Lurker > Nelson_Mandela

TheRock1525 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

You know what would really minimize civilian casualties?

If we didn't do our damndest to make the refugee process fucking miserable and actually helped people get out of awful countries.

Agreed. I'm pro-refugee

Fuck yeah, bring more of them over they learn how awesome America is.

100% this. I'd find it hard to believe someone can be radicalized against America after watching Fate of the Furious in IMAX.
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Ok.

I think it's idiotic to believe that many of the policies you advocate are in the best interests of the people.

But if you truly believe that is the best way to save them from ISIS, however delusional that belief my be, than I take back my statement about you having no regard for innocent life.

Thank you for admitting defeat
---

Free SephG

DeathChicken posted...

Frankly I do not trust this administration to reliably aim at North Korea and not hit South Korea by mistake because geography is hard

Trump's SecDef and new NSA are literally the most capable the nation has had since WWII
---

Free SephG

Nelson_Mandela posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

You know what would really minimize civilian casualties?

If we didn't do our damndest to make the refugee process fucking miserable and actually helped people get out of awful countries.

Agreed. I'm pro-refugee

That being said I don't think Trump is a monster for the attempted ban. He's legitimately doing what he thinks will keep Americans safe and less filled with anxiety. He just happens to be misguided.
---

Free SephG

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

Or does being pro-war vs ISIS or a brutal dictator automatically make me evil?

of course not, but that's not what you said in that post. "i'm thirsty for a new war" implies that your mentality is "PLEASE GIVE A WAR TO SATISFY MY BLOODLUST DON'T CARE WHO WE'RE BOMBING." if you'd said "i want the US to fight ISIS or a brutal dictator" nobody would have given a shit.

You have a pretty sick mind if that's how you interpret that sentence
---

Free SephG

TheRock1525 posted...

You know what would really minimize civilian casualties?

If we didn't do our damndest to make the refugee process fucking miserable and actually helped people get out of awful countries.

Agreed. I'm pro-refugee
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.

And then you come here to wish death upon those who don't share your views.

I've only wished death upon ISIS but thanks for slandering my character

But you have no concern for the innocents that die as collateral damage?

I think I've clearly demonstrated that minimizing civilian deaths is a priority for me and at the very least have showed more than "no concern."

Thoughts?

Nelson_Mandela posted...

Pretty sure we'd be far more cautious launching a nuke than one of the thousand drone strikes made per year

Disavow our usage of drone stikes and their reckless disregard for innocent human life and I will have something to say.

I disavow anything that results in reckless collateral damage because it's wrong and also counterproductive to our strategic goals in the region
---

Free SephG

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

lordloki12 posted...

And some of you have wished certain supreme court judges would die, suggested the military should remove judges for blocking executive orders, and believe we should overthrow mexico for refusing to pay for the great wall in the south.

Please apologize for slandering me

Not seeing it

This is also incredibly ironic considering cokes and others were literally talking about dancing in the streets when scalia died
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.

And then you come here to wish death upon those who don't share your views.

I've only wished death upon ISIS but thanks for slandering my character

But you have no concern for the innocents that die as collateral damage?

I think I've clearly demonstrated that minimizing civilian deaths is a priority for me and at the very least have showed more than "no concern."

Thoughts?
---

Free SephG

lordloki12 posted...

And some of you have wished certain supreme court judges would die, suggested the military should remove judges for blocking executive orders, and believe we should overthrow mexico for refusing to pay for the great wall in the south.

Please apologize for slandering me
---

Free SephG

Pretty sure we'd be far more cautious launching a nuke than one of the thousand drone strikes made per year
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Wanglicious posted...

redrocket_pub posted...

We can't even use puny hellfire missiles launched from a drone without killing more civillians than actual terrorists.

And you expect us to believe we could use a nuke with surgical precision.

LOL.

so a news story you missed was the successful testing of the B61-12 last week. this is a nuke meant to replace previous entries and is being looked in favor over the B83. the B83 is one of the biggest nukes out there and it is completely impractical for usage, which is why military has been in favor of ditching it in favor of smaller ones. the B61-12 is special because it reduces the radius and fallout significantly enough that it can legitimately be used for precise strikes. intro for you to read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb#Mod_12


it's the first nuke that could be used in a proper military operation.

How does that remotely respond to the point I raised in the post you quoted?

...You... You serious?
---

Free SephG

IB Wang's facts are ignored in favor of simple defamation
---

Free SephG

DeathChicken posted...

Which reminds me that the saddest thing in all of this is pussying out of the whole Nuke Em gimmick the second the mods showed up. At least if MWC is going to shriek about everything being treason he won't back out and pretend he never did it just because he's afraid of those mean old mods

See several posts above. My opinion has never changed.
---

Free SephG

That's quite a stretch, even for you lasa!

PS Lasa is another example of a leftist I really enjoy talking to despite his politics being trash
---

Free SephG

Mr Lasastryke posted...

sephyg said:

Patriotic Americans are thirsty for a new war.

lol @ your whining about character assassination when you literally said this.

Where does that say I'm for killing civilians? Or does being pro-war vs ISIS or a brutal dictator automatically make me evil?
---

Free SephG

SupremeZero posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

SupremeZero posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

On display are the two most used Leftist tactics recently:

1. Unapologetic character assassination
2. Insinuating conservatives support barbaric policies by asking loaded questions

I don't know that leftists are the ones assassinating your character when you've gotten yourself banned over this...

Yes because gamefaqs mods are capable of common sense and reviewing posts in context, right? Lmfao you're getting desperate

... that's actually the problem here. The complete lack of context means everything they see is you.

