Lurker > Jakyl25

Worse than Rogan by far
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Lenin is no good
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

HeroDelTiempo17 posted...

Voting in overwhelming margins diminishes the ability to successfully and credibly rig elections so it's still the play.

Right. I dont think its rigged like, say, Putins elections are rigged

The rigging here is done systemically, not via direct action
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

red sox 777 posted...

Uh, if you really believe an election is rigged, voting in it absolutely hurts your cause.

Then why did Trump vote in 2016?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

SmartMuffin posted...

It's an implicit endorsement of the idea that voting is legitimate

Hey, I might personally think a violent Marxist rebellion is the only way, but I dont presume to be objectively right! And no amount of voting decreases the chance of that happening
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Interference to me is just part of the psychology of the match

It can either enhance or detract based on how much sense it makes and how it affects crowd reaction, just like any other spot
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

I agree. I also always vote because its no harm to me so why not?

Its just not really going to solve anything, but I also accept the chance that Im totally wrong so I cover my bases
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Kenri posted...

Either way all I'm doing is voting for them at every opportunity, so I don't really see the difference I guess.

https://twitter.com/dubj/status/1223635131296034816?s=21
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

MoogleKupo141 posted...

George Bush is an already public figure who verifiably did start that war

this Chinese scientist guy is someone no one has ever heard of who maybe had nothing to do with the virus outbreak

none of this is me saying I believe the Chinese governments official story, I just think its irresponsible to accuse some guy of being involved and share his personal information without real evidence

I think its the difference between the government and a citizen

ABSOLUTELY harass the Chinese government

ABSOLUTELY DONT intimidate individual people
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Kenri posted...

the alternative is this same thing, except Trump, so y'all have kind of forced our hand there.

No, the alternative is is USE the Democratic Party as useful idiots, a means to an end. Not to support them.
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Imagine continuing to support a political party
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Do Not Congratulate
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Looks like targeted harassment to me
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

https://twitter.com/chrisjollyhale/status/1223442238509850624?s=21

Preach Rashida
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Everybody hates Mitt
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

https://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1223379382003294208?s=21

I cant stop smiling at this
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Trump cannot be happy that even the people voting to acquit are calling the Perfect Phone Call inappropriate
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

In Clinton's case, many said he did it but it wasn't impeachable.

And thats what theyre saying now
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

In this context Im construing best politician as being best at getting his agenda through
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

TheRock1525 posted...

Wonder if you'll still agree with this when he loses his majority.

Granted hes helped some by the awful format of the Senate, but to remain in power as long as he has despite being so unpopular, and with his party being the less popular party, and with the only person in his party that people like being the political nincompoop Donald Trump, its really impressive
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

banananor posted...

You can't just say the house has failed without explaining how. Are you trolling?

Trump obstructed Congress, and congress submitted articles of impeachment including obstruction of Congress. What more do you want?

You have have the least curious mind to think the house is the one in the wrong here.

All presidents should be able to avoid impeachment by just not responding to it, and bogging the process down as much as possible?

That's so obviously unacceptable

I think shes actually using Congress here in the both houses of Congress manner
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

I also dont know how we are at a low point of division in a country that had an actual civil war
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

What was the justification for acquitting Bill Clinton? He committed perjury and anyone who thinks he didnt is deluding themselves
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

It is correct to what they mean.

What they mean is technically incorrect though
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

The ordinary person correlates gender and sex as the same and is referring to biological sex of what they biologically see in front of them when using a pronoun. They aren't trying to interpret what your brain waves say.

See? Singular they/them. Its not so hard!
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

The ordinary person correlates gender and sex as the same and is referring to biological sex of what they biologically see in front of them when using a pronoun. They aren't trying to interpret what your brain waves say.

Maybe so, but thats still not technically correct, as you claimed it was
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

If they wish not to have a gender, they can be called it if they wish. They them is plural. It's dumb and illogical and at that point being ridiculous

Singular they/them has existed in the language forever
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Those are slurs. The issue here is with someone calling someone by the technically correct term not realizing someone wishes to be called otherwise.

Its not technically correct though

Youre not calling them male/female in a biological manner.

Trans men are men. Trans women are women.
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Probably not. Just like I wouldn't call someone daddy who asks to be called that who isn't. The usage requested there is illogical to the point of patronizing. It is basically asking me to do something illogical to show adherence to them. Basically to show subservience.

