Lurker > BlackScythe0

Damn, so every single republican voted no.
Thats so ridiculous, it makes the whole thing meaningless.

And nothing will come of this.

Based on this precedent that the House has just set I hope to see every single future President impeached if the opposition party holds the House majority. After all the House literally gets to decide what is and isnt impeachable on a whim and then just has to prove that it took place. Its already been admitted during the hearing that every single President, save possibly for Harrison who only served 31 days, would have been impeached based on the rules proposed by the House during this impeachment.

As if all democrats and republicans are supposed to be of a hive mind mentality and do the same as others. Shes thinking for herself and showing that shes not like the others so thats good, IMO. Helps bridge the gap.

Then why did he pack a chainsaw with the intent to skin my ass raw?

How are representatives and senators appointed?

and the Oval Office is just the president himself?

If it isn't a witch hunt or fishing expedition, why would they be subpoening Trump's tax returns over a complaint involving a phone call? And if these were good faith efforts, why did the calls for impeachment start even before Trump took office?

Its a stat anywhere Ive ever worked in my life. The last place I worked had the 24th, 25th, 26th and the 1st all paid for.

Reminder that Tulsi sucks

https://mobile.twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1206197215762341889

Beans in chili is gross, and an abomination. Beans are hella too starchy (texture) for that

At least the kid was actually attacked by people who support violence, like you and Jen0125, by labeling them as racists or what not, The typical tolerance, hypocrisy and "niceness" of the left.

I find it ironic that people that wear MAGA hats are labelled as racists and hate-mongers when people literally beat and harass the people who wear them simply for wearing them. Who are the hateful ones again?

If Biden corrupt it needs to be investigated before he becomes a president.

If it benefits Trump or not is besides the point.

There's video and the school system and police said it was non policitally motivated fight, but since the mom, who has been either lying or over exaggerating the whole story thought it was and you want to be hardheaded and not admit you didn't read the topic, here we are. You still being wrong.

They aren't investigating a political opponent. They're investigating a company within their country and what happened with a preosecutor in their legal system that was looking into that company.

The Ukraine investigation into Burisma is needed to determine if there is cause to investigate Biden for corruption.

That's called diplomacy. The president is suppose to do that.

The Ukrainian president says he didn't know about the delay in aid when he agreed to the request.
Also, Biden is corrupt. Is he immune from investigation because he's running for office?

Considering that the impeachment hearings are just the latest move in the Democrats refusal to accept the 2016 election results any testimony that doesn't fit their narrative is immedaitely going to deemed perjury.

So why did Mike Huckabee say Trump could run for a third term? This seems to have come up a few months ago, and it seems that the 22nd Amendment says it's totally illegal for someone to be elected President more than twice, no matter what the circumstances are.

https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2019/oct/02/kaya-jones/donald-trump-third-term-failed-impeachment-would/

i was born at the very end of 1995 so im millennial or gen z depending on who you ask

Is this what political discussion has devolved into? Discussing whether he will have a third term or not?

Lol this source. Ok lemme go ahead and cite a Breitbart article. Wait, that would actually be more reputable lol

Honestly, none of those women do anything for me.

Even the biggest of idiots in Washington are not even giving credibility on the Russia claims anymore.

I suggest coming back to reality.

We know, the Dems offer nothing but virtue signaling and promise of more socialism, but there is no need to be delusional about reality.

While I don't agree with Rand Paul on everything (I like his dad even better) I think he's one of the very few honorable politicians, he actually cares about liberty and not party lines

He's not going to be impeached and personally I think this is a massive waste of time and energy and is distracting from far more important issues. That said, I do agree with argument that the system is obligated to go through the process regardless. It just sucks because it means it's all most people are talking about when there's far more important stuff going on right now.

Shahid Buttar must replace that corporate cash sucker.

Yeah, what a weird take. It's not like the facts/evidence are a secret anymore. And the jury isn't infallible.

Ahhh the old artificial right vs left battle as if that has fuck all to do with this lol. Do people still not realize the right vs left battle is propagated by the establishment?

So if a crucial witness turned out to be making up their story that doesnt matter? That could have a major effect on the case and public perception. If parts of the story were fabricated, it may not have even gone to trial or caused the same media frenzy.

I know it's your schtick to be angry and wrong all the time but just stop