Lurker > NeoShadowhen

nativengine posted...

NeoShadowhen posted...

I believe TC. Its not that outlandish of a claim. Theres been hundreds of people on that show and theyre all normal people with lives. Also, too random to set off the bs meter. You probably still gave out too much info, though.

Since youre sharing, perhaps youll indulge my curiosity. What do you do for a career? Also, if it isnt too personal, how did you end up as a single dad with two kids?

I sell industrial LEDs, mostly in the US but Ive sold lights in Kiev, Dubai, Melbourne, Belfast and most recently Liverpool. Ex wife bailed, she wasnt ready to be a mom 10 years ago and my oldest and her were consistently at odds. Even at 6 my oldest always gave her mom a hard time.

Wait, so how old are your kids?

I believe TC. Its not that outlandish of a claim. Theres been hundreds of people on that show and theyre all normal people with lives. Also, too random to set off the bs meter. You probably still gave out too much info, though.

Since youre sharing, perhaps youll indulge my curiosity. What do you do for a career? Also, if it isnt too personal, how did you end up as a single dad with two kids?

Wow.

They really raked him over the coals for that stance.

I didnt until my freshman year of college and the girl I was showering with commented about it. your poor feet... were her words. She then washed my feet.

Thanks for the trip down memory lane and the accompanying quarter-chub.

Who the fuck voted for world war z.

Show yourself!!!

Im a bit late to the party on this latest one.
Whats the context on this whole chosen one thing?

SailorGoon posted...

NeoShadowhen posted...

SailorGoon posted...

Even the schemey ones are mostly men. When that affair site Ashley Madison got hacked, they found it was like 3/4 men using it mostly for affairs

Id say thats less compelling. The easy counter argument would be that theyre on such a site because its harder for them so they use more avenues. Women wouldnt need to resort to such tactics because its easier for them. Thats what they would say.

I would say that both of your examples demonstrate that men are more reckless about it.

Even if that's the inference you want to draw away, then what statistics can you bring that would say women cheat more. Like, on what basis can you make the claim that "women are more likely to cheat because it's easier for them". Does anybody have anything to substantiate that claim with anything other than "limitless Chad dick"?

No, they probably dont.

Sometimes I am blessed with one day shipping. Got thats office tray organizer lickity split.

SailorGoon posted...

Even the schemey ones are mostly men. When that affair site Ashley Madison got hacked, they found it was like 3/4 men using it mostly for affairs

Id say thats less compelling. The easy counter argument would be that theyre on such a site because its harder for them so they use more avenues. Women wouldnt need to resort to such tactics because its easier for them. Thats what they would say.

I would say that both of your examples demonstrate that men are more reckless about it.

Id do it for a million. Money up front, and access to phone calls and/or FaceTime.

SailorGoon posted...

HypnoCoosh posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

HypnoCoosh posted...

Flockaveli posted...

Why is it so hard for women to be faithful?

Because a woman can get slammed in two seconds and a guy can hunt for slash for weeks.

There's a big difference it's super easy for basically any half-way decent female to get pegged.

Like TC repeated.....this is TWO married couples cheating lol. A man and a woman both cheating. take your incel pity party elsewhere

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

I get that. But in general everything I said stands true. Girls can get pegged in a second hence the answer to the question.

Okay, but they don't. National surveys show that only 15% of women have had extramarital affairs while 25% percent of men have them.

Thats telling, and probably the best data that we could expect to get, but I dont typically put much stock in surveys like that.

Who the hell would be truthful on something like that about something they dont want to get out? Apparently a lot of people. I just dont get it. I guess my point is, there is an indeterminable number of sneaky shits in society who wont be truthful.

It seems like if she was gonna fuck around then she wouldnt have brought it up in the first place.

How long did they date, how long have you been dating, and how long ago did they break up.

Ive been thinking about going back to a flip phone anyway. 15% will last days. Cha-Ching.

It really depends if they try to pull any shenanigans.

Slicing out content to sell later, season passes, dlcs, horse armor, collectors editions, loot boxes... all that kind of bullshit. I dont trust any of these companies anymore.

RdVEHfJqAvUPIbk posted...

codey posted...

I mean Django Unchained got two Oscars and several more nominations and it's way more extreme than Blazing Saddles and is pretty f***ing hilarious itself.

Wait that's a comedy? I thought it was some real serious movie. It's a literal comedy?

No.

That movie would be a pretty good litmus test for people.

Finish inside her.

There are redheads on my dads side of the family and on both sides of my wifes family. We knew wed have a one in four chance of having a redhead. Sure enough, first one is a redhead. Not ginger though. He describes his hair as copper. Kinda looks like a penny.

