Lurker > Frolex
LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 2:29:01 AM #137 | and there he goes agian. now to see if he's got a third tab open --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 2:26:49 AM #133 | |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 2:24:10 AM #130 | Mark_DeRosa posted... Is it any worse than being blocked and knowing what I posted?? actually yeah because i don't need to open two accounts to see your shitposts --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 2:23:23 AM #129 | This dude really be staying logged in on two accounts so he can keep track of the people he blocked without risk of embarrassing himself further in an argument lol --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 2:12:06 AM #114 | fucking lmao, did darkprince literally just 1350 this topic? https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Alt-right_glossary#13.25 What an embarrassment, no wonder he's hiding from me --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:48:54 AM #88 | Mark_DeRosa posted... Yep, just posting this on my ult in case you missed it. Anyone that cant have a discussion without acting like hairistotle or acting smug is not worth having a discussion with. Bye How long do you think he's going to wait on this account just to make sure he gets a response before he blocks me again lmao? oh, and here's a parting gift before you do that since I might not get a chance to give it to you again: https://www.hookedonphonics.com/ --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:44:23 AM #83 | |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:37:44 AM #76 | Ruvan22 posted...
Stop, if you don't make him do the work on his own, he'll never learn. --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:24:50 AM #66 | Kobe Bryant posted... These young virtue signaling "rebels" ignore statistics, they'd rather believe sensationalistic TV news I don't think darkprince is that young --- |
| Topic | I am a progressive, but my views don't reside on the left. |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:23:19 AM #4 | Forgettable posted... Is this a new copypasta? We can make it one --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:20:30 AM #62 | darkprince45 posted... again? Your post how? still need help getting through them? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:17:33 AM #59 | darkprince45 posted... nope. This board rhetoric is using the same talking points that have been proven false or 30-40 years old. Then you guys love to have a gotcha moment by using such limited in scope studies which studies itt are limited in scope? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:12:03 AM #54 | darkprince45 posted... You guys love to cry wolf after you start it lol I've been nothing but cordial and accommodating to you, how could you say such a thing D: --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:10:38 AM #52 | darkprince45 posted... im not frustrated at all btw, Im not one resorting to being sarcastic and insulting. but you flamed me tho :'( --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:05:08 AM #45 | darkprince45 posted... Another great gatekeeper of the left. To join the like minded aggressive minds of hairistotle, MFKbass, and vipas. Never actually discuss anything, just say how awful everyone is despite and resort to being toxic immediately No need to get overdramatic about just because you're getting frustrated now. Would you like me to show you how to use this thing called "context clues" to get through things easier? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:03:15 AM #41 | |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/08/20 12:01:21 AM #35 | darkprince45 posted... Im not responding to someone with a keyboard warrior attitude. Shave your neck beard and learn to talk to someone in a tone that doesnt make you sound like a word I dont want to say A word you don't want to say, or a word that's difficult for you to pronounce? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:58:06 PM #29 | darkprince45 posted... Arrests towards black people have gone down each year while white people increasing How you coming along with those articles btw sport? come across a word you need my help sounding out yet? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:51:41 PM #25 | darkprince45 posted... i think all of your links but one show New York, champ. Ah I see, the problem here seems to be that you actually can't read. Go over those studies again, and come back to me when you get to a word that you have trouble with, and we can go through it together. I know we all need a little helping hand sometimes, and I'm a patient person when it comes to the needs of others. --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:42:30 PM #21 | darkprince45 posted... Yes, so meaningless that we base off an entire countries police over NYPD statistics. Who ITT has done that, champ? --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:38:40 PM #18 | darkprince45 posted... I guess we base all policing stats off NYPD now whoa meaningless shitposting from darkprince45, what a shock. kick me, i must be dreaming, dawg --- |
