Lurker > Lebronwon

Im guessing it was an analyst pump on both IPOF and IPOD. Dont see news so i'm guessing it like what happened to GHVI other day. Someone on those stock shows went on and said something about it. I only have a couple of shares of both as a see what happens.

edit: Maybe this tweet has something to do with it. Either way I will ride it out since risk isn't that bad with 10 shares of both.

https://twitter.com/chamath/status/1363571801289154560


---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Anyone know what going on with IPOF? I can't seem to find any info on what is pumping it right now.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

up

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.thedailybeast.com/stop-listening-to-the-new-york-times-and-start-listening-to-porn-stars

Every morning for two months, hordes of people have misidentified a group of professionals as part of a global pedophile conspiracy. Im not talking about conspiracy theorists falsely accusing Comet Ping Pongs pizza delivery guy. Im discussing the aftermath of The New York Times Nicholas Kristof, religious fire-breathers, famous feminists, and tech reporters painting the porn industry as a sex-trafficking racket. In December, Kristof wrote a horrifying viral story about unverified users uploading child pornography and rape videos onto PH. You probably know what happened next: PH banned unverified users, and Visa and Mastercard suspended payments on PH. Everyone from MAGA senator/insurrectionist Josh Hawley, to liberal, feminist tech journalist Kara Swisher, to edgelord podcasters Dasha and Anna praised big finance for taking on big sex trafficking. I, too, would like to take on big sex trafficking because sex trafficking disgusts me. I would like to abolish the racket, but I have zero ideas on stopping sex trafficking because I dont work as a sex trafficker. Im a consenting adult performer working in the highly regulated, legal porn business. If sex trafficking occurs in legal porn, I have yet to see itand Ive worked in the adult business for a decade. Ive sold my self-made content on every legal clip site you can imagine, and Ive shot for every major porn studio (which, not to brag, but is a pretty big deal).

But the Times storys aftermath has harmed legal porn stars and done little to nothing to stop sex trafficking. The world has moved on to other viral stories, but porn stars are still reeling from the consequences of Kristofs sloppy report. Let me explain: PH only allowed consumers to buy content created by individuals who could prove their age. PH never allowed someone to buy unverified rape videos. By suspending card payments, Visa and Mastercard harmed porn stars who made legal videos and did little to stop sex traffickers. Many girls I know are now struggling financially, all while dealing with strangers calling them sex-traffickers on Twitter. These girls and legal porn production companies dont create the despicable, disgusting rape videos that Kristof describes. Say a criminal abducts someone, then sex-trafficks them in Iowa, and the perpetrator films the rape and uploads it online. That has nothing to do with the field I work in every day. When I go to shoot porn, I am following pages and pages of state and federal laws. California determines how and when I use a condom. The Communications Decency Act forces me to make sure I can prove everyone involved on set is of legal age. If I break a rule on set, a co-worker can call OSHA. On top of all this, the porn industry self-regulates, forcing everyone to get an STI test before shooting. I feel much safer filming porn than I did when I worked a minimum-wage job as a teenager. Porn is a highly-regulated profession a world away from sex trafficking, but I understand the publics confusion. Most people consume porn on PH, a distribution platform, so its easy to mistake the distributor for the producer. Its the same thing as when someone sees Netflix created Schitts Creek when the show first premiered on the CBC. Except, in this case, the public is falsely aligning legal consenting workers with sex traffickers.



---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzmgUCIEwbs




---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8WAMGe8x3M

tl:dw: Joe asks what could he do. What is the reason for him staying. Could he make it warm outside? Joe also says a Democrat mayor went to Mexico too.




---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Bio1590 posted...

Is he going to get hit for stock market manipulation again? Let's wait and see!

Probably not.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/two-nyc-bars-are-for-sale-asking-price-is-25-bitcoin-140805441.html

A long-time restaurant owner in New York City is looking to sell his two bars for bitcoin. Patrick Hughes put his side-by-side bars in Manhattans Hell's Kitchen neighborhood, Scruffy Duffy's and Hellcat Annie's, up for sale in January. The asking price? Twenty-five bitcoin (BTC-USD), or about $1.4 million at the current price. Hell also accept 800 ethereum (ETH-USD) tokens, which values the bars at nearly $1.6 million. I guess my point was that it was something new to attract a different type of buyer, get a little publicity, try to legitimize the currency a little bit, Hughes told Yahoo Finance Live. Hughes said he would accept U.S. dollars for the bars he just prefers bitcoin.

