Lurker > MachineJaipur

Trickfinger posted...

do you not have a subscription?

Sorry, I'm not here often enough to justify

TC is your image broken it won't load for me, even if I open the link in a tab

So when a group of white officers gang up on and execute someone extrajudiciously, does he complain that they didn't have a strong white male figure?

DrizztLink posted...

They mean issues like suicide, assisted suicide, drug legality, things that ultimately only have physical effects on the person doing it.

Drug legality is a gray area in that regards. Unless the state is providing 'hard' drugs to addicts, letting people freely and wantonly do hard drugs can lead to an increase in crime rates because people are trying to afford their next fix.

In theory, yes, you should be able to do the drugs you want, but without the proper resources to assist those who do that, you'll quickly affect other people's "bodily autonomy"

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/5/4/AAecKNAAEILG.jpg

Whose penis, CE?

Pretty generic response.

She kept talking about how she was going to grow from it, without saying how or giving any actions she was going to take.

At least she's willing to accept that she messed up, even if it took way too many people to prove to her that she was in the wrong

epik_fail1 posted...

https://twitter.com/WashireRPAdvice/status/1381266386866081793

This sounds like something you'd read on CE

epik_fail1 posted...

Did you see the dumb tweet that claimed all women under 5'7 were "minor coded" or something. Please someone find this

Isn't the average female height under 5' 7"?

the_pika posted...

I dont know what the former is, but the latter is.

the other one is FdS

Witches vs Patriarchy.

Was more just a guess. WvP is usually light hearted when it pops up on the front page, but wouldn't be surprised if unsavory elements lingered under the surface

the_pika posted...

they used to have a website, which got banned because it was mostly castration fantasies. Some of them fled to two very specific subreddits

WvP and 2X?

MetroidGamer666 posted...

Women arent adults until they are 25, right?

Women are only able to make decisions regarding men or relationships with those within 2 years of their age, otherwise they're either too old or they are not mature enough to be trusted to make their own decisions in the matter.

ROOTFayth posted...

I posted for a little on reddit and stopped, I think twice I had posts that ended up with over 10k upvotes and some people accused me of being bot and karma farming or some shit lol, what even would be the point of that?

You can sell high karma accounts for money

It's a yes or no question

rexcrk posted...

>21

>underage

Pick one

Apparently she is incapable of being grown up, despite being 21

Burnerway posted...

TC living in another reality.

That's her words.

The only thing you're underage for at 21 is renting cars without an additional fee

https://twitter.com/TheJoeySwoll/status/1616611613666340864

The video in question is only like 30, 40 seconds long before the guy starts talking.

Also literally underage 21 y/o girl and thinking he's going to go to jail for staring at you. Lmao

Everybody you've ever known is full of shit. Remember that.

https://youtu.be/5n5qkK4ZEg4

Set it at the end of the conveyor belt

Which is more shameful, in your opinion?

If you just called and/or left a voice message saying "I was just calling to say that I love you" or something to that exact effect to the person you love most in the world, would they take it as a sign to be worried or call/contact you back?

Kloe_Rinz posted...

some user poster
He broke a duty of care he had to protect user information

This may have actually happened before he took over and due to policies in place before his takeover.

Musk deserves criticism for a variety of reasons, but this may not be it

https://www.cshub.com/attacks/news/investigation-launched-into-twitter-after-400m-user-details-posted-on-hacking-forum

A dataset allegedly containing the email addresses and phone numbers of more than 400 million Twitter users has been put up for sale on hacking forum Breached Forums.

The dataset was uploaded to Breached Forums on December 23, 2022, by a hacker going by the screen name Ryushi. The hacker claimed to have collected the data using data scraping techniques and a now-patched vulnerability in the social media sites software in 2021 and demanded US$200,000 for an exclusive sale of the data.

