Lurker > MachineJaipur

World will be in pieces eventually when an asteroid doesnt miss

Some cats love walking.

If he did his job, he'd not have to fight so hard and then lose. He spent all year fighting to call the virus a hoax and an attack on him.

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) on Thursday said it was "stunning" for the White House to not issue a response regarding multiple alleged U.S. government cyber attacks stemming from Russia.
The senator from Utah tweeted an abbreviated version of the statement he told SiriusXMs Chief Washington Correspondent Olivier Knox in a prerecorded interview, noting the recent reports of Russian hacks into government agencies showed "alarming U.S. vulnerability" and "apparent cyber warfare weakness."
I think the White House needs to say something aggressive about what happened. This is almost as if you had a Russian bomber flying undetected over the country, including over the nation's capital, and not to respond in a setting like that is really stunning," Romney told Knox.
On Sunday, reports emerged showing that the U.S. Treasury Department and a Commerce Department agency had been breached by a Russian military intelligence unit known as "Cozy Bear," which is responsible for past hacks into government agencies.
The Republican senator's comments come one day after Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) voiced similar thoughts about the recent alleged Russian hacks, calling it "virtually a declaration of war by Russia on the United States and we should take that seriously.

President Trump has not addressed the latest hacks reported by Reuters on Sunday, and White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany said Tuesday the administration is "taking a hard look into this," CNBC reported.

The Hill reached out to the White House but did not immediately receive a response.President-elect Joe Biden has been outspoken regarding the latest suspected Russian hacking, saying his incoming national security team has been briefed by officials privy to the matter.
"My administration will make cybersecurity a top priority at every level of government and we will make dealing with this breach a top priority from the moment we take office, said Biden, later adding, "Our adversaries should know that, as president, I will not stand idly by in the face of cyber assaults on our nation."

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) told congressional staffers this week the perpetrator behind the alleged cyberattack is "highly sophisticated."

CISA officials further said that "it will take weeks, if not months, to determine the total number of agencies affected by the attack and the extent to which sensitive data and information may have been compromised.

There was that one security guard who was shot and killed for telling a customer to wear a mask.

people might try to fight you or revenge cough on you for calling them out.

Who wants to be that person to approach the stranger who has already proven they don't care about the rules?

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1339382084062883840

Why do they care

A lot of those are unhinge people. Remember when it was in the news about how Biden had two scoops of ice cream? Or how he fed the fish wrong when he was meeting the PM of Japan? Or how he tossed a paper towel? What a bunch of nuts.

Is Jill Biden even insisting she be called dr., or does she just sign stuff that way, as is obviously within her perogative as a doctor and conservatives are pretending that she would correct you if you referred to her as anything but doctor?

if she was a housewife that acted just like a stereotypical 50s woman they'd attack her for that.

Insisting on being called Doctor when you dont heal people

I want to punch every fucking idiot in the throat who keeps spewing this bullshit. It is easily researchable historical fact that the title originates in the academy.

Imagine of Trump fucks over the republican party for this. That would be glorious.

Large tax cuts for the rich don't lead to economic growth and employment, and instead cause higher income inequality, a new study that examined tax cuts over 50 years has suggested.
Tax cuts for the rich in 18 wealthy countries predominantly benefited the wealthy, according to a paper by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of King's College London.
"Our analysis finds strong evidence that cutting taxes on the rich increases income inequality but has no effect on growth or unemployment" in both the short- and long-term, the researchers wrote.
After major tax cuts for the rich are introduced, the top 1% share of pre-tax national income increases by almost 1%, they found.
This counters arguments that tax cuts for the rich cause a "trickle down" effect that benefits other people, which the researchers noted has been part of the rationale for major tax reforms in the US.
Supporters say that tax cuts for the rich will lead to wealthy individuals putting in more hours and effort at work, which in turn will boost economic activity, the researchers said. Other arguments for "trickle down" tax cuts include that allowing the wealthy to invest more benefits the economy as a whole.
Hope and Limberg analyzed major tax cuts for the rich in 18 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, including the US, Japan, and Norway, between 1965 and 2015.
Top incomes have risen rapidly since the 1980s but as they've grown, more tax cuts for the wealthy have been introduced, the researchers said.
The researchers said their results were in line with a 2014 paper published in the economic policy edition of the American Economic Journal, which suggested that lower taxes on the rich cause high earners to seek pay rises.
"Cutting taxes on the rich increases top income shares, but has little effect on economic performance," Hope and Limberg concluded.
Taxes have come under scrutiny during the pandemic as countries look for ways to fund their COVID-19 relief efforts.
Earlier this month, Argentina passed a one-off "millionaire tax" to help pay for its pandemic response. Less than one in 100 earners will pay the tax, which the government hopes will raise $3.78 billion.
UK experts have also called for a similar one-time wealth tax, which the Wealth Tax Commission say could raise 260 billion (just over $348 billion) in five years.
And in July, 83 millionaires including Ben & Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield and Disney heiress Abigail Disney signed a letter asking for higher taxes on the super-rich to pay for COVID-19 recoveries.
In an opinion piece for Business Insider, Max Burns, a veteran Democratic strategist, said that President Donald Trump's COVID-19 relief proposal in August, which included a 50% cut in weekly emergency unemployment payments and a proposed payroll tax cut, was "just another tax cut for the wealthy in disguise."

are you even a CEer if theres no feet option?

Go to horny jail

This, just destroy all your content because it's easier than tracking down and removing the .001% of it that's problematic. Fuck them and their site as much as the people who posted the bad stuff and the assholes who made them out to be worse than Hitler

What exactly is the "treason"?

I'm not being sarcastic or joking here. Where the fuck is the clear public interest value with Trump's tweets? All he does is tweet shit to rile his base up and cause division. It is literally harming our country.

Yeah, you never hear these hardcore anti-government types complain about police killing them when you'd figure they'd be outraged at big government killing innocent citizens.

Here's a question Mr. Stalin and it's you who must decide
When atomic bombs start falling do you have a place to hide?

Same. I've never understood how you're meant to even wear them. They're either super uncomfortable or fall out. Maybe it's just my ears.

https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold/status/1338569207827607553