In case you were wondering, Hughes is a cryptocurrency investor. He bought bitcoin early on and sold all of his holdings when it hit $51,000 earlier this month and then immediately bought the competing cryptocurrency, ethereum. It's all going to be cryptocurrency eventually and I don't want to be holding U.S. dollars in a few years when inflation rears its ugly head again. Because it's coming, said Hughes. If he successfully sells his bars for bitcoin, Hughes could make history as the first known cryptocurrency restaurant sale in the U.S. I'd like to leave this business at the top of my game and to make a big splash, make a little history, and just go out on top. So I'd like to sell it for Bitcoin," he said. "I think it would be awesome.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-admits-on-twitter-that-bitcoin-and-ethereum-seem-high-2021-2

Elon Musk isn't one to shy away from speaking his mind on Twitter. In his latest social media comments, the Tesla chief admitted the price of bitcoin and ethereum "seem high" as the crypto assets hit record highs. Last night, bitcoin smashed through the $55,000 level, bringing the crypto's market cap to more than $1 trillion. Its latest rally has largely been attributed to Tesla's $1.5 billion purchase revealed in an SEC filing on Feb 8, sending Bitcoin up 16% on the day. Musk's comment was in reply to Peter Schiff, a well-known crypto skeptic and 'gold bug,' who claimed that gold was a better asset allocation than bitcoin or fiat currency. Schiff's was quoting Musk's tweet that bitcoin was a "less dumb" version of cash. "When fiat currency has negative real interest, only a fool wouldn't look elsewhere," Musk tweeted on February 19. "Bitcoin is almost as bs as fiat money. The key word is 'almost.'"

But Musk responded to the veteran stockbroker claiming that: "An email saying you have gold is not the same as having gold. You might as well have crypto. Money is just data that allows us to avoid the inconvenience of barter." An hour later, the Musk followed up with a post saying: "that said, BTC & ETH do seem high lol."



---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14102251/onlyfans-mum-kids-out-of-school/

A woman who rakes in 110,000 a MONTH on OF says she is being bullied by fellow mums after they discovered her account. Tiffany Poindexter, 44, from Northern California, believes other parents are trying to get her children kicked out of their school because of it. The OF model claims to be one of the most successful OF models in the world making 110,000 every month through the website. The mum of three boys, aged eight, 10 and 12, first started her account in 2019 as a way to spice up her relationship with husband Chris, 49, after the couple began experiencing marriage problems. Known online as Mrs Poindexter, she quickly rose to the top of the rankings earning $14,000 (9,982) in the first month alone for posing in lingerie while doing regular mum activities like cooking or cleaning. Tiffany believes her content is popular because its relatable and also credits the modelling for helping her improve her self-confidence. However, the family live in an affluent area made up of a close-knit Catholic community and claim to have received considerable backlash from people who dont approve of their OF account. Tiffany said: I felt pretty unsexy when I went through early menopause. One of the things we tried to make our marriage more exciting was posting a picture of me in a bikini on Reddit. It was Chris idea, and it became so popular that all these people started asking for more so we set up an OF and I just blew up. Its something we just completely fell into, we had no idea how successful it would become. We started in September 2019 and no one knew about it. No friends, family or anyone. "It was a sexy secret between me and my husband that was so exciting and fun. But things took a dark turn in July 2020 when neighbours and parents from the couple's childrens school found Tiffanys OF.

The mum claims they called her names and even printed out some of her photos and emailed them to the principal. She said: Someone came across my account and suddenly I had mums from school texting me and leaving voicemails saying I had to leave the school. Some women from my area actually printed out pictures I posted on my OF and mailed them to the principal of my childrens school. We were called a load of names; apparently it was 'disturbing, disgusting, horrifying' and 'my children should be kicked out!' Fortunately for the couple, the school principal reportedly chose not to get involved at that time. However, Tiffany claims she was removed as the 2nd grade room mother due to the complaints. She said: I was taken aback by this, as the implications are offensive as much as they are ironic, and it does make me sad. According to Tiffany, it wasnt just the childrens education that the mums tried to hinder. They reportedly also wrote to the local priest and bishop, as well as made a secret Facebook group to gossip about the family.

https://i.imgur.com/2snRqSQ.jpg



---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/19/us/asian-american-attack-trnd/index.html

An elementary school teacher's aide was waiting for a bus in Rosemead, California, when he was brutally attacked on Sunday, suffering a severed finger, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. A man on a bicycle approached Matthew Leung, who is Asian-American, at a bus stop in Rosemead, a suburb of Los Angeles, just after 1 p.m. They exchanged hellos, but about 10 minutes later, the man, unprovoked, attacked Leung, said May Cun, Leung's colleague at Gates Street Elementary School. Leung shielded his face with his hands during the attack and then he blacked out, Cun told CNN. A passerby found Leung bleeding on the ground and called for help. Leung, 51, was taken to the hospital. He told CNN affiliate KABC that he saw his finger injured while on the ambulance. "So when I go to the hospital the doctors see it and say oh no...so they cut it off," Leung told KABC. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department does not have a suspect description, but the assault is under investigation. It's not clear if race was a factor in the attack, the sheriff's department said.

The last few weeks have seen a string of attacks against Asian and Asian-American people, though police have not confirmed that race has played a role in the assaults. An 84-year-old man from Thailand died in late January after being attacked on his morning walk in San Francisco. Days later, a 91-year-old Asian man was violently shoved to the ground in Oakland's Chinatown. In early February, a 64-year-old woman was robbed outside a Vietnamese market in San Jose, California. And in the same week, a 61-year-old Filipino man was slashed in the face on the New York City subway.



