Lurker > WingsOfGood

mooreandrew58 posted...

I guess? Never saw the appeal of sucking a dildo though.

Apparently to dominatrix types that is the way to feel empowered.

Wow. Sickening.

What he still getting paid?

Society backlash should dissolve and punish police unions.

So many stories.

No.

If this was a toy she was wearing maybe diff story.

metallica846 posted...

He didnt look scared.

Was he supposed to be timid and scared to intruders on his property?

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Are you just completely ignorant to everything police do? It's pretty simple.

"Hello I'm Officer Hank and we got a report about someone driving recklessly and we wanted to ask you some questions. What's your name? Do you live here? Is this your vehicle? Where are you coming from? Did you drive straight home from there or did you take any detours? Have you had any alcohol or marijuana today? Would you mind taking a sobriety test? Is there a number we can reach you at if we have any additional questions?"

Then cross-reference security or traffic cameras if you want to get real ambitious.

In other words, harassing a man on his own property for no reason as that would not prove a crime.
So why are these questions important enough to break the law and take a dump on a man's property rights?

Also calling 100+ post thread a flopic.

gamer167 posted...

DP has already made you look foolish 10 times over in your own flopic and you keep charging forward so I know at this point youre trolling.

But yeah youre right, theres no way anyone could keep driving if a cop attempted to pull them over. /s

Lmao nice alt

If he kept driving then they wouldn't just want to talk fyi. He would have been tackled as soon as he exited the vehicle.

This did not happen because clearly he was home and out of the vehicle before the officer came. Ie, they saw nothing.

ShyOx posted...

They say

If you notice they're not releasing their videos of the incident, are they?

You gotta remember he thinks if a cop said it, it is fact.
The funny thing though is we know this is a lie as it contradicts actual fact that we see in the video.

darkprince45 posted...

If you read the article. The police saw him and he quickly drove into the driveway

Wait so your story now is, he had arrived on his home street and drove so wrecklessly the police did not turn on their lights and just followed him to his house and let him get out of the car and walk to his door?

Lmao

gamer167 posted...

You know that they didnt?

If they witnessed him doing anything he would have been pulled over.

They did not arrive till he was already at his door.

It is basic logic.

VipaGTS posted...

i think the call was for erratic driving? They didnt need to speak with him right then. He was clearly agitated. Leave and come back. Itll be fine. They most definitely did not need to speak with him
so badly that they needed to continue to piss him off and then shoot him with a bean bag. Why did they even have that equipment and so much back up for all that. Again, theyre not trained to de-escalate when they should be. Thats a problem. And if they suspected him of being drunk there is nothing they can do. He could have downed a bottle of whisky as soon as he stepped inside. They cant prove his driving was due to intoxication right then and there. The entire thing was bull shit.

Dun dun dun

But you know a certain someone would never admit this.

gamer167 posted...

If an officer cant be there to witness a crime themselves they have no reason to investigate it because someone else calls it in?

@gamer167

How ll they investigate reckless driving phone tip when man is out of his vehicle and home?

What if I called and reported you as recklessly driving? They should knock on your door and detain you? And what will happen? What would they find?

Knock knock knock

Is darkprince home?
Yea we got a call saying you drove recklessly. You are now under arrest.

darkprince45 posted...

what are you even saying? What are you watching is them trying to investigate and hes just going berserk yelling. Just stop bro

How will they investigate a crime they did not witness and whose witness is some random caller who may have been lying or gave the wrong info?

This all seems really dumb. Like I said, I can just find your address and tip cops off to you driving recklessly and they gonna show up to your house?
Hmm?

This was obviously racist.

darkprince45 posted...

yes I did. Youre just going to keep sealioning arent you.

Pretty Easy honestly. Sir we have a witness saying you committed x crime. We also observed it and saw you pull into your driveway. We now have probable cause to believe you committed x crime it. Now its either citr or jail depending on which state. But this gentlemen immediately started yelling at officers when he got out of the car instead of just calmly identifying himself

Oh so they weren't going to investigate at all?
They just believe a phone call and throw the man straight to jail?

You kepy saying "investigation" but that was apparently a lie huh?

You also claim they witness it. Hmm. I know cops lie on reports but wow.

darkprince45 posted...

I already answered this. Do you think the crime just stops because he steps out of the car? Not only was he observed by the caller. The police literally saw him park his vehicle in the driveway. You would know this if you read the actual articles and not just the video

You did not answer this.

How will they investigate? Explain.

darkprince45 posted...

dude, do you read, reckless driving is the crime. Thats what theyre investigating. Its not trespassing if police are investigating a crime. If you really want to get into it. Theyre standing on the sidewalk too which is public property

How are they investigating reckless driving when the man is not in a vehicle?