| Topic | Due to SJW backlash, creators removed Elmer Fudd's gun in Looney Tunes remake. |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:11:40 PM #30 | IHeartRadiation posted... Is Scythe Fudd still in the same Canon as MeatCanyon Bugs Bunny? Yes, that episode is the canon reason he doesn't use a gun anymore --- |
| Topic | Systemic police racism is a myth. This is about police brutality (proof inside). |
| Frolex 06/07/20 11:09:44 PM #10 | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05376.pdf We start with standard benchmark and outcome analyses of North Carolina traffic stops. Table 1 shows that the search rate for black drivers (5.4%) and Hispanic drivers (4.1%) is higher than for whites drivers (3.1%). Moreover, when searched, the rate of recovering contraband on blacks (29%) and Hispanics (19%) is lower than when searching whites (32%). Thus both the benchmark and outcome tests point to discrimination in search decisions against blacks and Hispanics. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854 The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49 times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on average. Furthermore, the results of multi-level modeling show that there exists significant heterogeneity across counties in the extent of racial bias in police shootings, with some counties showing relative risk ratios of 20 to 1 or more. https://www.nyclu.org/en/stop-and-frisk-data An analysis by the NYCLU revealed that innocent New Yorkers have been subjected to police stops and street interrogations more than 5 million times since 2002, and that Black and Latinx communities continue to be the overwhelming target of these tactics. At the height of stop-and-frisk in 2011 under the Bloomberg administration, over 685,000 people were stopped. Nearly 9 out of 10 stopped-and-frisked New Yorkers have been completely innocent. https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2017/05/30/1702413114.full.pdf We find that officers speak with consistently less respect toward black versus white community members, even after controlling for the race of the officer, the severity of the infraction, the location of the stop, and the outcome of the stop. Such disparities in common, everyday interactions between police and the communities they serve have important implications for procedural justice and the building of policecommunity trust. https://bit.ly/3cGiOO7 cross the city, black people were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white, non-Hispanic people over the past three years, The New York Times found. Hispanic people were arrested at five times the rate of white people. In Manhattan, the gap is even starker: Black people there were arrested at 15 times the rate of white people. An analysis by The Times found that fact did not fully explain the racial disparity. Instead, among neighborhoods where people called about marijuana at the same rate, the police almost always made arrests at a higher rate in the area with more black residents, The Times found. https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/jus14-warcomeshome-report-web-rel1.pdf The numbers become even more troubling when examining the racial breakdowns for search warrants. Of the deployments in which all of the people impacted were minorities, the deployment was for the purpose of executing a search warrant in 80 percent of cases, and where the people impacted were a mix of white people and minorities, the deployment was for the purpose of executing a search warrant in 84 percent of cases. In contrast, when all of the people impacted were white, the purpose was to execute a search warrant in 65 percent of cases. When the number of people impacted by a deployment was known, 42 percent of people impacted by a SWAT deployment to execute a search warrant were Black and 12 percent were Latino. So overall, of the people impacted by deployments for warrants, 54 percent were minorities. In contrast, nearly half of the people impacted by deployments involving hostage, barricade, or active shooter scenarios were white, whereas only 22 percent were minorities (the rest were people who were known to have been impacted by hostage, barricade, or active shooter scenarios but whose race was not known, so the difference could be even greater). https://www.aclu.org/report/report-war-marijuana-black-and-white?redirect=criminal-law-reform/war-marijuana-black-and-white Marijuana use is roughly equal among Blacks and whites, yet Blacks are 3.73 times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession. http://faculty.cwsl.edu/benner/aaRacialDisparityinNarcoticsSearchWarrants.pdf As seen in Table 29 below, Whites were significantly underrepresented while Hispanics and Blacks were significantly over-represented as targets of narcotics search warrants issued in the county as a whole. http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf The best national evidence on drug use shows that African Americans and whites use illegal drugs at about the same rate. Nonetheless, African Americans are about five times as likely to go to prison for drug possession as whitesand judging from exonerations, innocent black people are about 12 times more likely to be convicted of drug crimes than innocent white people. Now go away, It's well past your bedtime, and that's an actual "fact" --- |