They banned you based entirely on what YOU said.

Context is EVERYTHING. Please watch George Carlin speak on this. I'm sure you can find his bit on YouTube. And he's a leftist!
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

We can't even use puny hellfire missiles launched from a drone without killing more civillians than actual terrorists.

And you expect us to believe we could use a nuke with surgical precision.

LOL.

Please educate yourself about modern warfare before commenting thanks
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

*Openly advocates use of nuclear weapons in the Middle East*

*Cries about character assassination*

SephG, ladies and gentlemen.

See post above this one. Are you really that disingenuous?
---

Free SephG

SupremeZero posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

On display are the two most used Leftist tactics recently:

1. Unapologetic character assassination
2. Insinuating conservatives support barbaric policies by asking loaded questions

I don't know that leftists are the ones assassinating your character when you've gotten yourself banned over this...

Yes because gamefaqs mods are capable of common sense and reviewing posts in context, right? Lmfao you're getting desperate
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.

And then you come here to wish death upon those who don't share your views.

I've only wished death upon ISIS but thanks for slandering my character

But you have no concern for the innocents that die as collateral damage?

Of course I do. A goal for our military should always be minimizing collateral damage

This is why you're in favor of using nuclear weapons?

I'm not getting into this again but I've stated on numerous occasions that tactical nuclear strikes can be done with ZERO civilian casualties in certain scenarios.
---

Free SephG

Seriously, you guys are making well intentioned progressives look bad
---

Free SephG

On display are the two most used Leftist tactics recently:

1. Unapologetic character assassination
2. Insinuating conservatives support barbaric policies by asking loaded questions
---

Free SephG

redrocket_pub posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.

And then you come here to wish death upon those who don't share your views.

I've only wished death upon ISIS but thanks for slandering my character

But you have no concern for the innocents that die as collateral damage?

Of course I do. A goal for our military should always be minimizing collateral damage
---

Free SephG

lordloki12 posted...

And some of you have wished certain supreme court judges would die, suggested the military should remove judges for blocking executive orders, and believe we should overthrow mexico for refusing to pay for the great wall in the south.

MWC is literally the only advocate for any of this.

I'd like a formal apology
---

Free SephG

lordloki12 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.

And then you come here to wish death upon those who don't share your views.

I've only wished death upon ISIS but thanks for slandering my character
---

Free SephG

I work with feminists and radicalized gays and hang out with actual marxists. They do not know about my political beliefs. I embrace them and put politics aside to be great friends/colleagues with these people because it's important as a human to have a diverse group of people in your life.

When the Left can learn to do the same with conservatives, then maybe they'll start winning again. Until then, they will continue to ThisIsWhyYouLost.
---

Free SephG

Tokyo Drift is the only one that matches the racing zen that makes the original so amazing. Incredibly underrated.

8 is in the middle of the pack, which means it's like 9/10
---

Free SephG

Virginity, dignity
---

Free SephG

94 ISIS scumbags killed by the MOAB

Can't really say it wasn't a massive success
---

Free SephG

Lmfao the attempted narrative shift is hilariously pathetic
---

Free SephG

UltimaterializerX posted...

http://fortune.com/2016/12/19/social-media-election/

This is why liberals get accused of being in a bubble. Because they are, in fact, in a self-made bubble.

No surprise that liberal women are so sensitive that a third of them can't even see an opposing viewpoint without running away to hide
---

Free SephG

GuessMyUserName posted...

https://www.propublica.org/article/devos-candice-jackson-civil-rights-office-education-department

christ

- racism is real, it's keepin' white folks down
- feminism is bad, gender equality is here
- direct quotes, "[t]he real women’s issues are conservative ones."
- "College women who insist on banding together by gender to fight for their rights are moving backwards, not forwards."

education dept. head of civil rights office


like I get that there are crazies that agree with this woman, but this stuff is what her job is all about and she doesn't give a fuck

These are all true though
---

Free SephG

cokes
lefty
---

Free SephG

Lou Reed - Metal Machine Music
---

Free SephG

Paratroopa1 posted...

Fuck, is there an opposite of a sunk cost fallacy

Just because we've already spent the money on the bomb doesn't mean we can waste it

I'm not saying that's what we did, but I sure as hell hope it wasn't "symbolic"

I hope so too! Just trying to preclude the America-haters here from gleefully boasting if the bomb wasn't 100% effective
---

Free SephG

Paratroopa1 posted...

I don't think "symbolic gestures" are the best use of our defense money

The money was already spent
---

Free SephG

Paratroopa1 posted...

1) Deploying a weapon is part of the cost of using it, not just creating and maintaining it

2) Uh, we like, restock our ordinance after we've used it right?

Defense budgets are set regardless of what weapons we use when. You can argue against the MOAB use but a financial argument is a silly one.
---

Free SephG

Peace___Frog posted...

Guys it was a warning - never mind the fact that our enemies are happy to see us bankrupt ourselves doing nothing of value.

I didn't realize that the United States paid extra to create this bomb specifically for Trump
---

Free SephG

Awesome. It doesn't even matter if the bomb doesn't do practical damage (although I can't imagine how it won't). The symbolism is real.
---

Free SephG

re-tag
---

Free SephG

SupremeZero posted...

Did you get purged AGAIN?

Banned for literally advocating for a humane end to the Syrian conflict

But I'd like to see them try to ban this username and suffer that kind of PR!
---

Free SephG

A+ topic title, Jakyl

Please don't goad me into talking about nuclear war anymore
---

Free SephG