Holy

"We believe some crime has been committed. What crime we don't know and must discover. So we will now tresspass on your property"

That the gist of the police argument?

darkprince45 posted...

WHAT WHO SAID THAT. Dude learn to fucking read. Read terry stop. That doesnt give you the right to search.

it means you an officer that has reasonable suspicion( belief that a crime was committed or about to be) can stop and detain you for up to 60 minutes to conduct a lawful investigation.

this is what just happened at the bare minimum

you sealion so hard lmao

What crime did they believe was committed?

darkprince45 posted...

WHAT. Terry stop is from an armed robbery case and is the basis of all reason suspicious stops.

holy fuck. The amount of confidence you guys have when youre so ignorant

bro you are always so ignorant of every law in police topics. Im 100 percent certain you only operate on Reddit title threads

Wait, so you are now claiming they could search him because he had a firearm....

For a call that was about reckless driving.

No dice. Wow

Collat posted...

Glad he lived. Hopefully the cops get their asses sued. Slim chance though.

Public outrage will have their jobs at least.

darkprince45 posted...

. Please look up the Supreme Court case Terry Stop"

You are citing law involved in a traffic stop to explain why they are on property refusing to go away.
This is not a stop and frisk.
He was not pulled over.

Shablagoo posted...

One of the flaws in our justice system is how many street-level enforcers are completely ignorant of the law.

Well said and demonstrated by our resident officer.

Smh

darkprince45 posted...

not if an officer has probable cause for an investigation which he did.

How?

1. There is no reckless driving to investigate. There is no investigation that can be conducted

2. Dude actually asks the officer about this. The officer does not recite any probable cause as he had none.

3. I can call and say you are driving 90mph in a 50 zone and cops will show up to arrest you? BS
They won't.

@darkprince45

Also lmao at darkprince thinking a call about him being a reckless driver means anything.

If dude was reckless, how is he now at his home and no one in danger?

Better do what now? Arrest him for artiving home safely? Wtf is this idiocy

darkprince45 posted...

if someone just called you in as a reckless driver: police see you park in your driveway. Then youre immediately aggressive and then charge towards officers and they hit you with a beanbag. You then decide to pull out a gun and shoot officers. You are wrong.

Police were told to leave his property. They had no rights to be on it. They refused to leave.

He had the right to defend his property from armed tresspassers.

darkprince45 posted...

Idk if we watched the same video, but the guy was clearly the aggressor the entire time and was threatening police with a firearm?

if police have reasonable suspicion or PC to investigate a call they arent trespassing

You obviously didn't watch the video. You saw what fit your bias.

metallica846 posted...

Honest question. Wouldnt the virus continue to mutate in countries without good access to the vaccine like us? I know we can do better but isnt the evolution of Covid inevitable at this point?

I have already been fully vaccinated.

The vaccine is actually what causes it to mutate to be vaccine resistant.

It might mutate in a place where they are not vaccinated, but it would not be vaccine resistant from that.

@metallica846

Basically, antibiotic resistant bacteria need exposure to antibiotics to gain said resitance.

Fully vaccinated people foregoing mask protection will hasten this form of mutation as breakthrough cases rise.

Dude is triggered by "meaningful conversation"

Wutobliteration posted...

try your whole life, then come back

So you are desperate for sex such that this is all you can see?

This is what happens when fully vaccinated people sit around blamimg anti-vaxxers and DON'T WEAR MASKS OR SOCIAL DISTANCE because "I did my part".

They get infected while fully vaccinated and the virus mutates due to them being fully vaccinated.

But go on about how your maskless self is so superior and thank yourself when your laziness makes your vaccination worthless.

Wutobliteration posted...

Also to add, a lot of men do not crave love but just crave sex first and foremost. They'll crave love eventually when they get older.

Still, sex is better than no sex at all. I mean, it's not even a comparison. This is like asking, "is 1 more than 2"?

Now you are contradicting yourself.
Sex isn't meaningful conversation or sharing yourself with another person.

So is loneliness not utter despair as long as your dick gets wet?
You have one night stand with a stranger whose name your forgot and never see again and all the sudden you are no longer lonely?

Wutobliteration posted...

tell me, have you been alone before? single literally your whole life?
someone can keep telling themself all the motivational quotes they can find but eventually they'll still feel like crap and depressed.

social-belonging is a core tenet to Maslow's hierachy of needs. It's people like you who cant emphatise with how that feels like.

I have been alone and didn't feel utter despair.

Jabodie posted...

Well a couple of my exes certainly seemed to think so.

:(

Did you love them?

ManaYuka posted...

For guys, Sex is love

This is not true.

