Nobody:BTW thanks for the billion dollars we made in cheap DVD videos about you.
Disney: Let's ban this iconic character just in case...
Seems like they really had to stretch to turn this into a story worth reporting. Disney didn't even make a statementThis. They're creating outrage bait based purely on speculation. Tinkerbell is not currently on the meet and greet rotation at Disney World in Florida, but is still on the rotation at Disneyland in California. The characters available for meet and greet just change periodically
"But meet and greets with the character are still available at Disneyland in Anaheim, California, suggesting the Stories Matter findings may not have played a factor in the decision to end the characters meet and greets at Walt Disney World."
Seems like a bunch of made up outrage over nothing.
As for Peter Pan...
"The Stories Matter team also flagged Peter Pan for its negative portrayal of Native people and the use of redskins in the film."
Yeah that's fair, not sure why TC has a problem with it.
aaaaah the modern/global audience catering strikes again.It's funny because at this point it can easily also just be trying to be safe under Desantis laws.
aaaaah the modern/global audience catering strikes again.Couldn't wait to be suckered by a story so insubstantial that even the writer is unsure if it has any basis.
Tinkerbell and Periwinkle : 410 - 52
tankerbell's
Honestly Tinkerbell driving a tank around the park sounds badass.Peter Pan dun goofed
and the creeper that was after Esmerelda,
Couldn't wait to be suckered by a story so insubstantial that even the writer is unsure if it has any basis.I can't be angry at something so insignificant. Global/modern audiences are the target these days so Tink has to go. Pan's NA scenes I'm surprised they haven't relegated that to the abyss yet. Most companies don't go the Looney Tunes route and just put a disclaimer before things. They rather just remove it completely cause of shame. *remembers the change to "Savages" in Pocahontas*
Enjoy being angry at nothing.
I can't be angry at something so insignificant. Global/modern audiences are the target these days so Tink has to go. Pan's NA scenes I'm surprised they haven't relegated that to the abyss yet. Most companies don't go the Looney Tunes route and just put a disclaimer before things. They rather just remove it completely cause of shame. *remembers the change to "Savages" in Pocahontas*
Probably cant hire enough people that fit the requirements for the face character in Orlando. The pay is pretty shit and you have to act the whole time you are out.How does Disney get away with this? This is clearly discrimination??
Also all characters have height requirements.
* Elsa, Anna, Rapunzel, Cinderella, Aurora, Belle, Ariel, Snow White, and Jasmine: 53 - 57
* Mulan: 52 - 56
* Tiana and Pocahontas: 55 - 58
* Merida and Jane: 54 - 56
* Tinkerbell and Periwinkle : 410 - 52
* Rosetta, Silvermist, Iridessa, and Fawn: 52 - 55
* Vidia, Flora, Fauna, Merryweather, and (Cinderellas) Fairy Godmother: 54 - 56
* Mary Poppins: 55 - 58"
* Alice and Wendy: 410 - 54
* Esmeralda: 57 - 510
* Meg: 56 - 58
* All female villains: 56 - 510
How does Disney get away with this? This is clearly discrimination??
Then again, they were probably holding the pen when writing those bills so that's probably why
height isn't a protected classParaplegic? Dwarfism?
Paraplegic? Dwarfism?Considered a protected class, but under ADA rather than Title VII terminology.
Paraplegic? Dwarfism?
but the dwarfism thing might fall under ADA protections?Your typical job protection in America is mostly baked into Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and specifically prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including orientation and gender identity as of 2019), or national origin.