| Topic | Do people rushing to get in a joke on a public forum... |
| Frolex 06/07/20 8:03:49 AM #2 | |
| Topic | Do you think people who got #MeToo'd are relieved now? |
| Frolex 06/06/20 9:11:02 AM #3 | that karen dog owner who called the cops on that guy like two days before this all went down caught the luckiest break of her life --- |
| Topic | Who was infected at the end of The Thing (SPOILERS)? |
| Frolex 06/06/20 2:41:42 AM #4 | ToadallyAwesome posted... I liked the theory that Childs isnt showing his breath where Macready is sold me. It's wrong tho. Not only can you see Child's breath clearly visible at several points during that scene, earlier in the movie you can very obviously see Thing Benning's breath when he screams during his transformation. --- |
| Topic | Tucker Carlson trying to cancel celebrities lmao |
| Frolex 06/06/20 1:18:06 AM #10 | wtf, he's stealing that gamer guy's bit, he should sue --- |
| Topic | If you know of someone who's blocking deupd_u, please let me know |
| Frolex 06/05/20 7:28:54 AM #12 | spudger posted... its too early for another deupd melty --- |
| Topic | Man who killed Ahmaud Arbery called him N word after murdering him |
| Frolex 06/04/20 9:03:04 PM #61 | |
| Topic | Games you used to love but now hate |
| Frolex 06/04/20 7:05:16 AM #7 | BlockAddition posted... Even if you don't like the game itself, anybody can find fun just messing around with the physics I can have fun messing around with physics in Fallout 76 too --- |
| Topic | Games you used to love but now hate |
| Frolex 06/04/20 6:58:00 AM #5 | Sonic Adventure well maybe not hate but its not very good --- |
| Topic | is this the dumbest gunfight ever in a movie? |
| Frolex 06/03/20 10:07:18 PM #24 | |
| Topic | Has your dad ever pissed you off at a fast food joint by fingering you over? |
| Frolex 06/03/20 3:17:13 PM #26 | It's the sequel to "I can't believe my mom stooped so low" I always knew i didn't want --- |
| Topic | TIL the Rodney King beating is in Terminator 2 |
| Frolex 06/02/20 8:48:50 AM #14 | Garioshi posted... George Holliday (the guy who shot the video) was on set for T2. No he wasn't. He literally just lived in a house that was near the filming location. --- |
| Topic | This looks like Michael Scott edited a propaganda video |
| Frolex 06/02/20 7:58:03 AM #1 | |
| Topic | TIL the Rodney King beating is in Terminator 2 |
| Frolex 06/02/20 1:46:38 AM #7 | don't think that's true. the filming location for the bar scene was indeed near where they beat him, but I don't think they were shooting on the day it happened. --- |
| Topic | Trump Supporter Kills Peaceful Protester |
| Frolex 06/01/20 2:58:41 AM #71 | Finis-XII posted... Already disproven, troll harder. this https://twitter.com/OWHnews/status/1267218218885799938 sorry champ, looks like your little buddy will have to wait at least a little while longer before he gets away with murdering an innocent. --- |
| Topic | Trump Supporter Kills Peaceful Protester |
| Frolex 06/01/20 2:04:43 AM #51 | DarkChozoGhost posted... He set out with the intention of murdering a black person, and did that. --- |
| Topic | Did Milkman come back? |
| Frolex 05/31/20 11:10:26 PM #8 | https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.6.user=milkman6 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.6.user=milkman7 looks like he tried to comeback twice and got BTFO'd both times and gave up Delirious_Beard posted... maybe he finally took his meds otherwise, TheGreatGeno6 posted... He may have, as generic conservatroll alt #214? --- |
| Topic | Video emerges of sword wielding man in Dallas lunging at protestors |
| Frolex 05/31/20 3:25:06 AM #47 | Dude wasn't defending his store, he went out with a machete to pick a fight with protestors https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/hundreds-march-through-downtown-dallas-on-2nd-day-of-protests/2379107/ The man went to the 2200 block of N. Lamar Street, which is where the House of Blues is located, carrying a machete, "allegedly to protect his neighborhood," police said. --- |
| Topic | Antifa is showing Black Protesters how to do an uprising |
| Frolex 05/31/20 12:43:16 AM #2 | |
| Topic | Overweight white man brings bow + arrow to protest. Has his car burnt. |
| Frolex 05/30/20 10:33:54 PM #28 | When you try to act in the streets like you act when you're voting --- |
| Topic | Remember Paul Luther from Eternal Darkness? |
| Frolex 05/30/20 10:49:23 AM #2 | |
| Topic | Trump didn't lie about looting and shooting |
| Frolex 05/30/20 10:09:45 AM #34 | |
| Topic | They've breached ross dress for less. Deploy child soldiers |
| Frolex 05/30/20 9:31:08 AM #19 | ....no seriously what the fuck is going on here? --- |
| Topic | Do you support charges being filed against the 3 other cops who were fired? |
| Frolex 05/29/20 7:18:43 PM #8 | |
| Topic | If men have no legal say in if women keeps baby, should they HAVE to pay C.S.? |
| Frolex 05/29/20 7:01:50 PM #349 | cuttin_in_farm posted...
