Lurker > azuarc

I apologize for asking this, but could you provide a short summary?

• Youtube takes down the channel, which is part of a network of 39 channels in different languages
• All hell breaks lose in Russia, claiming this is American propaganda and politically motivated
• Russia strongarms Google into reinstating the channel; Google caves
• From that point forward, Google subtlety works to support RT against BC despite BC doing everything to work within the law and Google's own system
• RT files counterclaims for the DMCA strikes, and Google says "welp, kay then. We dunno who's right" and uses that as a shield to hide behind, leaving the channel up until BC can win in court -- which is explicitly not what the DMCA law states
• RT won't work things out and thought they would just go away. In email exchanges they literally admit they only counterfiled to prevent the channel being banned. BC is forced to file in court.
• BC also ends up filing suit against Google, who is supposed to maintain neutrality, but is doing all they can to support RT, including attempting to arbitrate, having their lawyers talk to the judges on behalf of RT, and creating covert rule changes that allow RT to need 35 (!) copy-right strikes to be taken down.
• Due to the legal blockade, this goes on for almost two years and costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. During this, both RT and Google are evidently trying to exhaust BC into giving up.
• The initial date in court against RT comes, and their motion to dismiss along laughable grounds (mostly concerning fair use) is denied. So the real court battle will go through.
• The initial hearing against Google comes, but their lawyers lie their ass off about the circumstances and use a bazillion red herrings and misdirections -- which BC includes at the end of the video by talking through their argument and how absurd it was in actuality -- but Google gets the case against them dismissed.

A chicken you have to fight every time you want to drive your car.

I love just scrolling around a park, just staring at it. I LOVE GRIDS.

ROLF!

(Warning: Take this ranking with a grain of salt, because I played this game with friends and family, which is always a blast, even with a bad game.)

the forests were too strong this year

It is a beautiful disaster of an experiment

Super Mario Bros. is the best aged game from the generation

Is this Diablo III? I don't recognize it. Doesn't look like Diablo.

No way at least for Zelda. A modern day player should still be able to find a 3-5 dungeons and feel like they progressed a bit before giving up.

Final Fight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0uZ3omOAik

Oh, I'm not sure if this is the problem you ran into, but I have a very related complaint:

There is a huge problem with the onboarding process for all Mario Kart games, starting with Double Dash. That problem is this: drifting is required to play most of the tracks, and yet, the game does not explain drifting whatsoever.

It's one of the dumbest things I've ever seen in AAA games, that they don't explain how important drifting is in MK8. You literally just run into the wall on most turns, if you don't know about drifting.

And yet there's no reason to expect it would be important. Most racing games don't hard-require drifting, in my experience. So you would think a "super-casual-friendly" one certainly wouldn't require it either.

Day 79 Results!

Two Planets Approach the Roche Limit 24 v 31 Prophecy
-[PROTEASE]- 31 v 20 Suite Photoconductivity

Interesting that GGG is doing so well! I wouldve sworn it got too overplayed over the years to be worth anything here.

This is mainly here for the part that got me hooked on the game: the single player adventures they were designing, during the 2010s, such as "Blackrock Mountain", "Naxxramas", "Karazhan", etc....I somehow don't care about the real game's gameplay very much, or the balance. It's interesting or whatever.