Who cares?Found a member of the Tails Krew
Yes and I used to troll with chud stuff which I acknowledged was toxic shit and its been years since. If anyone still wants to make me out to be a vile person because of what I had done years ago and apologized for then thats on them I guessIt's really funny that you made this post right after I tagged you for the dumbfuckery you said in the EA topic.
Yes and I used to troll with chud stuff which I acknowledged was toxic shit and its been years since. If anyone still wants to make me out to be a vile person because of what I had done years ago and apologized for then thats on them I guessI have never seen you before today, but today alone I have seen you go into multiple topics, drop a flagrantly-contrarian post defending what everyone else was upset about, and dip.
Quick Answers: Feedback from communities using the tool indicates that the AI's tone does not align with the encyclopedic voice of the wiki. Over the past few weeks, we have worked on adjusting the AI's tone to be more straightforward and in line with the encyclopedic style. We believe these improvements will better match the wikis using the tool, and we are prepared to expand the Quick Answers tool to more communities. Moving forward, we will continue to reach out to communities where Quick Answers will be introduced, providing information about the tool and addressing any questions they may have.
Yes and I used to troll with chud stuff which I acknowledged was toxic shit and its been years since. If anyone still wants to make me out to be a vile person because of what I had done years ago and apologized for then thats on them I guesshttps://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80765035/980301802
It's really funny that you made this post right after I tagged you for the dumbfuckery you said in the EA topic.
EA stuff is equivalent to chud stuff now? Whats the equivalence between having dumb video game opinions and having chud opinions? The latter is vile the former is just dumb at worst, I just dont see the comparison unless one is purposely trying to find flimsy connection to intentionally characterize a person as being vile. Quite a few CE users partake in this pastime of false equivalence to get good digs in
EA stuff is equivalent to chud stuff now? Whats the equivalence between having dumb video game opinions and having chud opinions? The latter is vile the former is just dumb at worst, I just dont see the comparison unless one is purposely trying to find flimsy connection to intentionally characterize a person as being vile. Quite a few CE users partake in this pastime of false equivalence to get good digs inNo, but it solidifies you clear pattern of posting fake "unpopular opinions" to try to piss people off.
EA stuff is equivalent to chud stuff now? Whats the equivalence between having dumb video game opinions and having chud opinions? The latter is vile the former is just dumb at worst, I just dont see the comparison unless one is purposely trying to find flimsy connection to intentionally characterize a person as being vile. Quite a few CE users partake in this pastime of false equivalence to get good digs inActively antagonizing in ways that are obviously either not your belief or are only your belief sheerly because they are crappy is what I would call chud behavior, yes. The act of it being about EA is irrelevant. It could be like if someone went into a "the politics of Yakuza" topic just to say that both sides have a valid point: it's all about having a flagrantly bad take, not the material that spawned it.
Have you considered having good opinions instead of dumb ones?
maybe Im just a dumb person, thats not a crime. I just dont see the false equivalence between posting chud shit and dumb video game opinions, its just reeks of someone using flimsy connections to characterize me as a vile person, which is vicious on its own right mind you
Boy this has real Musk unbanning right-wing nutjobs on twitter energy to it.
Actively antagonizing in ways that are obviously either not your belief or are only your belief sheerly because they are crappy is what I would call chud behavior, yes. The act of it being about EA is irrelevant. It could be like if someone went into a "the politics of Yakuza" topic just to say that both sides have a valid point: it's all about having a flagrantly bad take, not the material that spawned it.
maybe Im just a dumb person, thats not a crime. I just dont see the false equivalence between posting chud shit and dumb video game opinions, its just reeks of someone using flimsy connections to characterize me as a vile person, which is vicious on its own right mind you
if having dumb takes on a video game makes me a chud in your eyes then you do you buddyMy professional recommendation is to stop having dumb takes
EA stuff is equivalent to chud stuff now? Whats the equivalence between having dumb video game opinions and having chud opinions? The latter is vile the former is just dumb at worst, I just dont see the comparison unless one is purposely trying to find flimsy connection to intentionally characterize a person as being vile. Quite a few CE users partake in this pastime of false equivalence to get good digs inI didn't say that they're equivalent. The point was pretty clear, they figured it out no problem.
I mean at the end of the day you guys are free to think what you want, if you think Im a vile person for making dumb takes feel free do drive bys at me every post I make. Im still gonna have dumb takes though on stuff that doesnt matter, Im just not a smart person, if thats my crime then so be it, obviously you guys can rejoice Ill be banned soon since Im such a vile and horrible user.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/3/3ef41b3b.jpg
Anyway, now that that weird chud digression is over, back to the topic at hand.
Before DToast locks it
As long as no one tags DToast this topic will remain open unless a mod tries to do Toast's job with damage control lol.
DToast isn't a community manager, he's an administrator.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/acc5b8ea.jpg
So let me see if I've got this straight.Huge. Yikes.
* They made CE private to, among other reasons, make users feel safe.
* The site admin then gave a brand new account access to CE despite it being private.
* The new account immediately promoted anti-vaxx propaganda (i.e. unsafe disinformation).
Is that right?
It was an anti-vax topic from a brand new account that the admin personally invited in.Was it the one that had a level of 2?
wait THATS the post he blamed CE for doxxing??? He literally posted his name and location of his own accordAnd the post is still up.
wait THATS the post he blamed CE for doxxing??? He literally posted his name and location of his own accordI think a few people did do the thing where they go too far and pull up and post someones social media in a setting where its not really appropriate. I dont think anyone posted anything that was not already publicly available, but it definitely can be borderline when people start posting stuff like that.
I think a few people did do the thing where they go too far and pull up and post someones social media in a setting where its not really appropriate. I dont think anyone posted anything that was not already publicly available, but it definitely can be borderline when people start posting stuff like that.Im not saying posting peoples social media is okay, but posting your real name and location on an anonymous message board while announcing youre in charge now is literally doxxing yourself, and a ridiculously awful idea
Can we like, contact Fandom's higher-ups about this? This is a blatant abuse of power on DToast's part. On top of spending 2 weeks punishing people for rules that were not officially implemented. I sincerely think he deserves to lose his job.They likely won't give a shit.
Can we like, contact Fandom's higher-ups about this? This is a blatant abuse of power on DToast's part. On top of spending 2 weeks punishing people for rules that were not officially implemented. I sincerely think he deserves to lose his job.
I tried to tell you he just does whatever tails & company suggests but no one believed meThat is wack.
They wouldn't even let my Crimsoness account back in lol
DToast went to the trouble of privatizing this board. That might not sound that hard but I imagine when youre modifying code as old as this site no change is trivial. So they went to all that trouble, only to let new users in? I dont buy that storyIt's no trouble at all. The code is already there. They can freely change boards from social to community. So changing it to Community and making himself the owner is in fact trivial.
Wait, so as I'm reading more of this... so they implement a policy where they say ban evasion won't be allowed anymore and then DToast allows someone to ban evade coming back to CE because they... pinky promised they weren't a shit tier user? Fucking LOL. What a complete lack of social internet awareness.
I think he will with all the negativity he's brought on him and how poorly he's handled the changes and interacting with the community. Fandom is a business at the end of the day and I at least think they'll want someone to represent the site in a positive light who can handle the pressure when it comes. Dtoast can't.