Lurker > Solid Sonic

Where do you stand on this?

No civility, no "talking it out", actual malice and vindictiveness that someone would dare take a contrary position to you. Your feel your blood boil whenever their stupid, ignorant, flagrantly uninformed half-ass """opinion""" challenges your own.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Mr_Karate_II posted...

Nice context

You need context for a topic claiming a user got modded for spitting in the face of a user across the Internet?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I'm always suspicious of them. I feel like you violate too many rules or miss dues payments and suddenly your house is theirs and you're gone. Doesn't matter if you own your own property, you're still under their thumb.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

The Champion's Hill Alpha had a ton of audio problems.

It uses the modern CoD engine, which I like, but I don't care for the WW2 setting (gen 6 ruined the whole thing for me by spamming it too hard).

Also some dude talked shit to me while we were teamed up for the entire match and ruined my mood.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

It's just ugly reality. Sometimes you end up on your ass, you'll get past it. Just stay motivated and professional.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I think "eviction" is the whole issue. You can't use law enforcement to remove someone who has used your home as theirs. It's a "civil matter", meaning even if you win they aren't removed on the spot.

Evicting someone who never signed an agreement is nuts but it's how it works.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

uwnim posted...

While I do think squatters should be allowed to put work into abandoned or unused property and claim ownership of it, this situation shouldnt be allowed to happen.
In this case, the squatter is not bringing a property back into use and improving the health of the market, they are just occupying a building that the owners were using.

If a squatter moves into someones home while they are on vacation, a business trip or other such things, the squatter should be forcibly removed.

If a squatter moves into a non-primary residence that hasnt been used in over a year, the owner and squatter should be required to negotiate a rental agreement.

If a squatter moves into a place that has been unused for more than 5 years, the property should be considered abandoned and the squatter should be able to request the government to legally transfer the property to the squatter.

I think the last paragraph is the most relevant one. No one should be allowed to take over a property without at least some attempt made to loop the legal owner into the process.


---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

You can also squat in a place by using AirBnB to pay in advance for a place then refuse to leave. Tenancy laws allow people to claim themselves as residents by paying 30 days worth of rent, depending on the locale. At that point the owner is required to use eviction laws to remove them.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

scar the 1 posted...

Squatting is generally defined as occupying an abandoned or otherwise unoccupied area. No squatter is going to throw someone out of their own home.

You underestimate how flexible the interpretation of this is. Squatters have successfully overtaken homes that have never been lived in because they had yet to be closed on and the law protects them from forcible removal.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Ilishe posted...

You can definitely do something about it with a shotgun

The problem seems to be if someone does that when you're not there and you don't deal with it immediately at the time it happens, it's like the situation flips on its head.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

...that tear up a place of business in the chaos make you a shit person?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

1NfamousACE_2 posted...

Break in the house and fight them

The weird thing is you'd probably be the one seen as guilty for doing that.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

MrToothHasYou posted...

Im fine with reforming squatters rights laws if we also completely end the practice of landlording.

That is an asinine way of looking at it.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Who posted?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Maybe I had it backwards but I thought Andrew Garfield was the one they were having trouble convincing.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Criminalt posted...

It's not unrealistic to believe there are, very likely, other people who are better than you at something...

I think everyone accepts that. What causes mental blocks is when people think their own ability excludes them from being among those people, even if it's not true.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Finding a compatible partner at a job is just a perk, I would never prioritize it.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

With regards to Neil Armstrong specifically, I can actually feel for him. He was a pilot before becoming an astronaut. Flew planes and made no real contributions to the knowledge community. Great at what he did, for sure, but certainly within a different scope to the alumni he was now standing among.

I'd probably feel out of place too with a background like that. Everyone else would probably find something worthwhile to recognize about my career but I among them would be sweating.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

pogo_rabid posted...

So, lets say you have 2 cars, you would be ok with someone appropriating one of them because you can't drove both at the same time?

I think the out clause here is if you drive it within a certain period of time it's still yours.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I feel unproven in a lot of things and I don't really understand the breadth or depth of my own ability and knowledge.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

It really bothers me because I was brought up to understand that profanity was unacceptable and I kind of wish I held true to that.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

gunplagirl posted...

It's based off old time-y laws from when it wasn't uncommon for a family to just abandon a home or everyone living in it to die. They definitely need to be updated though, to have some sort of "if the owner has occupied it within the last 6 months it's still theirs" requirement.

The implication someone is able to move into a property I own and never consented to already leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

>there are people here RIGHT NOW who were born after the first Tony Hawk's Pro Skater game released

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

(poll)

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

KStateKing17 posted...

He was the comment underneath

Oh at the VERY bottom. My eyes glanced over that.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

What_ posted...

Incels vs Batista

I thought that phrase was used with regards to abortion.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Where's Kevin Nash getting involved?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I mean COME ON...

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

...is u a bitch?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I don't think I've ever been a fan of Jim's content.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

What are my thoughts on it?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I assume this statement is being made about the global state of affairs and not just here in the US.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Bump.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

I feel like, if you're at an expensive restaurant, you're probably leaning more into wine or mixed drinks for dinner over water.

That might just be me, though, because I don't really like to drink water with food.

I went to Charthouse one time and had water and it was absolutely fantastic. So smooth and cool.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Muscles posted...

I feel like a lot of people would just go with water and they would end up losing money

Eh, true. Forgot you can just do that.

Although having drinks doesn't mean you necessarily lose money by not serving them.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Same soda you can get anywhere else, but it's $15 here because of the rest of the experience.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

DavidZ2844 posted...

Why, because its not a Nintendo character like this site is biased towards lol

edit: game not character, my bad

Why not just edit out the incorrect word...?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

g0ldie posted...

I have this but I never played through it.

I should check and see what the hubbub is about.

Just don't...get too greedy.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

DavidZ2844 posted...

Why, because its not a Nintendo character like this site is biased towards lol

No, because it's a game that was made after 2010.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1443319963469627398

WHAT THE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAASS?!!! Turn in your gamer licenses RIGHT FUCKING NOW.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Is this a reasonable response?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

I'm desperate for a community and Reddit has absolutely failed.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

...are you living your life wrong?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

K181 posted...

I'm not a sociopath, so yes... I would be troubled by the sight of an aftermath of a brutal decapitation.

I don't think being able to see something without reacting is the mark of a sociopath, necessarily. Everyone has their own standards. It might be unnerving but not so much to the point that you have to turn away.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

Like severed head. Right there. Blood everywhere. They clearly suffered.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

solosnake posted...

The trick is not caring if they ghost you.

So dating really is like going for a job interview then.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

bover_87 posted...

ITT every job ever is shit

Working for a living is the worst scam humanity has ever perpetrated.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

joe40001 posted...

I can...SORT of see how this might work but it's a faulty premise.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

If you have a massive real-life mental breakdown because you got banned from GameFAQs is that your own problem?

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.

nfearurspecimn posted...

no, I find it interesting to find out what people get into trouble for and who got in trouble

See I'm that way too.

One of the few undeniable bright spots of my job is whenever someone gets terminated we in the IT department get to see why they were terminated. So I get some joy out of that.

---

It is more important to use your anonymity to upset other people than it is to do anything productive.