ModLogic posted...

darkjedilink posted...

But I thought words were violence?

fighting words if i recall some vicitms use as a defense for their violence

People who use the term fighting words that way are misinformed and incorrect.

The Fighting Words Doctrine would apply to this case though. In favor of the officer.

I was capable of seeing both, but in the first split second my brain registered bird.

The reason that socioeconomic privilege is downplayed is because oftentimes the activists pushing these ideas have a fair bit of that, and they dont like being called out like that.

As to why TC used this show as an example upon which to hang so much of the argument for privilege dynamics, I think it was a poor attempt at humor. Or that is their only significant contact with minorities. Probably humor.

I installed one on an existing toilet.

Unless I completely misunderstood the trilogy, wouldnt a reboot actually make more sense than most movies?

Also, didnt like, all the characters...you know...die?

I think the biggest issue would be accessing the money.

Although, I guess Ill just be boning up on Spanish.

Probably end up in one of those medical oddities write ups for just flat out losing a language with no capability of reclaiming it, but for some reason can learn other languages.

Regardless, I cant see how it wouldnt take quite a while to access the funds.

pogo_rabid posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

Vermont is hippies

Maybe in one or two areas, but the rest is proper redneck trump territory. Same thing with CT, it's pretty red outside of the cities.

And New Hampshire also. Theres more trump signs in the lakes region than in the southern states. I think its to piss off the Massachusetts people who go up there during the summer.

Sunhawk posted...

NeoShadowhen posted...

Sunhawk posted...

Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, Massachucetts and Conneticut.

What do you think of New England in general?

Its a very interesting place.

Theres a significant difference between lower New England, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island, and northern New England Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.

Southern New England is more in line with the mid Atlantic states, and doesnt have much of a unique identity from them.

Northern New England is what people generally think of when they think of that area. Basically the further north you go the more... backwoods it gets. Vermont is full of aging hippies and can barely keep their state afloat, New Hampshire is full of guns and cheap booze, and Maine is lobster infested coastal towns.

New England sounds great. It just seems so...remote and quiet. And I didn't know that thing about Vermont and hippies. Can you explain more? Why did they bunch up there?

There was a big migration of hippies up to Vermont in the 70s. They started a shit load of communes and were all dedicated to living off the land and all that. Eventually reality set in and they just kinda morphed into the state. Most of the hippies are old now. Its a pretty interesting state. Lowest crime rate, and gun regulations that would probably make your eyes bug out in disbelief.

Sunhawk posted...

Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, Massachucetts and Conneticut.

What do you think of New England in general?

Its a very interesting place.

Theres a significant difference between lower New England, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island, and northern New England Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.

Southern New England is more in line with the mid Atlantic states, and doesnt have much of a unique identity from them.

Northern New England is what people generally think of when they think of that area. Basically the further north you go the more... backwoods it gets. Vermont is full of aging hippies and can barely keep their state afloat, New Hampshire is full of guns and cheap booze, and Maine is lobster infested coastal towns.

saspa posted...

Crash posted...

saspa posted...

I always hated kramer out of all the characters when I was younger but ever since that controversy I like his character a lot more now knowing he's racist, because it shows. I always got that vibe from Kramer whenever I'd watch an episode of Seinfeld and it's just nice to be vindicated.

Can you elaborate on what he did in the show that made you feel this way?

The puerto rican episode, and just the way he interacted with black actors on the show. It's more of a sixth sense thing that you'll only pick up on if you're a minority like us, it's something not particular overt as to be described tangibly.

So...magic.
Fascinating.

Nah its easy. Just stop polluting the ocean and make it more profitable to preserve rainforests than to cut them down. Problem solved, crisis averted.

Give me another one Im on a roll.

Ghetto_Turtle posted...

UnhndredDescole posted...

Thats a disturbing ass title

took 15 posts to point this out....ce is fucked

Im sure it was intentional. TC is always subtlety hinting at being a serial killer. Hopefully its just a gimmick.

You arent immune? How old are you?

No_U_L7 posted...

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



Btk wasnt caught until 2005...

After 14 years of being inactive. And they murdered ten people over a 16 year active period. I think this show is handling them correctly. Very slow burn. There certainly isnt going to be a huge chunk of a season with a thrilling conclusion.

SpiralDrift posted...

People actually watch this shit?

Older people do. I think the audience is mostly the over 60 and kinda boring crowd.

EvalAngell posted...

this kid again?

Hes a man now.

Two wolves would look the coolest. For pure power Id probably give the edge to the three Rottweilers, but I feel like in a direct matchup between them and a mountain lion it could go either way.

