Lurker > Blade-wolf

Yes. Its really good. Recommend chicken tikka masala
---

hustler

Yeah yeah. They can still be kids, as long as they're programmed with what you feel is proper
---

hustler

Some of these new techniques are genius (Wraith Flash auto-branding weakling enemies? Teleporting to archers? YES)

It was a lot of fun. Don't know why I took so long to complete it.

Why bother forging an artifact of untold power if you have such a lame drawback, haha.

I think it ties into the overall lore by demonstrating that the more minds the ring enslaves, the stronger the ring gets.
---

hustler

Dyinglegacy posted...

FrisbeeDude posted...

2005-2010 was the fucking wild west of online dating... I could go on all day with stories

Give one. A crazy one.

@FrisbeeDude

!!!
---

hustler

Great game. Has the best combat of any JRPG I've ever played, and I've played tons. Game tends to a drag a bit later on though, but I won't spoil that for you.
---

hustler

Monolith1676 posted...

Let kids be kids.

"Not without social indoctrination first. Kthxbye."

--this topic
---

hustler

It doesn't. And I'm not the only one. Others in this topic have reasonable positions as well.
---

hustler

Maybe if you all would stop using ad hom then reasonable people wouldn't have to respond that way.
---

hustler

Trump isn't going to go out like Dubya and Barry. I don't see him starting any new wars
---

hustler

ElatedVenusaur posted...

They also have an easier time getting STDs or getting sexually assaulted, raped, and/or murdered.

So?
---

hustler

Bucks in 5 dubs in 6
---

hustler

Having trouble believing this one
---

hustler

Lmao
---

hustler

Online dating is literally like ordering pussy. Its very easy. But, I enjoy meeting chicks in person first, always have
---

hustler

There is zero support for this.
---

hustler

GasMonkey posted...

still waiting for links
a reputable site would have you warned at this point.

Keep waiting
---

hustler

I gave a little head here and there when requested or I felt like it but I never received head

She has hygiene issues
---

hustler

GeneralKenobi85 posted...

You do get OP in both games, but the difference is that War is just much more difficult in general

This. I was getting my ass kicked in the demo.
---

hustler

Shotgunnova posted...

I'd consider getting the second game based on the strength of this one, yeah.

You can play the demo on steam. Seems a bit different to me, though the fundamentals are the same with a few new additions
---

hustler

Shotgunnova posted...

Is the DLC any good? I have the GOTY edition.

Yes, its fantastic and just the right length. Believe its composed of beastmaster where you fight orcs who control giant beasts and then you play as the elf who made the ring. Now the boss fight in that one is outstanding
---

hustler

On a basic level obviously
---

hustler

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Why do all you guys post in the same style, btw? The whole "Really telling/interesting/strange/curious" style of retorts is getting incredibly repetitive.

Its an attempt to keep the conversation civil in the face of unreasoning hostility and defensive smugness. Nothing repetitive about it
---

hustler

Dragonblade01 posted...

Well yeah. That post was a representation of one of your own, so I imagine a burp would have more content.

Nah. That was all you kid. I'm here trying to get the bottom of things, and discovering advocates don't really have much backing their positions, and you're here trying for one upvote type comments. Take that shit back to reddit
---

hustler

davidg4l posted...

You say that like helping kids to learn about tolerating gay people is a strictly negative thing.

Again, whats wrong about teaching kids to tolerate and acknowledge the existence of gay people?

Again, there is a difference between acknowledging their existence then dictating to them how to view their existence. Then there's the age issue. Then there's the issue of it displacing more important subjects.
---

hustler

show you what is taught in elementary school?

Well yeah. You should be able to show me where it is in a curriculum. I don't feel this is an unreasonable request.

dang now it makes sense why you think racism and homophobia is freedom of thought.

Do I? You're making bad inferences. All I said was schools should not be able to dictate how to view these issues. Not really a radical statement.

and i like how you just ignore the rest of my post lol

I responded to 2/3rds of your post

Dragonblade01 posted...

"What's 2+2?"

It's 4.

"See? Nobody answers my questions."

Right now I just burped and it had more content than this post.
---

hustler

Conflict posted...

I didn't even know this was a thing

Yeah. Measles and other rates are rising here in Arizona because of it. I myself am divided on the idea. Its a public safety issue at heart though.
---

hustler

Hard to ignore what isn't there. I ask questions they get diverted or answered as vaguely as possible. None of you have thought this through. Its just a "like to have", or a way to get your own life's grievances remedied. No one is thinking about whats best for the kids, just what helps advance your ideologies.
---

hustler

I mean, you guys can try to group up but I'm on the side of reason and logic. And its quite comfortable here.
---

hustler

---

hustler

Tmaster148 posted...

Blade-wolf posted...

Tmaster148 posted...

So you don't feel racism is wrong.

Is this a statement or a question?

So you also don't know what questions and statements are.

Probably no more than you realize how to use proper grammar.

Are you going to come out and say what you mean or keep sniping? I don't have to answer you, or respond. I hope you realize that.
---

hustler

MwarriorHiei posted...

they will teach it in whatever time they already have alloted for that kind of material. it doesnt take thirty minutes to say "some people have two mommies and some have two daddies and there is nothing wrong with that."

You are unfamiliar with how school curriculums work I see.

we dont have anti-racism classes, but it is still taught in school to not be racist. and society feels racism is wrong because we learn it is wrong in school.

Can you show me? I ain't from Missouri but I need to see it.
---

hustler

Tmaster148 posted...

So you don't feel racism is wrong.

Is this a statement or a question?
---

hustler

PleaseClap posted...

