Lurker > Kloe_Rinz

yes, that was your invitation to actually present an argument

when i said 'says who?'

that's not an insult

ll i've done is point out that you have nothing

you can go ahead and prove it wrong at any time

i've been trying to get you to discuss this

lol. i think you owe me an apology for calling me a brony

i'm really not the one having a melty here lol

i tried to get you to actually explain yourself

Not always viable

says who?

as if calling someone a brony isn't grade-school level

i shut you down

okay, does anyone worthwhile agree?

there's no fanfiction there

Hes a captain of the cold...

right, you don't have anything. no twisting there. are you done?

i'm not twisting anything

Ok bronie keep trolling

i'll take that as a 'no, i don't actually have anything. i spoke without thinking and i apologize.' apology accepted.

have fun getting fucked over by strangers then

Oh believe me I wish I did come up with the label for these kind of people and just because you've never heard it before doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Shall I give you some examples of the term being used?

I didn't invent the term. I wish I did.

Well, a true Atheist don't care about religion very much and an Internet Atheist cares way too much against religion.

Which part? You would have to basically shut yourself in a cell and never contact the outside world if you based your behavior on statistical anomalies.

I dont trust people because someone got stabbed this one time is a silly take. Ive trusted countless strangers and never been stabbed.

Not always viable

says who?

Tell me through gameplay

tbh I am over the cutscene and have been for many years, the industry needs to ditch them

I dont play games that make me wait more than 30 seconds between gameplay, not including load times

sexuality doesnt need to enhance or develop a character
its just something a character is

NIMBYs itt

"I want the homeless to shower, but it better not be my shower"

You gave your definition, and the one example you provided in no way fits your definition.

Even Dumbledore doesn't fit your asinine definition of "pandering", and I already addressed this:

In case you forgot, this is your "definition" of pandering:

Because you're nitpicking.

Because your definition of pandering is incomprehensible and we're trying to figure out what the hell you're referring to. >_>

Your dumbledore example doesn't even line up with what you originally said. <_<

How can we have a discussion if you don't provide some examples

If you are desperate to argue against a specific example for whatever inane reason you have, go back and argue against the dumbledore scenario I already gave you

Also, didn't call you a homophobe.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt by asking you to provide examples,

Usually when people complain about gay characters being "pandering", it's just veiled homophobia. And it sounds like you just want people to agree with you, even though you can't provide context.

It's hard to engage with your point if you don't provide any context.

So what are some examples that you have come across that caused you to form this opinion? I still don't fully know what you consider to be pandering because your definition doesn't apply to any characters that I can think of.

You made the claim

anyone to take your claim seriously

you need to back it up

Yep I read your posts. Like this one:

And this one:

Come back when you've got some examples.