---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://twitter.com/CeFaanKim/status/1362192082924896256

https://twitter.com/CeFaanKim/status/1362801952594268163

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

lilORANG posted...

TC doesn't know what "officially divorced" means

This. Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie divorce is still not finalized after all these years.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

The Trent posted...

Is that just a spac? What is it?

Yea it is a SPAC. Matterport is confirmed to be going public through it.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

For anyone wondering the CNBC guy who pumped GHVI. Said along the lines it was the Zoom, Netflix, Paypal of its field. With a lead over everyone.

No idea if it is true but thanks for the pump.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...

Step 1) pump
Step 2) dump

Am I missing anything?

Im just lucky I caught it was a CNBC pump instead of important news like a merger or deal happening.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

The Trent posted...

be sure to dump after the pump because pump and dump

I have dumped and waiting for a dip to reenter.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Lol you pump on Reddit. Lawmakers try to police them. These analyst and people pump on TV no issue.

Im benefiting from someone on CNBC pumping the stock GHVI. Jumped 20% in the last 5 minutes thanks to them pumping.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Those bitcoin stocks MARA and RIOT doing well today.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Vampire_Wreath posted...

I mean the media reported that Cathie Wood bought a bunch so this is the result

I looked at the positives and negatives some were saying companies were pulling out. So I went with the negative. I kinda did the opposite with UAVS there was a short report that tanked the stock and since it was a cheaper stock being under $10 compared to PLTR being around $26 gave that one a shot to flip at the open today.

UAVS bounced back so Im in the green either way. If I had more money to play with I could have took that PLTR chance but on to the next stock.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

lww99 posted...

If I sold pretty much everything at loss, do I need to worry about taxes lol

like I dont think I made any profit whatsoever

No you have to make money off stocks to pay taxes. And even then it depends on how much you make and how long you have held the stocks.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

PLTR having a bounce back day. I probably shouldn't have listened to the media on them.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

wallmasterz posted...

Not the best timing when my funds finally cleared. Im planning to throw some more money at ENZC once it seems safe.

Do you have any stocks that cost more than $5 a share?

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

Kinda wish I bought more stuff yesterday before the close. Buying UAVS to flip after the short report worked out. But yea today is looking like a green day based off the premarket.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

jeffhardyb0yz posted...

Today:
yesterday:

Lost 50k today. 40k yesterday. Over $115K this week. Rough week but still up in general thanks to some other stocks. Sold some ENZC back in the .80s just to secure some profits. Glad I did. Made a play on MCETS. Should have sold some HCMC at .0065. Gonna make some other moves tomorrow. Looking to unload HCMC at the end of the month. Hope ENZC stays down long enough for me to unload some of those profits onto it and hope to make some plays on a few micropennies within the next week or so. The last few days have sucked but we'll bounce back. Still not holding bags yet so that's good lol.

Wow. You must be rich where you can lose over $115k in 3 days and not be hurt much by it.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

makumaku posted...

Hi everyone. I left a post near the end of the last topic, so just posting back in here.
Just to throw it out there, I think tomorrow will be a great day to get into PLTR. I am most likely jumping in with 1-2k.
Any thoughts out there? Let me know!

Well here are two articles

First one is saying that stock is becoming the darling of WallStreetBets
https://www.wsj.com/articles/palantir-becomes-an-unlikely-darling-of-the-gamestop-crowd-11613680175

Second groups are cutting ties with them because ICE used them for raids
https://gothamist.com/news/majority-manhattan-da-candidates-pledge-sever-ties-palantir

My opinion is that those two articles don't look good for the company but it up to you how you want to take that info.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://twitter.com/wokestethoscope/status/1362511734095769601


---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

I'm down 2.3% on the day. Could have been worse but I made a last minute play to flip UAVS in the morning. Got it at 8.50 before the close. After forgetting to attempt an overnight flip into the open with EH yesterday.

---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7

https://nypost.com/2021/02/18/why-reddit-thinks-robinhood-is-the-2-billion-dogecoin-whale/

Reddit may have unmasked the top doge. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts on the site think Robinhood the investing app at the center of last months GameStop stock frenzy is the owner of a digital wallet stuffed with nearly $2 billion in dogecoin. The account which controls about 29 percent of all the dogecoin currently in circulation entered the spotlight this week after Tesla chief Elon Musk raised concerns about concentration in the meme-inspired cryptocurrencys ownership. A user called AndreiFromAlberta claimed to have solved the mystery in a lengthy post on Reddits dogecoin-focused message board. The wallet in question was created in February 2019 about seven months after Robinhood started offering dogecoin trades and received large amounts of dogecoin from other accounts that appear linked to Robinhood, according to the post. It almost certainly belongs to Robinhood, Tom Robinson, co-founder and chief scientist of the blockchain data firm Elliptic, told Bloomberg News, which reported on the speculation Wednesday. The timings of its creation, and the creation of the addresses that it received funds from, match the timings of Robinhoods support of Dogecoin. Musk himself appears to support the theory. In response to a Tuesday tweet positing that Robinhood might be the wallets owner, he said, Sounds like it is.




---

Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7