Lurker > WingsOfGood

it is.

i guess the question is why don't you consider it a terrorist group.

Anyone who takes dating coaches seriously will literally never find love. This includes dating coaches themselves.

Since when did tinder become a dating app instead of a casual sex with strangers app?

What context makes it right to require a Masters for $15/hour

But once you get more good pics of yourself on there you're gonna be getting laid every night

That's 100% affecting your matches. Do not ever put more than one selfie on Tinder. You need these pics at least:

* Full body picture
* Pic of you doing something fun
* Pic of you and your dog/cat. Or you with someone else's dog/cat lol

What are your pics? I can give you some helpful pointers

If you're under 6' definitely don't put your height, lol. Get your foot in the door first and let them get to know you and if they walk based on that fact alone when you're already face-to-face, they weren't worth it anyway.

just dont give a fuck

post all of your interests, your hobbies, what you do for a living, what your goals are. if you have any pics of you with friends, post those. be yourself

be attractive and wealthy

It was probably a mistake

i feel sorry for The Mountain's girl.

her puss must be in a post-apocalyptic state by now... >_>

Not that I remember but just yesterday I saw on IG that this girl finally got with one of her long time beta orbiters that she had been rejecting for years

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/78655365

I wonder the same thing! I think the average lifespan of an outdoor cat is around 6 years... When cats can easily live to 15-20

God doesn't fucking exist

Does God even lift?

I actually grade every woman I see on a 1-10 scale based on attractiveness and assumed social status. Wealth constitutes a good 2 point bump, though anything smaller than DD breasts is a point off for each size down (or each size up, because large breasts are trashy). Boy I sure do love breaking down attraction to bite-size pseudoscientific components to fill all this free time I have living in the dark as I rationalize my inability to connect with other people on an emotional level. Oops, would you look at the time, I'm about to be late for my biweekly trip to the Starbucks across town. I've memorized the work schedule of a cute barista who works there and it's only a matter of time before bombarding her with my superior male logic opens up her legs and I can finally know what a vagina feels like. Wish me luck, good sirs.

i never get to see any women =/

besides my mom. but she's a woman.

let's see how this neet mgtow logic plays out in the real world

Some men age like fine wine. Most look like balding lumps and few are financially successful enough to pull hot young women that will disregard their beer guts.

Yeah, that makes sense tbh. I see now what you're going for.

You won't be able to become without said realization. Sure, you got work ahead of you.

I feel it's the other way around. You have to actually become the catch before you realise it, otherwise you're just deluding yourself

It comes down to the motive behind it.
Doing it because you like her and want to do something nice? Fine. Perfectly fine.

Men have the potential to be

I feel like a lot of us squander it though

This whole topic flies in the face of glorious milfs

shut the fuck up tc

I'd sort of agree in that high value men are even bigger catches, but that only occurs over the long run, and even then it's mostly with the well-off guys.

she's hot and cool and older than me, and I post on CE, so...

Mostly true when men used to be sole providers. Now most households are maintained by a woman.

idk my wife's in her 30s and I find her more attractive than any 20 something. She's turned into a sexy woman instead of a cute girl

Hillary Clinton continues to hover in the wings, ready to step forward should Joe Biden fail.
Dont look now, but Joe is failing. Not only has his campaign been rocked by sexual assault allegations from one-time staffer Tara Reade, but the public is beginning to give up on the former vice president. A new Emerson College poll showed 57 percent of likely voters think President Trump will win reelection in November.
Remember, Establishment Democrats put forward Uncle Joe because he was the safe candidate, bound to defeat Trump. Oops.
Thats not the only problem that crops up in the Emerson Poll. It also shows Trump supporters 19 points more enthusiastic about their candidate than Biden supporters. That enthusiasm gap will drive turnout this fall. With Democrats dependent on young people and minorities, both typically less reliable voters, that lack of excitement for the candidate could be a big problem.