Wutobliteration posted...

you think you can just pluck a girlfriend from the sky? or even someone hot to have sex with?

like wow

Wtf. That has nothing to do with what I quoted.
You seem to think not having a gf means utter despair and loneliness.

I guess you are the type that craves validation every second and has a fragile ego.

Wutobliteration posted...

Really??

So why is literally every MCU actor hogging the leading roles in hollywood movies now?

Because the MCU takes no namers and make them the leading actors.

Wutobliteration posted...

The other is you being alone and being hopeless and in a never-ending despair in life.

?

Thing is, big movies make the stars.

Rey made Daisy Ridley

JLaw was made by Hunger Games

Etc.

But then again any movie Ryan Reynolds makes will be watched by his fans.

You might find someone hot and can have good sex with, but you don't really love them. You don't think "this is the most amazing person ever, why am i so lucky?"
You are not excited to always see them, etc.

C or D?

jeffhardyb0yz posted...

As an actor, it kind of hurts. He's right in a sense.

Nope. Their fault for being in bad movies like Will Smith and AfterEarth.

Lmao

That is their own fault for being in trash films and making people regret.

Quicksilver posted...

The CDC should have never said people don't need to wear masks. Now no one will wear a mask again along with a lot of companies pushing a things are back to normal narrative so people who are on the fence about a vaccine will be like why bother things are normal again. And the news media I watch used to really go hard on the virus coverage but now that Biden is president they put it on the back burner and are all about voting rights and the infamous so called insurrection. No one seems to take it seriously any more.

Well it wasn't wrong before delta. Thing is, delta came and they had no idea how it worked and were like "yea it basically the same, we all good!"
But now we know that was incorrect.

I thought Disney owned Jumanji

Up

pegusus123456 posted...

Just reading about it makes me mad. I look at the subreddit for my state and even the left wing users are being absolute morons about wearing masks because they got vaccinated.

Another interesting study:
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/ov460e/those_who_flout_covid_recommendations_are_less/

Those who flout COVID recommendations are less agreeable, have lower intellect, and tend to be more extroverted than those who adhere to recommendations. COVID non-conformists also prioritize self-interest and personal freedom and show greater tolerance for social deviance, a new study reports.

Some interesting comments:

Except this doesn't have to be a flu situation. We don't have "yearly measles" or "yearly chickenpox" because we snuffed those diseases out.
People and governments just need to sack up, punish non-compliers, and mandate vaccines. That's the only way out.

Except the vaccines do not function like chickenpox or measles vaccines, which actually do stop symptoms and transmission. Nobody is snuffing Covid out with vaccines that still allow for infection and transmission. Even the article referenced in this very thread is making this clear, hence the suggestion of still wearing masks.
We need to stop a "Mereks Disease" like situation happening where vaccinated people produce more severe strains due to the vaccines successfully stopping severe illness but not stopping infection or spread.

I learned a new term. "Leaky Vaccine"

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/leaky-vaccines-can-produce-stronger-versions-of-viruses-072715

Idk about calling this vaccine leaky but it seems some redditors think if vaccinated people can infect others it is.
Which wasn't the case until delta.

And delta came because India couldn't actually vaccinate their population.
This is just bad all around.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3

Vaccines are thought to be the best available solution for controlling the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the emergence of vaccine-resistant strains may come too rapidly for current vaccine developments to alleviate the health, economic and social consequences of the pandemic.
To quantify and characterize the risk of such a scenario, we created a SIR-derived model with initial stochastic dynamics of the vaccine-resistant strain to study the probability of its emergence and establishment. Using parameters realistically resembling SARS-CoV-2 transmission, we model a wave-like pattern of the pandemic and consider the impact of the rate of vaccination and the strength of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures on the probability of emergence of a resistant strain. As expected, we found that a fast rate of vaccination decreases the probability of emergence of a resistant strain.
Counterintuitively, when a relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions happened at a time when most individuals of the population have already been vaccinated the probability of emergence of a resistant strain was greatly increased. Consequently, we show that a period of transmission reduction close to the end of the vaccination campaign can substantially reduce the probability of resistant strain establishment. Our results suggest that policymakers and individuals should consider maintaining non-pharmaceutical interventions and transmission-reducing behaviours throughout the entire vaccination period.

Read that again:

Counterintuitively, when a relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions happened at a time when most individuals of the population have already been vaccinated the probability of emergence of a resistant strain was greatly increased.

Basically vaccinated people getting infected is kinda not a good thing. Mask up.

Solid Snake07 posted...

Not that it justifies the shooting but that guy's an idiot and lucky to be alive

What would you do if a trespasser with a gun stood on your property and refused to leave?

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/ovg7qr/corinth_police_fire_at_man_stepping_off_his_porch/

They had no reason to be on his property. He told them to go away.
They don't like being told what to do.