That said. I am a huge softie so maybe I would if I felt they in earnest wanted that for genuine reasons, but it would be a game time decision on the spot just because it is basically a patronization vs earnest thing at that point.

You think many non-binary people are not earnest?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

How often do you hear people say f**, r*****, or the n word?

In Corriks circles....
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

red sox 777 posted...

If Trump announced that he wanted everyone to refer to him by the pronoun "Supreme Leader" would you?

Thats a proper noun
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

red sox 777 posted...

But you don't really have a right to control what other people call you. When you tell someone to address you as X you are giving a command. Usually that will be followed but if that's the first thing you say to a person, well it creates an atmosphere of hostility.

And we have another way to declare preferred pronouns - names! You have full control over what you use as your name (you don't have to use your legal name).

Uhhh are names not also a command?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Lol

If someone wanted you to use they/them pronouns to refer to them, would you?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Is there literally so much sensitivity that if someone misgenders you at first you can't handle it? Like, the people who are gonna abuse you for that are going to abuse you regardless if you have your preferred pronouns listed or not. That's why it just makes you look like a sensitive tool to do it.

Imagine having to do it often, in every online conversation.

Wouldnt it be easier on you at that point to just declare it up front?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Yeah, that will never happen. They will just make fun of the people they would have normally the same way they would have identified them otherwise. And, they will also make fun of the banner pronoun people as well.

Like, I wouldn't make fun of someone for their gender or what they wish to be called. But, I will tell you how ridiculous people are who do pronouns. And, especially ones who take it a step further to be "they".

Ok so yeah, its to help stop abuse from people like you then if you cant handle non-binary people existing.
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

red sox 777 posted...

This kind of thing is a tremendous vote winner for the Republican Party.

I know, which is why we need violent revolution
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

Is there literally so much sensitivity that if someone misgenders you at first you can't handle it? Like, the people who are gonna abuse you for that are going to abuse you regardless if you have your preferred pronouns listed or not. That's why it just makes you look like a sensitive tool to do it.

The point is that if everyone does it, whether they are cis or trans [or enby!], transphobes wont know who to target just by having pronouns declared
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Im not doubting that there are some people who do it just to be smug about it

But the general concept is to help shield trans people from abuse.
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Wanglicious posted...

er... Bernie is definitely more left than Warren is, though she's pandering harder to the fringe of the left that deals with identity politics a lot. if that's what you mean then yes, Trump performs better against that. i wouldn't consider Bloomberg over Sanders for that aspect either - he's trying to get that crowd won over too. it's only a matter of time until we hear a "Bloomberg, he/him" out of his mouth.

What is the problem with displaying your pronouns that people get so disdainful about?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Ok thank you
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Corrik7 posted...

No. Trump is draining the swamp.

So you really believe this is happening
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

TheRock1525 posted...

I don't think the Senate can vote for that.

Mitch will probably find a way
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

LordoftheMorons posted...

Lamar's explanation: Trump did it and his conduct was "inappropriate", but he buys into the bullshit "not impeachable" argument, with a dash of "not bipartisan" and "let the voters decide":

https://twitter.com/SenAlexander/status/1223093577145864194

Very disappointing

Hey its what I said the Senate should do all along! Vote that Trump is guilty of what the articles allege but refuse to remove him for it.

It would at least be honest!
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Oh ok.

I would just like to see Republicans start going after him, to see if it drives moderates away
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Can the Senate impeach Chief Justice Roberts for refusing to read Rand Pauls question naming the whistleblower?
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

He caught a quick snap of himself from the past trying to kill himself in the present

Some kind of Looper scenario
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Remember the original plan was for him to put over Lars at WM
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

Cena also is trying to build a career in Hollywood which has a much different image of the Saudis than Vince does, so its up to you to determine how cynical you want to be about WHY he refuses
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

It should also be noted that Mustafa Ali always donates that entire paycheck to a clean drinking water charity
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large

FFDragon posted...

This is true.

Who all refuses to go? I think Bryan does, and Sami is lol banned.

Bryan, Owens, and Cena refuse

Sami is banned

Aleister is held back by WWE because theyre not sure how all his satanic tattoos will be perceived
---

Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large