Lurker > Background_Guy

Anteaterking posted...

I know you're just trolling, but it has less to do with "women can't handle it but men can" and more that women get put into the position far more often than men.

Like I've been in an uncomfortable situation before on a "date" that I felt too awkward about to get out of and ended up doing things I didn't really want to because it wasn't easy to just stand up and walk away. Like physically it was trivial to do that, but it was the sort of thing where I was trying to passively resolve the situation with the path of least resistance.

Now imagine that any situation where you're alone with a guy can develop into one of those situations because of cultural expectations.

I have been in uncomfortable situations before. Sometimes I would stay, sometimes I would leave. Either way, I knew it was my choice because I'm a grown adult with fully developed physical and mental capabilities.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


...Uh dude, accounts are free. If you're paying for your account then clearly someone is scamming you.

pinky0926 posted...

Why are you like this

Why do I believe women have the same cognitive ability as men? Personal experience, I guess. Maybe if you talked to more women you would realize that they don't need to be led around and protected all the time.

pinky0926 posted...

Keep rocking that woke feminism bro. The ladies love it when you disregard their stories and lived experiences with that macho tough love.

Internalized sexism is a major issue . Women are raised from birth to believe they are helpless and the playthings of men. Guys like you are trying very hard to maintain that view.

Tactical_Spork posted...

This bad faith argument is nonsensical moron shit and you know it, you know how hopelessly fucking stupid your posts are and you are fishing for someone to tell you as much to troll.

So here you go. Get a better hobby.

Throwing a tantrum when your outdated beliefs are questioned, typical.

pinky0926 posted...

Yeah, imagine thinking that the act of acknowledging abuse of established power dynamics is misogyny

Are you also the guy that thinks pointing out acts of police brutality is demeaning to POC? That's pretty much how your argument works. Being an ally to women or even just acknowledging their experiences is...taking away their agency?

If I bash my head against an electric fence enough I'm sure it will make sense

Treating women like babies with no agency is not "being an ally". It's asserting your control over them.

pinky0926 posted...

Dude, stop. Theres not a single person in the room with a triple digit IQ who doesn't see right through your disingenuous nonsense.

Male supremacists acting smug

BeantownHero posted...

...do you know anything about sexual assault? I'm sincerely asking.

Posting nonsense to distract from your statements, smh.

Bass_X0 posted...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2o1yPmAmNo

Why

BeantownHero posted...

this sounded a lot better in your head, I'm sure

Sorry, I'm against infantilizing and demeaning women. I consider them fully capable adults, and I hope that some day you might consider that as well.

BeantownHero posted...

Or just be a better man, so the women who is more then likely less physically imposing and thus, at a major disadvantage if things turn violent, doesnt have to navigate the feelings of an aggressive drunk dude who has demonstrated hes willing to be physical in his pursuit

It's very misogynistic to say women don't have control over their own actions. Women don't need men to lead them around or give them permission to Express themselves. Smh

Also you're straight up saying that a healthy young woman is weaker than a chubby middle-aged nerd, that is also problematic.

What did Cry do?

Odoylerules posted...

this is a neckbeard post

It's true tho

Aki_Sora posted...

America

Sex is bad, violence is good

Your effeminate squeamishness and constant whining is probably why we rule over you.

M in the US is equivalent to both PEGI 16 and 18. It's a different system.

Eab1990 posted...

Citation needed.

Ok I just glanced at your sig and realized you're a full-blown pedophile so I'll just tag you and move on

Eab1990 posted...

None on the level of AAA gaming porn.

I didn't know pantyshots and cleavage were "explicit sexual scenes".

Even the Pokemon anime had bath scenes. Are you going to call that explicit too?

What, you're arguing semantics now? The games you love are about sexualizing children, that's the problem. It doesn't matter if it's a full-blown sex scene or just super suggestive, both of those things will repulse any adult with a moral compass.

Eab1990 posted...

It's funny that this point keeps coming up, as if this is what's actually being censored.

But it is? You guys keep naming examples of underaged girls. Every time you get outraged, it's about not being able to see some underaged girl's panties or cleavage.

It's also funny that there's an entire genre of porn dedicated to high school or younger, and that's completely legal too.

What does this have to do with sony?

Why the fuck do you play so many games about ogling teenagers

Calwings posted...

They've started doing in recent years. The American side of Sony are trying to force even Japanese developers to meet American "standards" to release their games on PS4 even in Japan. That's why games like Omega Labyrinth and Hyperdimension Neptunia have been getting more Switch releases these days, and why the Senran Kagura franchise is all but dead now after making their home on Playstation consoles for a while. The developers don't want to deal with these unfair standards that Sony specifically puts on them even after the ESRB says the game is fine to release with an M rating.

Aren't all the characters in these games also high school girls?
Do you really not understand the difference between showing explicit sexual scenes of adults vs explicit sexual scenes of children?

Calwings posted...

https://www.gematsu.com/2020/06/aokana-four-rhythms-across-the-blue-for-ps4-has-four-modified-scenes-three-removed-scenes-in-the-west

Just earlier today, another Japanese game is announced to have PS4-exclusive censorship even beyond what was already cut out to bring it down to an M rating. Even when the games already censor themselves down to fit within an M rating (which, again, is still far less explicit than what was allowed in TLOU2) Sony forces them to censor it even more.

The big deal is that Sony is shamelessly allowing an explicit sex scene in TLOU2 while piling extra censorship requirements onto Japanese games and their developers. It's blatant hypocrisy. Either hold TLOU2 to the same standard and have it censored as well or don't ask other games that are already far less explicit from the beginning to censor themselves even more.

How old are these characters? The girl in the pic is clearly wearing a schoolgirl uniform.