Yes, things have been swell for lgbtq folks for the entirety of history. Clearly a superb model to follow

You're still talking? You have nothing beyond sarcasm and barbs. At this point pipe down and try to let others explain the position you hold so tightly but are unable to articulate in an adult way.

Sir Will posted...

Wherever they pick it up, is it or is it not a job of a school to counter it?

Not officially, no. Obviously if there are incidents within the school setting, teachers should counter that.
---

hustler

davidg4l posted...

Does it say anywhere in the article that this will take precedence over areas like math, language, etc.

Obviously the time that it takes for them to learn this will push other subjects out. I'm just trying to find what its more important than. Gym? Science? Math? English? No one has a real answer, but yet still somehow seem to feel that "its ultra important, because reasons".

The negative outcome if they don't learn about it, is that these kids won't learn to tolerate gay people.

That is conjecture on your part. To the people screaming about racism earlier, we do not have anti-racism classes for the very young yet most of society seems to feel it is wrong, somehow. This subject is no different. Its just naked social engineering, prescribing attitudes these kids are most likely going to pick up later in an informal way anyway. And even if they don't, who cares? Freedom of thought is a good thing, not a bad one.
---

hustler

The opposite of most posters here
---

hustler

What is the question of homosexuality and are there really that many valid answers? Do you also find it wrong if small children are told that racism is bad? Skin colors obviously have always existed, but why should we tell them those other skin colors are okay and equally human? Why teach them anti-racism before they can even realize racism is a choice?

Kids aren't really racist, they learn it from home. Linguists have found our brains at a young age discriminate more on speech patterns and modes of speech much more than skin colors.

Sir Will posted...

It is very relavant.

the question is, WHY?

Why is this so important that it takes precedence over every other area of human knowledge out there? And what is the negative outcome if they don't learn about it? Maybe you can't answer. These other guys can't.

mybbqrules posted...

Can we let kids be kids please? And this is coming from someone who leans left and lives in California.

No we cannot. This is ultra serious business, despite mankind getting by for millions of years without this, and hundreds of years in modern life without these social indoctrination programs.
---

hustler

She's just some dumb kid. Who cares? She'll grow out of it. And if she doesn't, she'll soon end up in a correctional facility, laying her head in the lap of some burly woman named Big Bertha.
---

hustler

Now you're just trolling, because you're unable to articulate why this subject is so crucial that 4 year olds should learn it. Don't feel bad. Most zealots became that way from lack of reflection as well.
---

hustler

Tmaster148 posted...

So you want kids to be able to question homosexuality.

Question its existence? No. It obviously exists and has always existed.

Question how they are to view it? Yes. Thats an individual matter. Unfortunately this is exactly what most zealots want, to shape how they view it before they even realize what it is.
---

hustler

hockeybub89 posted...

If they wouldn't know what's going on or what he was talking about, then how could be brainwash them?

Yeah, because its not like you can't program kids on complex subjects they have no real idea about.

The earlier kids learn things the harder it is for them to go back on it or question it, even later in life.

See: billions of Muslims and Christians. These religions use the same indoctrination techniques as the social progressives. The only difference is the social progressives are even worse at providing real justifications for their programs.
---

hustler

PleaseClap posted...

Why would telling children about gay people take away their innocence?

Nice reversal. That's not the issue here. The issue is, advocates need to make a stronger case FOR including this subject in their curriculum. So far you haven't done so, or spelled out what the alternative results in if they do not learn these things at that age.

I would think that they would have real f***ed up preconceptions about sex, would probably lead to a bunch of teenage pregnancies, spread stds, things like that

good thing that never happens and high schoolers just naturally figure it out

Well they've been figuring it out since mankind began. I find it telling that you can respond to this but not my other arguments. Strange. Beginning to think you don't have any real justifications for such an obviously zealous stance.
---

hustler

Indeed. The issue here is you seem to think both parties aren't in on the manipulation.
---

hustler

@PleaseClap

You haven't made a good case for including social projects like these over real education in the sciences, mathematics or technology. Hell you haven't even made a case for this over letting kids have an extended nap-time. What I've gotten so far is you feel this is so important, to get kids while they're so young they don't know whats going on and what you're even talking about.
---

hustler

PleaseClap posted...

Ah yes, "the lgbtq community exists and deserves basic human respect," truly the most radical of ideologies.

If its so basic and non-radical it doesn't need to have classroom time. It'll be picked up by them later on in due time.

You probably think that if sex education weren't taught in schools kid wouldn't know what sex is.

The fact that you're so intent on pushing for this is what worries me. You don't respect young children and the fact that they grow in stages.
---

hustler

@PleaseClap
And how you phrased it sure as hell is ideology.
"Here is social subject X".
"Here is how we want you to think about it".
"This is the right way to think about it".

Thats naked ideology and social engineering.
---

hustler

The fact that gay people exist is not an ideology

Its an irrelevant fact of life that they'll learn on their own later. You are in favor of wasting classroom time for something they'll pick up later on just living life. Why is that I wonder?
---

hustler

PleaseClap posted...

Because some of those kindergartners will be part of the lgbtq community or know people that are, and need to know that that's normal and ok

Kids don't know what they are. Save it for later, if it at all. Getting them that early is just more Soviet style indoctrination, social engineering if you want to be blas about it. You're acting like America as a whole were unaware gay people existed unless they learned about it in classrooms. To you, the classroom is a social lab perfect for pushing your particularly favored ideologies. To me, its a place where kids should be learning about academic subjects that will make them successful in today's economy.
---

hustler

PleaseClap posted...

Telling kids that lgbtq people exist is not propaganda. It's worrying that you think it is

Whats the reason that they need to know as kindergartners
---

hustler