Also less than gung-ho about Biden is, predictably, Bernie Sanderss army. Though the Vermont socialist has endorsed Biden, 51 percent of Bernie supporters are, according to Emerson, open to voting for a third-party candidate.
Another red flag is Bidens tepid fund-raising; according to the New York Times, Trump has a monster cash advantage of $187 million. Further, in swing-state polling, the presumptive Democratic nominee is running behind where Hillary Clinton stood at this point in the race, and we know how that turned out.
As all of those issues cast doubt on Bidens prospects, the presumptive nominee must now fend off Tara Reades allegations, which put #MeToo-supporting Democrats into an incredibly awkward spot.
None of this augurs well for the Biden campaign, which will likely confront further obstacles in the months ahead. Eventually, the coronavirus will no longer excuse the former VPs invisibility; he will have to engage in the kind of give-and-take that often shows him getting befuddled, including real not scripted town halls and interviews.
At that point, the public will see what numerous Democrats have noted sotto voce Obamas former wing-man is struggling with some cognitive decline.
We really cannot elect a president who mixes up his sister with his wife or who collapses in mid-sentence, unsure of where hes going next.
Democrats obstacle to pushing Biden aside is Bernie Sanders. The Vermont senator was the runner-up in the primaries, and continues to hold onto his delegates. Democratic leaders do not want to see Sanders resurgent; they are convinced he is unelectable. But they also know that if they move to replace Biden at the top of the ticket, and dont elevate Sanders, the Bernie Bros would revolt.
Indeed, it seems clear that party officials are so worried Sanders might stage another run that they cancelled the 224-delegate rich New York State primary. They claimed the vote would have been dangerous in that epicenter of COVID-19, but since they still plan to host a primary for state and local officials, that excuse seems weak.
As the primaries roll forward, and especially with officials thumbs on the scales, Biden will almost certainly win the candidacy. In the absence of a brokered convention, how could Democrats replace their standard-bearer?
One idea has been to convince Biden to step aside in favor of the very popular Michelle Obama, seen as a sure bet to beat Trump. So far, though, the former first lady has reportedly rebuffed all invitations to enter the fray.
That leaves Hillary Clinton. Biden could choose Clinton as his running mate, and then step down before the election and allow Hillary to run in his place.
Clinton is the only VP candidate who would be able to pull off such a last-minute switch. She has the team, the resources and the experience to be the nominee; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), former Georgia state Rep. Stacey Abrams and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) do not.
Clinton is ready and eager. She is desperate to avenge her 2016 loss (which she still blames on Putin) and has pumped up her public profile to keep herself in consideration. In past months she has conducted endless interviews, promoted the uber-flattering four-part Hulu film about herself, made headlines by attacking Bernie Sanders and Mark Zuckerberg, and fired unending broadsides against President Trump.
Most recently, she joined Vice President Biden in a town hall devoted to womens issues, during which she effusively endorsed her long-time colleague. She reminisced about their time together in the Obama administration, talked about their mutual love of Scranton, Pa., where her father grew up, and recalled meetings in the Situation Room.
In fact, Clinton talked so much about their shared history that it was easy to forget that she was endorsing Joe Biden. It almost sounded as though she were touting her own resume instead.
Maybe she was.
How would Hillary stack up as a nominee this time around? Hillary certainly looks stronger and more fired-up than Biden; she has the energy he lacks. She has a bigger following on social media (28 million Twitter followers, compared to 5 million, for instance) and she has a large devoted following who, like Hillary, still cannot believe she lost in 2016.
She could count on President Obama to campaign for her, as Biden also can, and she would also have ever-popular husband Bill helping out. In 2016, Democrats were not wildly excited about her candidacy, but her enthusiasm readings were better than Bidens today. As was her polling in critical battleground states.
Hillary is hideously polarizing, but she would be a more forceful nominee than Biden, has enormous name recognition and, perhaps most important, can begin and end a sentence without major detours. And, she has not been credibly accused of sexual assault.
Hillary may be Democrats nominee of last resort. You know she wants it.

You'll be fine, and also drunk.