In their post, the hacker addressed Twitter owner Elon Musk directly, saying: Twitter or Elon Musk if you are reading this you are already risking a GDPR fine over 5.4 m[illion] breach imaging [sic] the fine of 400 m[illion] users breach.
Your best option to avoid paying $276 million USD in GDPR breach fines like Facebook did...is to buy this data exclusively.
The hacker went on to warn that if Twitter did not buy the data before it was sold, users would lose trust in you and said that if malicious actors used the data to gain unauthorized access to the accounts of prominent people (e.g. celebrities or politicians), that they will for sure make them ghost the platform and ruin [Musks] dream of Twitter being a video sharing platform.
Ryushi went on to say that the data breach would exacerbate an already sensitive time for content creators on Twitter, and that if Musk was unsure about what to do he should run a poll on Twitter like usual and people will chose their fate, a reference to the fact Musk has allegedly used Twitter polls to influence business decisions.
The hacker also blamed Twitter directly for that hack, saying "at the end of the day its the companys fault this data was breached".
Users of the site have urged Musk to publicly comment on the data breach. Cyber security expert and investigative journalist Brian Krebs tagged Musk in a public post about the breach, saying that he owe[s] Twitter a reply about the breach, even if it didn't happen on [his] watch.
The forum post included sample data for 37 celebrities, corporations, journalists, politicians and government agencies including Doja Cat, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the World Health Organization, Shawn Mendes and Piers Morgan.
It has been suspected that the sample data has already been used by malicious actors to access the accounts listed in the sample, namely British tabloid journalist Piers Morgan. This suspicion arose after Morgans Twitter was allegedly hacked and a number of strange tweets were posted to his profile between Christmas Day and Boxing Day 2022.
These tweets included abusive messages, false information and racial slurs directed at a number of people including the late Queen Elizabeth II and singer Ed Sheeran.
Morgan has not yet publicly addressed the hack.
Investigation into Twitter launched following breach
The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) announced on December 23, 2022, that it will be launching an investigation into a breach that exploited the same vulnerability and affected 5.4 million users in July 2022. This investigation was referenced by Ryushi in their post.
The breach took place using a vulnerability in Twitter software that was first flagged to the company in January 2022. This vulnerability allowed malicious actors to learn if an email address or phone number was associated with an existing account by entering the number or email address and attempting to log in.
The DPC said in a statement that it had corresponded with Twitter International Unlimited Company (TIC) in relation to the data breach and raised queries in relation to GDPR compliance.
After considering the information provided by TIC in response to its queries, the DPC said it was of the opinion that one or more provisions of the GDPR and/or the Act may have been, and/or are being, infringed in relation to Twitter Users personal data.
As a result of this, the DPC said that it will be investigating the data breach to determine whether TIC has complied with its obligations, as controller, in connection with the processing of personal data of its users or whether any provision(s) of the GDPR and/or the Act have been, and/or are being, infringed by TIC in this respect.
In November 2022, social media company Meta was fined $275 million following an investigation by the DPC into a Facebook data leak that took place in April 2021. This was also referred to by the hacker in their Breached Forums post.

Big, if true.

Small asking price, though. Surely 400M users would be worth more than $200K on the black market, especially if they have access to VIPs.

tripleh213 posted...

I find it ok buy why does he have to post it.

Probably because he knows it's controversially taken so a light bit of trolling/attention-grabbing

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

These people are sexually and emotionally repressed individuals who have been taught to view all affection as inherently sexual, even the process of dating is increasingly less about having an affectionate partner with whom to share your life with and instead more about having someone to sleep with.

Combine that with a focused effort of enhancing awareness of stranger danger having an (un)intended side effect of teaching society to view all males as inherently dangerous predators and it isn't really a wonder that American society can't view things as platonic or non-sexual.

It's so easy to tell America has such repressed emotional outlets because Americans view everything remotely venturing into the realm of non-sexual intimacy as inappropriate, if not outright sexual.

Brady frenching, or borderline at least, his son was a lot weirder than this.

God, CE needs to go non-sexually touch skin with other people. Fuck touching grass. Go be close with someone else.

BloodMoon7 posted...

Nah. I've seen people naked. Honestly not a big deal and you kinda just forget about it. It's not like you fucked.

What if you forgot you fucked them?

metralo posted...

not even remotely

Sex doesn't even really change the way I view someone in my experience

You fuck for fun, not intimacy?

If you saw, like, someone you work with naked, would that change your perception of them or is it whatever?

Would it bother you more to have 5 people ahead of you or to have 1 person placing 5 individual orders for other people?

lilORANG posted...

How are you going to know that baby's gender until it's old enough for you to ask it, TC?

Fuck.

Guess um, uh, it won't be an issue til then.

TMOG posted...

You really bought a three-year-old account just so you could make this dumb topic, huh

Nobody is buying a 3 year old account lmao

StarbucksWorker posted...

what kind of stupass question is this?!

There are apparently nutcases in the world that believe no man should be trusted with children, period

I'll trade a ban of Mr Worldwide in place of a ban of pitbulls

MabusIncarnate posted...

Yes he should be allowed? Wtf is a single dad with a young daughter gonna do if not?

Obviously give up the child for adoption since he, like all men, cannot be trusted /s

Should a generic, loving father who has no outstanding issues (past abuse, alcohol abuse, etc) be allowed to bathe his baby daughter in the event that the mother is absent for whatever reason?

Or should it be made a social faux pas or illegal to do so?

Or are those who believe there is anything wrong for a father to be a parent, get clocked upside the head?

Popcorn2000 posted...

I guess revelation must come to even the nonbelievers

the truth had to break its way into their skulls eventually

Proto_Spark posted...

There's no reason to pretend r/conservative is full of reasonable people. Even now they still live on just a whole other world compared to anything that's actually happening.

Oh, I'm not pretending that they were.

