Lurker > IceCreamOnStero

Yeah, it's amazing

Yeah, though I've always held that friendships founded on sexual attraction dont last

Diceheist posted...

People aren't understanding that going "but Trump is worse in this issue" is irrelevant since Trump doesn't need pro-Palestinian voters to win.

Shockingly, Palestine one issue voters who think "voting for a genocide enabler is unconsciable" (crazy thought amirite) apply that thought to Biden and Trump equally.

I plan on dying by the time I'm too old to do any fun stuff.

Gatekeeping is crucial for any community that is interested in upholding its values and focus.

Yes. I don't think actions necessarily have to define you, people can be multi-dimensional.

The data in this study is based on a percentile

Gamers aren't becoming less interested, there are simply more people considered "gamers", and the new additions happen to not be interested.

Other sports are irrelevant because being good at handegg has virtually no impact on being good at football.

As I've grown I've acclimated to a more "it is what is is" mindset. It doesn't erase all the inequality in life but with the little things in life I've accepted that you just have to make of it what you will even if its unfair or imperfect.

RPGS often have long introductions with little interactivity that put me off replaying them.

Because he's earnt the vote of the people he wants to vote for him. He does exactly what rightwingers with deplorable views want.

Vengeance29 posted...

I really don't understand the appeal for men. They add height, creating the perception that a woman- who otherwise would be shorter than you- is taller than you.

They add to a sense of "class" or "elegance". A nice dress and heels can be a really striking look.

I plan on dying before I get to the "too tired to do anything" stage. I see no use in saving money for the stage where I can't use it for anything.

-Lasagne
-Tuna
-Egg combined with something. Stuff like eggs in a sandwich
-Guacamole

None. I like my time and my money more.

The correct opinion is being confused ablut why anybody would give a fuck about Ubislop protagonists in the year 2024.

Hardcore Antitheists

What's the boundary for this

Just wait like a month and you'll be able to get the ultra deluxe mega edition feat. Knuckles on sale for like 30

Enclave posted...

Generic create-a-character characters don't tend to work in a narrative driven game where the protagonist is a fleshed out character. Not sure why some people seem to think every game should have character creation.

I completely agree with your point but calling Ubisoft protagonists "fleshed out characters" is extremely generous.

Oh no, your immersion is ruined by playing as a black guy in another piece of Ubislop. Surely if you were playing as an Asian guy, picking up another useless collectable and playing another trail mission would feel soooo real!

I don't know how they were disappointed or surprised given just about every every piece of coverage around it was a complete mess that literally no one liked or was looking forward to.

I'm still pretty young and I'm leaning to option 2. I think I could definitely live off of the first option but the second would be nice for some luxuries and a safety net regarding inflation.

Not really. There's no excuse to not be 60 minimum

I mean, big 2 comics has a lot going against it that makes it pretty inaccessible.

-To me there's always been a stigma of comics have dumb premises and dumb melodrama

-The "read chapter 1 bro" thing is a factor. Non-readers get the impression that they have to know a web of mythology and jump between 16 tie in books to read a Spidey run they're interested it. Its a wrong impression, but it is the impression.

-Frankly, anime and manga piracy are often synonymous with those communities, not really the case with comics.

FolkenRawr posted...

Is this sarcasm?

No. You let junkies use drugs in private residences and select establishments (bars, injection sites) and not in public, decriminalise it completely otherwise.

All you need for decriminalisation to work is to ban recreational drugs from public use. Its that simple.

Monolith1676 posted...

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

Something needs to be done about all three.

Something needs to be done about guns and cars because those are external deaths. Drug deaths are self-correcting.

leonkr41138 posted...

My apologies seriously meant to say twitter but it came out twitch now i cant edit or delete the topic

It's because "X" is a stupid name and the twitter branding is recognised by many and embedded in their perception of the platform.

Class consciousness is almost completely eroded. I doubt it

Because the writer wanted to speed up a long term change, without delving into the implications of a really long term skip.

1 year is enough to be an experienced adventurer in fiction logic, but is short enough that you aren't expecting the world's status quo to flip upside down. At 5+ years you'd have to start worrying about some major events, characters changing greatly themselves etc.

In choice based RPGs I often avoid it. Characters are mostly written to be likable in the first place, and you often lose content from being dickish or evil. A lot of these games respond to you being evil with punishments rather than any material rewards. That makes sense in universe, but gives me little reason to deviate from being a goody two shoes.

MTRodaba2468 posted...

This. Ever since Bethesda took over, it's been mainstream.

No, in general.

Rule of thumb, if it's a AAA game franchise, it's mainstream. It doesn't have to be on the level of recognizability of Mario or Sonic to be mainstream.

This really isn't true. Gaming has grown alot but there's still a difference between "mainstream in gaming" and "mainstream mainstream"

The people who don't want to fund Ukraine don't want to help homeless people either.

VeggetaX posted...

A lot of people don't. They think they're deserving of the best and then wonder why they're single and/or lonely.

You won't hear much people say "I'm single because my standards are too high".

I don't see those people wondering why they're single.

I don't see why anyone should settle just because their expectations are "unrealistic". There's nothing wrong with setting standards high as long as you're aware of what that entails.

If Pokemon Black counts I'd say a huge amount of franchises apply for this.

I'm honestly struggling to think of any that haven't.

Lonestar2000 posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/b/b6478b18.jpg

How much has the total aid to Ukraine been? Because I feel like a lot of this stuff would be really helpful for the country actually fighting off an invader.

bladegash posted...

I just got one that was a "find out if you are gay, lesbian or bisexual with this gay test"

And I thought either we weren't adult enough for that kind of content or gamefaqs.gamespot.fuckfandom.com didn't want to engage in that kind of content.

Exactly, its all clickbait garbage. As if they care about the sanctity of their brand being next to political posts on gamefacks.com

I just do my taxes properly and then it's automatically taken out of my paycheck

ceceame

As if advertisers care ablut this place. Aren't the ads just generic shit anyway?

Not really, people often cheer regimes they hate being struck. You see a similar thing with Russia

Thoughts and prayers and the bare minimum of aid.

So pretty much what they've done for Gaza while Israel indiscriminately bombs it.

No, and I'm fine with that.

Samurontai posted...

Kind of obvious that those become legitimate targets,

Civillian targets are not legitamate targets.

also why the assumption that Israel would expect there to still be civilians there after the warnings to leave?

Probably because of all the other times where they gave their "warnings" (those warnings are complete bullshit), they somehow, magically happened to still kill civillians.

Are you suggesting that Israel see that their strikes kill civillians and then put zero consideration into avoiding that for future strikes?

Samurontai posted...

Using an example that personal is disingenuous as fuck, just saying. Also the circumstances are completely different. I don't think I've ever seen a worse analogy before in my life. You are comparing a scenario in which I actively know that someone is holding my mom hostage, to an active war zone in which Hamas prevents civilians from leaving after Israel warns them to.

You're so close to getting it.

Yeah, Israel don't see it as comparable to that situation, because they don't care about civillian casualties, because they don't see Palestinians as people.

Samurontai posted...

I know right? It's almost like an extremist group is using them as human shields and preventing them from leaving or something. Crazy thought that a terrorist group would do terrorist things.

Why is Israel striking targets they know have human shields placed at them?