Dunno if it's been posted yet butDidn't there used to be a war in this movie?
"Frankly, my dear... I LOVE YOU! LET'S REMARRY."
Ok so this irritates me. My grandad gor divorced by my grandmother and partially because he didn't keep in contact while he was overseas during Vietnam. Decades later they had to permanently hospitalized my great grandmother and when cleaning out her house they found a breif case full of letters from my grandad to my grandmother.You sure this wasn't The Notebook?
Great grandmother was intercepting them and hiding them. My grandmother dropped to the floor crying her then current husband snatched the brief case and disposed of it. He had wrote her a letter everyday he was in Vietnam.
If you die and you're wrong, then the likely scenario is that everybody else is wrong too and whatever you believed on Earth won't have an impact on the afterlife.What god hates religious people?
Neither? Dude is an all star. Retired from Hollywood to take care of his dying wife and raise his children. I'm pretty sure he is still getting offers as well. There were rumors he was considering a part in a Disney project now that his kids are all grown, but checking his imdb it doesn't list any upcoming projects so he might have turned it down.It's for Shrunk. Though project might be scrapped. Maybe he can come back for a Ghost Buster movie.
Edit: oh it was just his kids. His wife had already died at that point. But he did sign on to the Disney project it just hasn't started yet. Considering it was signed in 2020 it was probably covid related.
Technically, it can do both. Because generative AI doesn't necessarily recognize elements, it can figures from a piece of artwork and put them as-is into another artwork (ie, no change to the figure itself).So it's not necessarily breaking any laws?
In theory, it's creating new composition. In some cases, that involves recreating existing material and in other cases it might reuse it. However, there's so much content out there that it's tough to determine what belonged to what, outside of famous works.
I dont think its possible. Theres no way to really know if a machine that seems sentient truly is sentient, or is just really good at appearing to be. But thats a philosophical problem more than a technological one. The same issue applies to humans; you cant really know anything else is conscious other than yourself.So we could be giving human rights to a glorified chatbot in the futureIs is solipsistic in here or is it just me?
Ive been accused of having won the lottery before. I have not won the lottery.That's what a lottery winner would say. You lottery winner. You damn lottery winner.
some of it can. i will never support it over a real artist, though.What if an artist trains an AI using only their own work to make something?
hands still get fucked up a lot too.