I'm just acknowledging it wasn't just The Donald 2.0.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/5/7/AAecKNAAEAiF.jpg

Wonder what the next restriction will be

Lost_All_Senses posted...

is is only big if you actually believed that there wete no conservatives that could think for themselves this whole time. It's just that nobody reports on people who don't think in extremes. And now somebody here is reporting on people not going to extremes. The idea that someone could be conservative and not for Trump is only surprising if you've been in a left leaning echo chamber the last 6 years. There will always be independent stranglers outside the hivemind people love to focus on.

Edit: Tbf, I don't know how this subreddit goes. So, maybe it is a big change in this specific space lol

They weren't The Donald levels of cult, but they were all generally fairly bought in to Trump.

You couldn't speak ill of Trump, for the most part. And when Trump would do something controversial, they'd restrict the thread to Flaired Users Only to avoid brigading.

i owe Margot Robbie an apology

i thought that first image was Billie Eilish

MelbuFrahma4 posted...

So how long until CE says TikTok posts shouldnt be news. Or has CE accepted it and stopped trying to derail threads with that comment.

This one gets a pass since it's a legitimate point.

Something with that much sugar and caffeine should be labeled, at minimum, as one container being more sugar than recommended by the FDA for an adult in one day and the drink marketed as an energy drink (but not in such a manner like "Stronger than an energy drink!")

HylianFox posted...

Brad strikes again, dammit Brad

When will the Chads strike back?

https://www.dailydot.com/irl/panera-charged-lemonade-caffeine-warning/

Ever since its release, the Charged lemonades from Panera Bread have stirred up controversy. The product has gone viral several times on TikTok, with each user shocked by the high sugar and caffeine content.
As the Daily Dot previously reported, a large Charged Lemonade has over 100 grams of sugar and 390 milligrams of caffeine. This means that there are almost 13 milligrams of caffeine and nearly 4 grams of sugar per ouncewhich is more sugar and caffeine per fluid ounce than a can of Monster Energy.
Now, another user has gone viral and sparked discussion after sharing their own experience with the beverage.
In a video with over 428,000 views, TikTok user Sarah (@sarahebaus) claims that she started drinking the specialty lemonade while doing work at a Panera Bread location. It was only later when she was ordering the drink again with her husband, who is a Type 1 diabetic, that she realized just how much sugar and caffeine is in the drink.
@Panera Bread this drink should come with a warning because its delicious and will lead to my cardiac arrest, she writes in the videos caption.
In this video, Sarah says, while she knew the drink had caffeine, she consumed four or five of them over the course of a given workday as the location has free refills.
Four or five cups of coffee is within the recommendations of caffeine limits from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which suggest that a person should not consume more than 400 milligrams of caffeine per day.
What Sarah did not realize, however, was just how much stronger the Charged Lemonade is than an average cup of coffee. In fact, following those guidelines, a person should not drink more than one large Charged Lemonade in a single day, let alone 4 or 5.
Sarah appears to be drinking the regular size, which has 260 mg of caffeine, per Paneras website. Still, drinking even two of these drinks would put one over the FDAs daily recommended caffeine limit.
Many users in comments expressed their shock at the drinks contents.
260??????Are you kidding, my pre workout rn doesnt even have that much, shared a commenter. I thought it was going to be less then coffee!
Giiiiiirl that is SO MUCH SUGAR and I RARELY say that, noted a second.
Some claimed theyve already had negative experiences with the drink.
these drinks gave me heart attack symptoms and i thought it was over, alleged a commenter.
I work there and warn so many mothers when their 7 yr old will fill up a 30 ounce cup, stated another. the caffeine sign needs to be way bigger.
I couldnt sleep one night and my heart was racing, recounted a further user. the only new thing I had were these drinks so I looked up the nutritional facts and about died.
Still, some were excited by the high caffeine content.
This was honestly the best advertisement FOR this lemonade bc I was convinced it wouldnt have enough caffeine for me lol, wrote a user.
Not me running to Panera to get one, thinking about everything I can get done this afternoon, said an additional TikToker.
The Daily Dot reached out to both Sarah and Panera via email.

Over 100 grams of sugar?

Man, might as well say "Yes, I'd like one order of diabetes before I leave the building"

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/0/9/AAecKNAAD_tx.jpg

By controversial, and it looks like they're not all in on DeSantis, yet

metralo posted...

They will be back tomorrow when they forget this ever happened

One would think, but

Everytime Trump disappoints, r/conservative slowly grows further and further apart from Trump.

This might just be the straw to break the camels back.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/7/9/AAecKNAAD_tT.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/8/0/AAecKNAAD_tU.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/8/1/AAecKNAAD_tV.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/8/2/AAecKNAAD_tW.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/8/3/AAecKNAAD_tX.jpg

A fanbase divided.

This isn't quite how I imagined Trump getting abandoned but lmao

bump

Where people pop their own pimples/cysts/blackheads/etc or people pop other people's pimples/cysts/blackhead/etc

Zikten posted...

Cult leaders always just want an excuse to have rampant sex

It's weird though, that religions are usually anti-rampant sex and they always use religion to get rampant sex