As my posts on 261 and here can attest, I am staunchly pro choice. But: I am not sure it can be classified as a logical argument, but I think it is a compelling one: it is impossible, truly, to know when the spark of life begins for a human. I dont think that a clump of cells is truly alive, but I think it is tricky business to make a determination like that once a pregnancy is in motion. If it were my body, or someone asked me for advice, I dont think I could choose abortion. I would be too worried about the possibility of ending a life that has already begun in some way.
I am pro choice because that is not my decision to make. A woman, along with whatever support she chooses, gets to decide what to do with her body. Decisions about whether to bring a life into the world and all the consequences either way of that decision are hers to determine. Neither I, or the government, or anyone has any business imposing their view of this on her. I am personally uncomfortable with abortion, but my view is irrelevant. The person carrying the child is the only one to make this call about their destiny. Period.
It does not help the pro life argument that much of it is also completely dishonest. Many are obviously using abortion bans as a way to control women, and many stop caring about abortion as soon as the baby is born and its use as a wedge issue is exhausted. Pro Life arguments would be a lot more compelling if the same people spewing them where not also constantly trying to cut Medicaid and school lunches for children.
I hate abortion, but government needs to stay out of the decisions that shape our destinies. Government needs to give us a basic environment to thrive and then get out of our way instead of trying to impose on the decisions that shape our lives. Women must be allowed to do what is right for them, their bodies, their lives.
An opinion does not turn into a fact simply because the person holding it feels strongly about it.