Lurker > 1337toothbrush

Why? I don't give a shit about Tesla

I know how they work, which is why I understand carbon negativity being possible to achieve

Between this, and them making "officially endorsed" Stan Lee and Bob Ross NFTs, today is just generally super awful.

Can you explain your stance or are you just going to plug your ears and go "nope" all day?

The energy use for proof of stake blockchains is extremely insignificant. It's not hard at all for them to be neutral or negative.

Tezos is another good example.

$0

Carbon negative means taking out more than you produce

If you produce 0.5 tonnes and eliminate 1 tonne resulting from the profit of what produced the carbon, you're in the negatives.

That's literally what makes them negative

If a thing does something to produce carbon, and uses some of the profit to eliminate over 100% of that amount of carbon, carbon negativity has been achieved

They are helping to eliminate more carbon than they emit(which isn't a lot). Thus, carbon negative

Blockchains that consume an insignificant amount of energy can easily become carbon negative by purchasing carbon credits

Correct

They're carbon negative

What bullshit? There are quite a few carbon negative blockchains out there

btw This is crazyness

I started watching porn when I was like 11, Billiesaid. I think it really destroyed my brain and I feel incredibly devastated that I was exposed to so much porn.

This girl always seemed odd, this had to be one of the factors Why

Proof of Work blockchains are inefficient trash and consume too much power just to perform simple tasks, like creating and trading NFTs

Good Proof of Stake blockchains like Algorand are carbon negative so NFTs are fine there

ENZC is a Magicarp. Sucks right now but you'll be envious of our future Gyarados.

Subscriptions for remote starting isn't even new though