only guess that you're stupidly conflating it with somebody *not* knowing that they're being recorded, which is the exact opposite of what I said. Because otherwise you're suggesting that every security camera is the world is breaking the law because... you know, it's so much easier just to call your shitpost stupid.

Lmfao. So the best way for this guy to convince people he isnt a creepy weirdo, in your opinion, is to start telling people that he records all his conversations.

Because thats not weird and alarming.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

A song about a couple trying to cheat on each other. Classic.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

DrPrimemaster posted...

This seems to have really struck a chord with you, would you have rather I never bring this up and try to fix it? I dont understand why trying to correct mistakes gets so much backlash.

I work in an environment with almost exclusively female coworkers. I have supervised female interns and female employees. Never once has something even remotely come up like this. And I dont know what mistake you are making since apparently she isnt the only person you dont talk to.

I see it (maybe you arent, but some of the responses lean this way) as just another way to blame the victim because she might think Im a creep and accuse me of something. My suggestion, from a decade of working with women, dont be a creep and they wont accuse you of being a creep.

I do think its a relevant question though. Would you let fear of being called a racist keep you from interacting with a black coworker/supervisee/teammate?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

faramir77 posted...

This sounds like an underlying personal issue for you, TC. Some kind of anxiety or something. You might want to look into that.

I wonder if he also avoids speaking to black people for fear they think hes a racist.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Zeus posted...

She's a she? That means she's a she! And that means...

idk, in the age of #MeToo, any 1-on-1 interaction between a male boss and female worker is fraught with peril, so your reluctance is perhaps a little understandable. You can probably get around them -- and the idea that you're treating anybody differently -- by recording the conversations, so people are less likely to try something if they get a performance review they dislike and want to get even or something.

>_>

Depending on where he lives, you have just instructed this person to commit a crime.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

I would be very careful with how you proceed. While I understand your hesitation (I actually really dont because I work 1 on 1 with women all the time and have never had a problem), but what you are actually doing is discriminating against her because of her sex/gender. Seeking input and feedback from men while ignoring the only woman is not a good idea.

Also, why would she think you are creepy? Are you a creep? Do you say weird shit to women in the work place?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

faramir77 posted...

You say that in a world where Simple Plan exists

Coldplay would like a word.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

MartianManchild posted...

Sad day for freedom. Another step toward fascism that far too many people are blindly accepting with open arms.

Its not facism. None of the jobs are compulsory employment. Unvaccinated people who choose not to undergo testing are welcome to quit and find employment elsewhere.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Its a phrase that dates back to gold mining.

Workers were lowered downward so they could use dynamite to make a big hole in the ground bigger and deeper. Not very safe.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

What part is supposed to be weird?

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Republicans have spent the last 4 decades stripping rights from workers and giving employers almost sole discretion about work requirements.

Now they are mad that employers are making requirements for workers.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

From the moment you are born, yes. Decay and entropy are part of life.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Properly cooked bacon > sausage > improperly cooked bacon.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Well you're closer to the top than the bottom as far as poster on this board go but compared to me that still isn't enough so I wouldn't call it pretending. You see I'm the type of guy who only really offers his opinions and knowledge on subjects he's confident about. If I'm clueless about something, which I am on many things, I simply won't discuss it. Can you imagine how much better the world would be if everyone was like that?

Your first sentence needs a comma after well and is a run-on sentence. Your second sentence needs a comma after You see and the word really is unnecessary. You either offer your opinions or you dont. Please fix for accuracy and clarity.

You havent engaged in this topic to offer any meaningful opinion or statement of substance. Instead, you repeatedly engage in bad faith arguments centered around pedantry.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

adjl posted...

That doesn't need a question mark, actually. Depending on how it's being said, one might be appropriate, but given the phrasing here, it's not so much a matter of asking if I know as it is telling me that I should be considering something I already know.

If hes phrasing it as something that you already are aware of, it should be as you know. Its usage is unclear and we must strive for absolutely clarity in all messages related to COVID-19. The very fact that you interpret the intonation of the last two words differently than I do illustrates the need for him to clean up the post.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Comparing grammar to deliberately spreading fake news that could have lethal consequences? Yeah ok, I've confirmed exactly what kind of poster you are.

Im not comparing anything. I didnt mention the other post in the post you quoted, at all, which would be required for comparison. Im simply asking that you use proper sentence structure around this topic. As you put it, lives are on the line (you missed a comma here) you know (and a question mark here)

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

So they aren't 100% effectively and don't guarantee someone won't contract or die from covid, got it. You should word your posts more carefully to avoid spreading misinformation on this very important topic, lives are on the line you know.

This post has multiple run sentences. Please fix for clarity and accuracy.


---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

inb4 the people who claim to be the good guys in this situation come in to gloat over someone getting unlucky and dying

Excuse me sir. This sentence does not start with a capital letter and there is no punctuation. Please fix for clarity and accuracy.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

I shouldn't have to mentally cover over your misinformation, you shouldn't have posted it in the first place. Other people skimming the topic might have been tricked by it if I hadn't called you out. The right thing for you to do would be to edit the post yourself.

Also I'll call you out on your "w-w-well if you round up a percent..." bs because that isn't true either.

Your first sentence is a run-on. Please fix for clarity and accuracy.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.

Reigning_King posted...

Maybe read the relevant posts before inserting yourself into a reply chain next time.

I know you are a troll engaging in bad faith arguments for reasons unknown, but engaging in pedantic arguments doesnt really make a strong case. It just kind of makes you look like a goof who cant respond to the topic so you pick word choice.

For the record since February, 9000 people have died in Texas from Covid. 43 were fully vaccinated.

Ill have to be on the lookout now, knowing how hard of a time you have understanding minor hyperbole.

---

Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi.