Lurker > daynlokki

HHH is the game posted...

I noticed the positive case rate has been HUGELY up the past week or two to a RIDICULOUS amount, but the amount of deaths has been constant the entire time, even when the case rate was much lower. Is that because they are testing more, or because it takes a couple weeks for the death rate to spike after the positive test rate spikes?

Averaging death rates lag 2-3 weeks behind as that how long an average hospital stay with covid is.

FunnyPies posted...

It's a pandemic. The virus doesn't give a shit about your politics. Why the hell is this even political to begin with?

Its politicized because originally Trump thought it wasnt going to be so bad, maybe around H1N1 at worst and so he grossly downplayed it. Having already done so and with the inability to say hes done anything wrong he now cant walk that back and still have a chance at re-election. He painted himself into a corner and its leading to more deaths.

SpudForce posted...

Any competent defense attorney is going to beat this murder charge.

Maybe until they stood over his body for a full two minutes and the guy kicked him that could have been the case. That time lapse 100% factored into his death and refusing to give care is easily murder in that situation.

Damn_Underscore posted...

Or "the burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim"

This is a great line to use in an internet argument, but it has no meaning. This is the exact reason why not everyone is an atheist. There is no proof of there being no god, and therefore people will naturally be inspired by things within the universe and/or see those things as proof for themselves for themselves that there is a god.

So while a debate consisting of

Atheist: "There is no proof of a god existing"
Religious person: "There is no proof of a god not existing"
Atheist: "The burden of proof is on you for making the original claim"

may be a rhetorical "win" for the atheist, nothing will result from this debate. If you think the world would be better if everyone was an atheist, this rebuttal is never going to make anyone an atheist. And the statement "there is no proof of a god not existing" is basically the reason why not everyone is going to be an atheist (as mentioned before, the reason why people are specifically religious is that they find proofs/evidence for themselves in whatever religion they believe in).

You cannot definitively prove something doesnt exist. You can however prove when something does.

imagine606 posted...

You don't have to worry about that for a while. Mods did their jobs well.

He lasted almost 20 hours this time

Guesswho hasnt said anything racist? From another post I believe:

#73
Supporting your own race is natural. Just as the protesters are making things about theirs (even though the Floyd case was not about race). What's not naturla is actual bad acts against races.

guesswho33 posted...

You mean they say there were no break ins. Doesn't make it fact.

Nice try. Nothing I said was racist.

No I mean that not one break in was reported and every neighbor has stated there werent even rumors. Sooooo, any proof there was an actual break in or is it only OK for you to believe what someone says as there is no actual verifiable truth to the break in conspiracy. Youre point blank being hypocritical believing what someone says, but then saying everyone else cant believe what a much larger group is saying...

guesswho33 posted...

Oh I can. But you are being intentionally ridiculous to ask for it after they did it every day. And now Maddow lied that some company was run by Russians and of course a cherry picked judge tossed it. You 100% know they have accused him of collusion and pretending you don't is just dumb. Nobody buys it.

So can but you wont lmao.

Bananana posted...

This guesswho33 jokester has really come out of the woodwork the past couple days. Whose alt is he?

Not an alt. He just got out of purg will be there again soon with his racial rants elsewhere

guesswho33 posted...

First off words are never proof of anything. Second, I said robberies in teh area, not some one specific house.

And they have already debunked this as nobody in the area had a break in

guesswho33 posted...

There doesn't NEED to be a link to sources because it's common knowledge, even on the LEFT, that they have accused him of collusion for 4 years and it was proven false. I don't need to link to a source that they accused him of that. You're ridiculous. That's like saying to prove that people need water to live. Everyone already knows it's fact, except apparently you.

So you cant actually link sources.

UnholyMudcrab posted...

And just like that, I know that nothing this guy ever posts will be worth reading

Same guy said Foxnews is left leaning about a month ago after they disagreed with Trump.

guesswho33 posted...

I don't know. I just did it over time. Basically someone had made me an app and he was unavailable to add more features so I looked at his files and figured out which code did what. Just by that and reading a bit of documentation on the forum software site, I think I was able to make my own big app within a couple months. Then that software company vastly changed their code up and I had to actually learn more about coding because their documentation was so lacking. I basically asked so many questions to the developers that they started getting really annoyed with me, but I finally understand it...

Bullshit

guesswho33 posted...

I make apps (for a particular software, not for app stores on mobile devices) and I basically learned by looking at examples, ie learned informally.... so I really should take some classes at some point or at least read some manuals.

Good to know youve been lying about your degree on here like everyone has been saying for years.

guesswho33 posted...

which was my point... the cop did not intentionally do that.

The cop 100% intentionally did that.

Tenlaar posted...

You literally quoted me saying that arresting peaceful protesters is wrong. Nothing in your post changes the fact that the tweet in the OP gave no information beyond "a person wearing scrubs was arrested" and that's all that I said. Stop projecting whatever it is you're projecting on me right now.

So you cannot back up your point so must attempt to begin finger pointing because it was factually wrong. Good to know.

Romes187 posted...

gotta define bad

someone who would murder or rape someone? Probably less than 10%

someone who steals, or wants to watch the world burn? Probably less than 10%

someone who disagrees with me? 50%

imo 50% is the number

Well lets see if you add all the people killing, stealing and overall just being bad people in the eyes of the law Id think 10-15% is the overall total. He didnt state they were all bad people for doing the exact same thing...

Tenlaar posted...

Yeah yeah, I know, I'm a bootlicker for wanting to know more than "a person wearing scrubs was arrested." Arresting peaceful protesters is wrong whether they're wearing scrubs or not and somebody wearing scrubs can throw a brick the same as anybody else.

So do you have proof he did anything wrong or are you just assuming anyone arrested during peaceful protests is automatically a thug purely because they were arrested. Not one officer has erroneously arrested anyone during this right? Like say news crews or people literally kneeling with their hands up.

Tenlaar posted...

This gives absolutely no information about what actually happened and why they were arrested, wearing scrubs doesn't make somebody immune to arrest if they're doing something illegal while wearing them.

Notice you arent continuing this line of reasoning now that someone showed the police report.

guesswho33 posted...

Because I believe people said there were robberies in the neighborhood lately and they see someone running down the street. Was racial bias involved? Maybe. But they probably did legit think he did it.

People incarcerated aren't supposed to equal the percentages they make up in population... It's whoever did the crimes. Also I wonder if when they say the sentences are longer if they are keeping out that they were repeat offenders or something. I am not saying they definitely are, but I know the feminist movement has them comparing salaries of genders for differing situations and making it look bad.

Also I didn't belittle anything other than the media for misrepresenting facts.

There were no robberies and that has been proven... racism at its best folks

guesswho33 posted...

It's really a waste of time believing so-called "experts" at this point. Notice now they say the peak of the virus will be November. lol. this after they kept saying May, then June. They clearly don't know anything and just guess, wrong more often than weather reports.

Well the actual peak of most major pandemics is after the SECOND spike. First round with the Spanish flu killed about 5m worldwide. 2nd go round killed 50m.

abaddon41_80 posted...

It is okay to have the hypothesis that people not following social distancing guidelines is probably going to result in a higher infection rate but, so far, the data does not seem to support that hypothesis. We won't really know if relaxed social distancing led to a higher infection rate for another month, at least. Even if there is an increase in the infection rate, which I do not believe there will be, we will not be able directly attribute that as the cause.

The data doesnt support that because the states controlling the data arent reporting truthfully. The data didnt support human to human transmission per the WHO at the beginning of this, probably because China had the only data, much like the states control their own.

guesswho33 posted...

Keeo telling yourself that NY has so many cases becuase of more tests done. lol. You're literally the only person on the planet to think that florida has as many deaths as them. That's literally tin foil hat level of conspiracy theory.

So you arent believing that more people are infected than have been testing? So you honestly think only 1.5m of our 330m in population have covid currently?

guesswho33 posted...

You sure are interested in my life. But anyway perfectly legal to only date 18-20 yos even if you're 100.

Never said it was illegal once. Whered you pull that out of your ass?

guesswho33 posted...

yet when people bring up how poorly Cuomo has handled NY, your side says "of course they have more cases, they have tested more". In fact, hilariously daynlokki claimed that NY has way more DEATHS that Florida because Florida hasn't tested as many people. Like testing live people affects the death toll. lol.

Well it does when you dont test ANY dead people. Think about this. Only people who have tested positive for Covid in Florida can count as covid deaths (they need to test positive of course). So if you arent testing people, and those untested people are dying, not one of them will be considered a covid case because there is no positive test, not because everyone one of these people dont have covid. People are dying at home from pneumonia (which covid causes), while having other covid symptoms and being told to shelter in place by a physician, but because they were never tested these are not considered covid deaths. So yes, under testing of covid itself will lead to an undercount of deaths. Thats common sense math.

@guesswho33

SauI_Goodman posted...

do you only go after girls that are verified or do you go after any girls? you're not afraid of getting catfished by a fat guy pretending to be a girl ?

First step, add to Snapchat. Second step. Have them send you a live picture, not one saved into camera roll.

guesswho33 posted...

Some really hot girl from there wanted to meet me, but I didn't do it. Eh or actually I think it was a diff site. OKC usually gave sooooooo few results when I had it only look for girls 18-20.

Suuuuuure. This the one where you couldnt meet because of your diarrhea? Also, creepy to be looking at 18-20 when you posted elsewhere you watched quantum leap as it aired. Last episode aired in 1993. Even if you were just born watching it you are essentially searching for someone at least 10 years younger who is barely legal. Gross man.

guesswho33 posted...

I see you conveniently aren't saying anything about you and carbon's claim that almost everyone thinks botw is a topnotch Zelda game, yet almost everyone in here is saying otherwise. Just shows that the only people you and carbon can get to agree with you are people from the game's own board and then sue that misleading biased group of people to claim something.

I see you conveniently side stepped someone else calling you out for saying you finished BoTW when you definitely didn't. Trolling.

guesswho33 posted...

Nope. I have played through every official console Zelda and botw is my least favorite by far. I have even played a few handheld ones and like those all more also. Zelda games need legit dungeons and a Zelda feel to them.

Well this is a lie. You've said several times you haven't even finished BoTW. You've also said you don't consider any handheld game a Zelda game.

guesswho33 posted...

I don't think a single person in here said botw was their fav Zelda game, so yep.... the majority agreed with me that it's not the best.

So you didn't read the comments of the 2 people on page one? Reported for trolling.

CarbonButtflap posted...

God your shtick is tired.

Always claims to be the majority, never had anyone back him up. Weird majority.

Resaix posted...

Do they arrest minorities disproportionately?

No they arrest minorities reportedly.

AvantgardeAClue posted...

Tell me why someone new to Final Fantasy (which Id imagine make up a big part of the target audience) should buy this game and NOT expect to defeat Sephiroth by the end.

And I dont mean some apparition or fake Sephiroth either, in case the remake does have that.

Not every person buying this game does extensive research on the games they buy. Maybe it has a nice cover or they saw an ad. Hell I know one guy buying it because its a PS4 exclusive, despite not realizing itll be on Xbox next year lol

Probably because hes really only teased at the end of the game now. Hes teased as an overarching villain for multiple installations. Its easy enough. Dont bring him up until the end. Have it be mysterious so you get hyped for the next game because maybe youd get to really face him there. First time people will probably like this version more than they would the original with all the plot holes filled. I mean the largest and most technologically advanced city who is home to the original villain in the series (Shinra) you play for maybe 10 hours in then its mostly completely forgotten.