Lurker > Questionmarktarius

originialism is just about the dumbest concept ever

DuranOfForcena posted...

honestly i'm just trying to help people not make fools of themselves in public by calling things like a self-checkout lane a "robot"

Why would a self-checkout lane be called a robot? The lane doesn't perform any complex functions.

Alucard188 posted...

Darmik posted...

Alucard188 posted...

This is what happens when you try to be progressive; no matter what you do, somebody's going to be pissed off.

As much as people whine about Krem I think Dragon Age Inquisiton handled the same subject matter fine.

I had no problem with how they handled Krem. He wasn't defined by his sexuality, and you had to prod him to get the info out. I have no idea how they handled the transexual character in Andromeda, but if they're apologizing and issuing rewrites, they handled it pretty poorly.

They did the same mistake baldur's gate made where you talk to them and they go

"HELLO! I came from there where they called me Eric but that wasn't me so I became Jane and then i came here nice to meet you!" bullshit.

i like the idea of putting a tax on every robot that a business employs and that tax will be used to fund the worker(s) displaced by said robot.

Who it does make suffer is the content providers, since you've taken away their main source of income. If you are using an ad-blocker, then unless you're supporting the site some other way (you're providing content to the site, donating via Patreon, etc.), you don't really have a right to be using it anymore. I do think it's a bit selfish that people get on their high horse and say "I only block because the ads are invasive/really annoying/etc.", yet still feel they have a right to use a service they're now not even paying for.

The fact is if you give every man woman and child 20K a year that's 6.4 trillion dollars a year. That's just about double what government takes in in a year.

The real question is why would they be left alone alone with a loaded gun(tree of wisdom), and told not to touch it.

I believe that using an ad blocker is a violation of the content provider's rights since I'm using their platform while circumventing their mechanisms

More likely to just buy some desolate Eastern European country and locate them there. Owning my own country would make sense for tax purposes tbh.

Uh...isn't this every Mass Effect character?

"You're the protagonist? Let me tell you everything about both myself and my people."

I'm aware of that, it can't really be denied. Except it's irrelevant to the topic at hand.

FFS, you clean mold with bleach. Soap and water won't kill it.

6) Create a platform for uploading videos to rival YouTube. Never play ads on it ever because I don't need to monetize the damn thing since I'm rich AF already. Set it up on a subscriber pay wall similar to how Twitch works, so that ANYONE can view videos but you can subscribe to the channel. All revenue from subs goes to the channel creator. Set it up to stream as well. Put both YouTube and Twitch out of business when all their content creators realize they can make WAAAAAAAY more money on my site. This allows content creators to have the freedom to create content the way they want without sweating likes, subs, views, or whatever the hell YT has added to the most recent algorithm. Allows channels to run their OWN ads (but not site sponsored) so they can maintain their ad revenue. In general, make a site where creative people can freely express themselves for our viewing pleasure.

Nowhere does the word "number" appear in the definition, neither does "pencil and paper." It simply says game.

So are you saying the definition is wrong? Or are you saying that games commonly associated with the term "RPG" aren't actually doing any of those things in said definition?

Yes, it is. He was staying at the Hilton for something unrelated.

Questionmarktarius posted...

https://store.nintendo.com/ng3/browse/productDetailColorSizePicker.jsp?productId=prod150200

Damn you man. Where not here to help him just confuse him.

Zeus posted...

Zelda isn't an RPG.

A role-playing game (RPG and sometimes roleplaying game[1][2]) is a game in which players assume the roles of characters in a fictional setting. Players take responsibility for acting out these roles within a narrative, either through literal acting or through a process of structured decision-making or character development.[3] Actions taken within many games succeed or fail according to a formal system of rules and guidelines.[4]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game

In WHAT circumstance is it ok for Philly BLM to ban ANYONE based on the color of their skin?

Tower of Druaga

Questionmarktarius posted...

So.
Freud was right all along.

what did he say?

What kind of deranged sociopath question is this? Of course. Why the fuck is it about sjws that makes them blind to the differences between conservatism or in this case, simple equality and out right racism?

do they force you to put chip in your right hand or forehead only?


or can you do it on left hand?

Questionmarktarius posted...

Have you actually read a Stephen King book? That dude's one hell of a sicko.

To be fair, he doesn't remember writing most of his books. He was coked up out his mind for a lot of it.

known2FAIL posted...

Did some of you guys know that if you wear glasses as a black male you look far less threatening and get out of a lot more situations? I bet some of you think that's bullshit too but you have no clue but talk like you know.

Can confirm this is very true.

Yeap white people are typically ignorant to any racial context and it has to actively be pointed out to them for a long while before they see it on their own.

Soviet national anthem.

To be clear, my post is asking how Jim Crow laws are comparable to this BLM chapter's meeting rule

A Novel Idea posted...

How is Institutional and systemic racism in any way comparable to an activist group excluding white ppl?

So segregation is ok as long as it's not done on a large scale?

How is Institutional and systemic racism in any way comparable to an activist group excluding white ppl?

UnfairRepresent posted...

I'm not ignoring the context. The context is hilariously pathetic

One group planned a meeting with the intention of having a safe space for members of a certain group to exchange ideas is comparable to another group separating minorities out into shittier versions of their facilities because they see them as less human...in your eyes.

What's funny is you pretty much prove their point, since guys like you will come in and do nothing but get defensive, argue endlessly and then completely derail any productive conversation.

Pay off student loans.
Eat $99,999,990,000 worth of ice cream.

Certain private groups have meetings where certain people are not allowed. Is that segregation?

The alternative is being blocked entirely.

Questionmarktarius posted...

RchHomieQuanChi posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

But when white people discriminate no one tries to morally excuse it.

That's because white people don't typically do shit like this in the interest of protecting their own community

Sure they do.
http://www.boydsecurity.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/iStock_000003147050Small-resized.jpg

Yeah, that "whites only" sign in the front there is ridiculous

DifferentialEquation posted...

But when white people discriminate no one tries to morally excuse it.

That's because white people don't typically do shit like this in the interest of protecting their own community

Can somebody compile a list of video games in which you kill dogs? I want to try and track down the origin's of Jen's insanity.