Lurker > Nemu

I don't really get their motivations, and they're quite stupid.

I like the manga, but the art style looked pretty bad from the trailer. Is the animation good or choppy?

Who gets to define who is a nazi or fascist? I don't really trust the definition to hold, what with all the non-nazis that have been called nazis over the last few years.

Sounds like either a massive exaggeration or possibly even nonsense, but fuck anyone who feels violence is a proper response to a fucking hat if it did happen.

I think there is the very real possibility of overly progressive parents taking to heart the momentary whims of toddlers and starting them down a path that will hurt them later in life. I doubt it's a very high number, but I'm sure such people do exist.

Sounds about on the same level of stupidity of the "wives can't be raped" laws some places have had.

It seems like a pointless distinction. They're both interconnected.

The idea that one must belong to one of either two parties is pretty dumb in the first place. People become too rigidly stuck on the idea that it's basically only two lines of thought when there could easily be dozens of parties (ones that matter, not the various little parties that get 1-4% of the vote).

Was the whole underage thing ever proven true or false? That is really the only part of it that matters. The rest is two stupid people who couldn't just get divorced without alerting the social media world to it.

There are certainly negative aspects to the generalized definition of masculinity that negatively affect individuals and society. I think the term itself is often poorly defined and used maliciously by people with specific agendas. The most extreme of those agendas seem to treat masculinity as bad and femininity as good.

Just use another term then. At this point, everyone has completely associated it with masked violence seekers not smart enough to tell the difference between a nazi and literally anything that is not a nazi.

It's always funny hearing about one sided open relationships. In the very few cases it does work, both sides need to take advantage of it to make any sense. Unless they're literally a "professional" cuckold, there is no way only one person doing it can ever be healthy.

I'm sure the community isn't without barriers, but I doubt there are that many professional female gamers in the first place. There are some spaces where gender representation depends entirely on interest in that space. Barriers of entry should be broken down where they exist, but the fact that there aren't any women isn't an inherent problem in itself unless they can show without a doubt it is because of said barriers. It may just very well be not that many women are in the space, so the likelihood of making top 100 is much lower.

Yeah, for the most part you can just sit there spamming attacks while tanking damage if needed. It's only the boss rushes that really even require blocking.

I'd say everyone got equally fucked up regardless of their sex, so it's just this woman being a baby because she doesn't like the politics of Tarantino. This is no different than the whole X-Men billboard outrage because before being a superhero/villain Mystique must be equated to a battered woman.

The two biggest were about rape, but you have everything from being falsely accused to being creepy to being an abuser to being an actual rapist, so the phrase seems correct.

Not after what happened to the couch.

There are certain things men and women will do differently, including shitty, horrible men and women. I'm sure if you narrow down a crime to "people who drown their children," it's probably in favor of women. That's not to say the phenomenon is a non-issue, but this framing seems dumb.

Larson had horrible, bitchy PR before the movie came out, and she has a bit of the militant feminist mindset to her. The movie itself was fine, if fairly middle of the road for the last film before End Game.

I'd be fine with it if it was full Netflix for games, or the games had any kind of guarantee that you have access to them on a second platform should the Stadia die. But no way am I ever paying for a game I don't even get to download permanently should their servers shut down.

We're going to have a solid 10-20 years of uncanny valley shit before anything really good happens. I don't know if I'd ever want to use one regardless. It just seems weird.

This seems like a surprised Pikachu face moment.

That's definite parody, but it is scary that people believe stuff like that.

I'd be fine with it as long as they're not some big name who has done some extraordinary amount of videos. I'm not against people having had previous partners, but I don't think I could get over like three hundred people, all on video.

Educations seems to be improperly weighted towards certain subjects, and there isn't a lot of room for individuality in public schools. Pumping in money to allow for more targeted, personalized education would be good.

I've always wondered why it really matters if they are or aren't. Unless it's literally hacking votes, it's still up to the individual to cast their vote.

Having more individual bathrooms is an option, but that would create a space issue in many places so it wouldn't be feasible.

FrankGoreHOF posted...

So I'm eligible

But I can only get their free service (which I dont give a fuck about I already get free fico scores). Or if i want money, i have to upload a whole bunch of documents. That seems wrong?

Looks like you only need basic info so long as you're not claiming further damage. That would be for the extra compensation for actual damages from the leak.

I assume there must be people who specialize only in one sex or the other, so definite no for those people being forced to take transpeople. If they take on all clients, it shouldn't matter other than maybe requiring them to inform of their genitalia so there aren't any surprises.

It might be a little petty, but this stuff shouldn't be on government property. These little wins are necessary to further the point.

It's always so funny seeing reactions from anti-cop people over probably 0.XX% of cops being truly horrible shitbags.

Y2K fearmongering

Far right extremism does not mean far left extremism is a good thing. It's possible to denounce both.

Her character isn't particularly memorable, so I'm not sure how well that will translate to a starring role. She has obvious star power, but they'll need to rework the character severely to make her interesting enough to hold a movie.

The act of slavery itself throughout the ages is for economic benefit first and foremost, but the size and scope of the Atlantic Slave Trade was definitely due to the perceived inferiority of other races. As a personal choice, many of the individual slave owners may not have ultimately cared about the race of their slaves, but they certainly viewed them as less than human for their race.

While racist rhetoric is bad, it should in itself never be illegal. Policing speech that does not lead to direct harm against another is a slippery slope where jokes become hate speech depending on who is disliked at the moment.

It's not like chubby chasers don't exist, so it's not unbelievable. That would be especially so if she's a fat attractive person because I'm sure they're more desirable.

Yes. Anyone who says no has no attachment whatsoever to money.

Assume my life is over due to the fact nobody is going to believe I'm me.

It's just a pointless change that nobody actually cares about. These things are always something 1% of the population actually wants changed, but we're catering to them out of some perceived benefit to mankind.

It doesn't really matter at the end of the day what they're called, but it's the capitulation that is the issue.

The state of other countries is saddening, but the US cannot support the entire third world and remain stable. We unfortunately don't live in a utopia, so there will always be suffering. Wealthy countries should try to help to the best of their ability, but they're not mandated to do it.

The past needs to be the past sometime. Outside of very specific circumstances, anyone who brings that up as an argument has no argument.

She was OK in the first movie, but definitely much better in this movie. Changing the character completely would have been dumb, so I think it's fine that they just made a new character with the nickname reference.

It's always weird when they attach a note about a bit role in a major series to the headline about a minor actor for the purpose of getting clicks.

It seems fine as one part of the lesson plan to initially help young kids better understand the numbers, but it doesn't really make sense as a constant method of teaching. Starting very simple and then working their way into a quicker method so they understand both seems like a fine idea. Do they eventually work their way out of it, or does it remain like that throughout the whole school system?