Lurker > SwayM

Some people are really butthurt Sony isn't just giving away their Spider-Man rights to Disney

Hogwarts is hilarious how hard it tried.

Boy oh boy i sure can't wait for the Rhino solo movie

Also rodent's revenge

Tifa didn't get fucked in the parliament for this

Let's bury this misogynistic thread in the dirt

Obvious without even reading the topic.

22 for a female is peak. She has the highest value a woman can have at that point. Males value a womans look so yeah, its peak.

22 is rather bad for a male. They have very low value. What can they provide that a 35 year old male cant? 35 year olds make way more money, offer better protection/secrurity that a 22 year old cant. Woman value security, so a 22 year old male is fucked. Males in their 20s should be building themselves up so by 35 they are high value.

Yes my three word post, my first post in this topic, was totally projecting, Sway. You got me!

Carry on with your whinefest, my friend.

Why you lying?

What are you talking about?

Yeah boiling it down to just a gender numbers question is pretty dishonest, that's just the tip of the iceberg. But yeah I don't think I'll ever be using a dating site now, lol

Saw this on my feed so I gave it a watch and basically answers why

https://youtu.be/x3lypVnJ0HM

Because there are more guys than girls on these apps.

You were told by women who struggled through this very thing. You dismissed our comments. Our experiences. There's nothing more to say here.

I believe they're calling it "the blip".

There are more miserable people in the topic. TC's pushing a faulty argument but at least he's standing by it. Others drop insults and BS and bail out the second they're proven wrong, no recognition.

Trumps campaign was actually a very good trailer. It set the tone perfectly and made it clear what you were getting into, but without giving away the juiciest plot points.

I'm going to add a wrinkle to this. In my experience, most guys don't fall into the two camps of "looking for casual dates" vs "looking for long term commitment." I think a large swath of guys are open to whatever, and then there are two types, both of which I have known:

1. Those who are desperate and who take either because whatever they can get is enough
2. Those who are experienced and can get dates, and are open to whatever happens. They are confident that they will settle down eventually with the right women but will just enjoy the journey until that happens. This was me BTW
So it is much more of a spectrum than two groups and most guys aren't at the two extremes.

Now my guess is that women are more likely to be searching for one or the other, or they at least state they are. It is not uncommon for women to say they are only looking for something serious and then push for sex on the first date with no plans for commitment. At least I have personally encountered this multiple times, and I hear similar stories from friends. And that includes female friends who state the same but then they tell me that they just say "fuck it" in the moment.

Just like the guy who swiped so much!

Like you put in an earpiece and I speak and you say what I'm saying? What if some hijinks occur, and our signal gets hijacked? Or what if some silly situation happens and you repeat EVERYTHING I say while I'm dealing with said silly situation????

They aren't and if you tell the guy who wants a wife that he's exactly the same as the guy who wants a casual hookup he is going to take offense to this.

They can but it's likely not going to work

You have this weird notion that a pickup artist is in the same boat as a person trying to find their true love.

A pick up artist in the context of the statistics who has sex every day of every week counts as someone who is single and is seeking casual dates. You think this is the same as someone seeking commitment. Lol

Going by this same logic ALL single people are part of the same pool as well as some who aren't.

Guys I already did the math why are we still arguing?