Lurker > dioxxys

Did they add that VR patch yet? If so I might be interested.

If I had a dollar every-time I read or heard the "This game launched as a pile of shit but now it's really good guys I swear!" line I'd have a couple hundred dollars. No offense, but I'm extremely cynical as a result of being a victim of Peter Molyneux.

But I feel like it's a bad sign when a game, only years after release comes to realize some of what it's pitch was.

Youll plateau at 208..

had a stepdad that was a total creep that would put full hardcore porn pictures from magazines up all over the garage

really gross considering he shared the house with my mom and me, my younger brother, and his elderly parents

We got a second dog back when our first turned 10 and it helped to keep him young.
We had to put our old boy down a few months ago and still having our little guy around has been an immense help.

As for region locked content if you don't live in North America then you can't access a shitload of the content.

dioxxys posted...

because all of the focus is on women

Its really not. In American porn? No way.

Probably no one will mention this, but one thing I find really interesting about JAV is that theres way more scenes where a male is getting his nipples played with. Thats almost nonexistent in American professional porn.

Can't help but feel like if child support wasn't forced on the parent who didn't want the child (and also had no say) the girl would still be alive.

She was really upset because she was pregnant and she had been trying to get rid of her child through unhealthy ways, like going out, drinking a lot and doing drugs. She was 17 weeks pregnant. She was not handling it well. Brandon found out but he was dating someone else. He wanted her to get an abortion but i think morally she didn't want to do it.

What.

You know what fucks up your life more than a baby? Getting convicted for murder

ASlaveObeys posted...

Let's be real, kid was being a bully but this isn't worth the charge. Race isn't relevant here, but that's the world we live in.

Based on the information given, how can you possibly come to the conclusion that the kid was being a bully?

dioxxys posted...

But you speak as though all of the peoples rules for sex was written in stone, sex communications are rarely even done on a basic level. In fact, most sex is wild and unplanned and can happen instantaneously, yes even with the expectation of a condom. I have had many girls who want to start with condoms and I eventually convince them to go raw with me, because it feels better for both of us. Also many girls claim to be able to feel the difference.

Sure. And you can do that is the US. Just dont do it in Sweden. They have their rules and laws for their own reasons. Maybe stealthing is a big problem there. Maybe it is here, but nobody cares. Also, I can believe some have. But most people seem to either go raw or with condoms. It seems unlikely that a lot of people are starting with condoms and ripping them off halfway through because it feels better. They already knew it would feel better without the condoms. Most of the time, the only ones who dont/wont know that are virgins. Also, in your case, it seems that the female wants it, too. So, theres that.

I can understand where hes coming from. It doesnt seem likely that many people want to start with a condom and then tell you to take it off. People seem to like to use them if they dont believe youre clean or as another form of birth control (normally when not on the pill). Or to be safe. And if they made you wear a condom for one of those reasons, it does seem unlikely that they would ask you to take it off because they feel better. Especially if they already had sex before... and knew how it felt with both a condom and without one.

dioxxys posted...

I have had many girls who want to start with condoms and I eventually convince them to go raw with me, because it feels better for both of us. Also many girls claim to be able to feel the difference.

I don't believe a word you typed.

dioxxys posted...

Bugmeat posted...

greenmist01 posted...

Apparently in Sweden......(correct me if im wrong here), apparently, if a woman consents to sex with a man, provided he wears a condom, but during the sex, the man takes off the condom, and then puts his penis into her vagina and continues the sex, its rape.

If true, I don't see a problem with this.

I do, you can have misunderstandings about this and miscommunicate things that could lead to man being punished for something as simple as not wearing protection and try to equate that to forceful unwarranted sex.

That isnt what is being described

If a guy intentionally removes a condom without his partner knowing or consenting to unprotected sex then that guy is in no way a victim in the situation

greenmist01 posted...

Apparently in Sweden......(correct me if im wrong here), apparently, if a woman consents to sex with a man, provided he wears a condom, but during the sex, the man takes off the condom, and then puts his penis into her vagina and continues the sex, its rape.

If true, I don't see a problem with this.

shut up, Zeus, not everything is about you, ok?

This is a creepy fucking topic.

dioxxys posted...

Does anyone want to actually explain better what implications means?

*Woman and man are alone*

"We are alone together don't you understand the implications? We might as well have sex since that's already what people think we are doing, okay? lolololol"

The implications in this context means creating an environment or scenario where a woman believes she may be harmed if she refuses sexual advances

The funny thing is that schools dont take food stamps and anyone who qualified for food stamps would also qualify for free food from the school.

you're suggesting their getting put in foster care is preferential to this? you had a rough life, but that's insane, at their ages no one will be interested in adoption, ok?

and uprooting them and placing them with total strangers with zero interest in their future success is just as despicable as their parents behavior, ok?

dioxxys posted...

Age of consent is actually just for sex .

To get married most states require you to be 18. However there is a minimum age at which you can get the consent of the parents to marry their son/daughter. This minium age is usually the age of consent but in some cases is as low as age fourteen.

Just curious... once you marry someone under the AOC with parent consent, is it now legal for you to have sex with the minor assuming he or she gives consent?

Who cares if black civilians are killing each other? There's a big problem when a police force is killing black people unjustifiably(not saying every black person killed by police is unjustifiable).

racism

Agreed. It's one of them.

Fam_Fam posted...

so you believe that sports leagues should all be co-ed? including things like MMA and boxing?

I'm just believing the feminists that women are capable of doing everything that men are capable of and are equal to men in all aspects. Thus, they can defend themselves. Don't believe in sexual dimorphism; it's a construct of the patriarchy.

Most likely, you will say most of those are bad ideas. That's only common sense

Because women face a very real risk of being attacked, raped or killed.

I dont know how about you ask yourselves the same question? You know since....Men are not the only ones in command of the english language?

winter that girl does not look of age

It's more merciful but it's also more barbaric. At any rate, your "argument" is generally ridiculous and stupid, just like the death penalty.