For the 100th time, child support is about BOTH parents responsibility to provide for their child, and what their contribution is expected to be relative. In a case of extreme disparity between the income of the mother and father, it very well may be that one parent has no or minimal income contribution. but the mere fact that both parents have different levels of income contribution, even if the primary custodial parent is the one with the higher income, does not absolve the other parent of their financial responsibilities to their kid cuttin_in_farm posted... Because it doesnt even matter if the father still sees the kid. He STILL pays the mother child support despite spending time with the kid. Correct, the fact that the father "still sees" their child doesn't mean they are only financially responsible for them on the days they see them. Their child support payment can be adjusted to account for the contributions they make on the days they do have custody, but that payment doesn't automatically go to zero just because of it. cuttin_in_farm posted...
The ability of random strangers on the internet to keep their composure is neither my responsibility nor my interest. --- |
| Topic | Minneapolis bus drivers refuse to transport protesters to jail |
| Frolex 05/29/20 3:28:24 PM #21 | |
| Topic | If men have no legal say in if women keeps baby, should they HAVE to pay C.S.? |
| Frolex 05/29/20 3:22:38 PM #334 | cuttin_in_farm posted... Because either way, insulting others or their arguments will make it harder for you to do it. People will naturally ignore your points to spite because it lowers your credibility. If someone's willing to argue poorly out of spite because they don't like my tone, then I'm not too concerned about how cordial I should be with them in the first place. cuttin_in_farm posted... This is subjective on whats a childs best interest. I think we both agree that bread and water means they need more. But to ise your analogy previously, what happens if the mother isnt even using the child support money for the child? Instead she is using to spend her money on watches and clothes instead? Now instead of child support, its parent support. The father is no longer paying for the child, but the mother. Do you not think this is an issue? Or do you think this doesnt happen? Every jurisdiction has different rules regarding how child support payments should be earmarked or what approved expenses they can be used for and so on. I doubt any significant amount of them callout the use of the money for parents purchasing jewelry as approved. But even if i'm to take the "welfare queen" argument for granted, the fact there may be hypothetical women out there squandering child support checks wouldn't justify re-orienting our priorities on child support from providing for children to minimizing how much money men are required to pay in child support. cuttin_in_farm posted... What constitutes enough? Is the mothers happiness a factor? If she cant afford her child a new phone, but can get a two year old one, does that mean thats not maximizing a childs well-being?All excellent questions to consider, which is why child support payment amounts are judge on a case by cases basis, rather than assigning a flat fee for all parents to pay. cuttin_in_farm posted... I dunno what the difference even is here. Youre arguing for men (or whoever) being forced to always contribute to the well being of the child they may not have wanted even if it doesnt make economic sense to do so, yes? Because whether or not you're responsible for a child isn't about whether that child is financially beneficial to you. Child rearing in general is going to be a financial detriment to parents. They're people, not investments. Once you bring a child into society, you take responsibility for them, whether you like it or not. cuttin_in_farm posted... Because if a guy is contributing his income, and the woman can provide things of quality to the child without issue, why should a guy have to contribute more if he gets a pay increase? Were arent talking about bread and water diets. I've already explained this to you multiple times, and i literally don't know how I can make it any more simple without explaining it to you in finger puppets. Child support is not about whether or not one parent can meet some bare minimum standard of care before the other parent is absolved of their parental responsibility. Child support is about deciding what a child's best interest is and how each parent is capable of fulfilling those needs. If you are more capable, your contribution will be expected to match that capability. Now please, when you ask me to explain this again, do me a favor and be specific about which word is giving you trouble cuttin_in_farm posted... But theres a point where the only use of child support past a certain threshold is to just harm the father. Which is, once again, why we adjust payment amounts to income level so that economic "harm" fathers feel for feeding their kids isn't more than they can reasonably afford --- |
| Topic | If men have no legal say in if women keeps baby, should they HAVE to pay C.S.? |
| Frolex 05/29/20 1:55:24 PM #329 | Again, if you were actually capable of reading in this topic, i don't believe only men or only women bear financial burden for a child. They both do. You're the one who lead this argument off about women leeching vasts sums of money off men. Mothers and fathers both are obligated at providing for a child's best interests, and both should be held equally accountable to whatever child support judgements are handed down in court. It's not about some bullshit gotcha you're trying to pull about women being too weak support a child on their own, it's about the fact that a child receiving as much support as is feasible from both parents is the best outcome for both the child and society writ large . if you'd rather prioritize the sanctity of "a man's money", that's fine, but at least own up to that instead of trying to claim you're arguing for economic justice for fathers --- |
| Board List |