I believe them because I trust them

ROBANN_88 posted...

Wait, really?
I thought that was a joke

Why? Its not a ridiculous proposition. Its certainly less ridiculous than visiting Denmark.

Hexenherz posted...

NeoShadowhen posted...

Hexenherz posted...

Zikten posted...

I always noticed for some reason there is a lot of Indian stuff on netflix. compared to other countries shows.

Yeah, I noticed that too. On Amazon they have a fair amount, too. I guess it's just because their movie industry is so big?

I'm also impressed at their horror stuff, I saw this other Indian movie called "Horror Story" and it wasn't like mindblowing but it was pretty well done (got bad reviews though, don't know why).

Was there dancing?

Nope it was just a straight up freaky horror flick about these college kids who go to this creepy ass hotel and start experiencing weird stuff.

Well, thats probably why it got bad reviews.

hockeybub89 posted...

Antifa is literally not a group

What is your definition of a group?

Hexenherz posted...

Zikten posted...

I always noticed for some reason there is a lot of Indian stuff on netflix. compared to other countries shows.

Yeah, I noticed that too. On Amazon they have a fair amount, too. I guess it's just because their movie industry is so big?

I'm also impressed at their horror stuff, I saw this other Indian movie called "Horror Story" and it wasn't like mindblowing but it was pretty well done (got bad reviews though, don't know why).

Was there dancing?

GregShmedley posted...

It's frightening how there are actually people who believe irradicating a breed is an ethical and proper solution to problem that revolves around irresponsible dog owners, often with malicious intentions of owning the dog.

Whats another solution? You wont be able to change those people, so make sure any other solutions doesnt rely on that.

meestermj posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

Ah yeah the classic Chihuahuas are more aggressive argument.

As if they're somehow not less dangerous than a really big rat.

They are statistically less likely to attack a human being.
That is scientific, irrefutable fact.
The level of damage they can cause is not what's being discussed.
Hell Dobermans, German shepherds, and rottweilers all rank higher in human aggression and have similar (and some stronger) bit force.

And yet, pit bulls cause more problems. Because theyre cheap. Nobody is going to be neglectful and shitty to their 2000 dollar Doberman puppy.
Its absolutely an owner issue. Although that might be the point you were arguing also. Either way.

Not quite sure theres an easy solution to this. Its not like the shitty owners ever take them to the vet or anything.

coh posted...

Its obvious the Clintons were behind it

No it was trump!

Its important we keep the back and forth finger pointing alive. We have a nice little dichotomy going and we cant wreck that.

Also, remember that Acosta is evil and behind stuff too, and cant be trusted or believed. Especially when he gave the twist away in the first 15 minutes. Which was a lie. Because evil.

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

Middle hope posted...

UPDATE: Looks like the dogs were confirmed to be pit bulls, and the owner is in custody.

I also see people on facebook defending the dogs, even 1 calling them "nanny dogs". Why?

Bc people use them as nanny dogs. They are fierce protectors. And sweet as pie. Unless someone raises them to be assholes.

Yup. The sweetest dog Ive ever had was a pit mix. So empathetic. Dumb as a rock though.

Despite all that though, they really need to go extinct. Just spay and neuter until it works itself out. It also wouldnt hurt to make it illegal for most people to own them at all.

Alucard188 posted...

I would tell the kid to leave the dog and her puppies alone, and haul her colicky baby ass away. Dogs aren't toys, and especially double that for puppies. Little kid's lucky the dog didn't attack her.

The thing is, the dog probably recognized the kid as essentially being a puppy.

Shablagoo posted...

Forget the kid, Im way more made at the parents/whoever is filming. Fuck them.

Yeah of course the kids behavior was annoying but he may not have known better.

Yeah thats pretty much the takeaway.

Yup.

Next step is to find out that shes not actually your sister, but is instead your cousin. On your moms side. Or whichever one is better in that society. Is it the daughter of your moms sister thats hitting the jackpot?
One of you people know.

Anyway, odds are that your sister already knows this and thats what is causing the crazy mixed up emotions within her.

boxington posted...

^ idk if the guy in the OP is in the same kinda situation, but I had a 21 year old going to my high school, taking regular classes.

but my school was known for its basketball and football teams, and I think that the dude was an athlete.

and when I was in the seventh grade, there was a 16 year old in the grade above me, but I'm not sure if he went on to high school.

The really fucked up thing with sports heavy school districts is sometimes parents will hold them back for no reason other than to get them a bit older in high school. Usually do it really early like kindergarten.