A company whose leadership believes nothing is more important than stock prices would have a very strong motivation to kill a guy who would likely tank stock prices if he remained alive.
And such a leadership wouldnt consider how suspicious it looks. Absolutely destroying the companys future for near term stock gains shows an inability to care about consequences.
The whole it definitely had to be murder falls apart if you actually think about it.Trolling. Marked.
Good thing conspiracy theorists never think!
Tell that to Putins opposition, or fuck go far back as Lincoln or Kennedy, or King who are probably the most famous ones.Last I checked, Boeing isnt in charge of their own secret police to cover up everything.
Never flying Boeing againCant really do that my man. Many flights you may take will only have Boeings
But why does Boeing have cultists supporting them? And why does it seem possible some users here might sorta be into that?So now youre concerned with whether things make sense.
Doesn't make sense.
Cant really do that my man. Many flights you may take will only have Boeings
I just flew on one last night
But why does Boeing have cultists supporting them? And why does it seem possible some users here might sorta be into that?
Doesn't make sense.
No clue. Is Boeing one of those companies conservatives seem to love? I can see anyone with pull in the military having people play defense for them.
Not that this is necessarily so.
But why does Boeing have cultists supporting them? And why does it seem possible some users here might sorta be into that?Because they think trickle down is a thing and the billion-dollar corporation can't do anything wrong.
Doesn't make sense.
Family and Friends exist.
All of them report the same.
The article even said:
But you will deny this of course because it does not fit your bias. Maybe lay aside bias seek objective information?
Weird reaction? I asked why you keep posting about it. It is like you are trying to convince yourself. Not sure why though. You don't work at Boeing do you?
And giving a timeline isn't saying anything. If you see the timeline and it makes you think he was murdered, then you need to consider why that is.
----------
Timeline:
1. People die on Boeing planes.
2. Boeing just gets a slap on the wrist.
3. Justice Department is like "huh. maybe there is something more here."
4. John Barnett begins HIGHLY detailing exactly what was happening at Boeing and discussing issues his team documented like oxygen masks not working
5. Justice Department calls him to testify.
6. John Barnett is dead.
Last I checked, Boeing isnt in charge of their own secret police to cover up everything.Yet that doesnt change my point. On top of that with this situation it comes off less conspiracy and more HIGHLY suspicious.
As for the others, yes, those were assassinations, WITH WITNESSES, AND EVIDENCE, AND A CULPRIT THAT WAS APPREHENDED.
Conspiracy theories are none of those.
because family and friends are never in denial?
The whole it definitely had to be murder falls apart if you actually think about it.You didnt actually think about anything regarding this article.
Good thing conspiracy theorists never think!
Like I said you are too biased to look at objective reality.Despite what Lionel Hutz would tell you, hearsay and conjecture are not "kinds of evidence."
All his family and friends said he was of stable mind.
But you, who never met the guy say he was not. Who to believe?
Despite what Lionel Hutz would tell you, hearsay and conjecture are not "kinds of evidence."
And short of an actual investigation that is really all you have to go on.
Not sure what your point is. I am not an investigator putting Boeing in jail.Nor are you the judge trying the case, yet you've laid down a guilty verdict.
Nor are you the judge trying the case, yet you've laid down a guilty verdict.
Nor are you the judge trying the case, yet you've laid down a guilty verdict.
Verdict - NounMetaphorically.
a decision on a disputed issue in a civil or criminal case or an inquest.
"the jury returned a verdict of not guilty."
This topic isn't a civil or criminal case so... what verdict?
Metaphorically.
Yea there are conspiracies that are no longer conspiracies because they were proven true.Conspiracy isn't a word that means unproven or crazy idea.
There's no metaphor. TC just believes Bowing is guilty. Their opinion isn't a factor in an actual court of law, which is probably why no one claimed it does.I'm here because I hate conspiracy theories. They're usually very uniformed and (this is a bit of a selfish reason) they tend to eventually lead down a rabbit hole that ends in Anti-Semitism.
Not sure what you're even doing here.
I'm here because I hate conspiracy theories. They're usually very uniformed and (this is a bit of a selfish reason) they tend to eventually lead down a rabbit hole that ends in Anti-Semitism.
I'm here because I hate conspiracy theories. They're usually very uniformed and (this is a bit of a selfish reason) they tend to eventually lead down a rabbit hole that ends in Anti-Semitism.
you are saying a very likely scenario of Boeing having this guy killed will lead to Anti-Semitism?It's more likely than you think!
It's more likely than you think!
Boeing probably killed him.I'm gonna say, the fact that that I'm skeptical that they actually had him literally assassinated does not mean that I don't think that they are 100% responsible for his death. They totally are. Don't need for it to have actually been a murder for that to be true.
Even aside from that, all the shit in this article are damning for the ruthless disregard for safety... actually that doesn't do it justice, they actively punished people for trying to find safety issues because they were "hurting our stock value".
Boeing needs to be broken apart by the government and the CEO needs to be sent to jail. Not white collar jail. Real, blue collar jail. He's a mass murderer, only thing "uncertain" is if you need to tack a +1 to the number of lives from the two crashes or not.
How does thinking Boeing had a whistleblower killed lead to anti-semitism. Please explain. This will be interesting.Because people who are credulous enough to believe one conspiracy theory often wind up believing more and more of them. Hence the rabbit hole.
Boeing probably killed him.Not just him, but the board of directors took, as well as the C-suite as a whole. They're all responsible.
Even aside from that, all the shit in this article are damning for the ruthless disregard for safety... actually that doesn't do it justice, they actively punished people for trying to find safety issues because they were "hurting our stock value".
Boeing needs to be broken apart by the government and the CEO needs to be sent to jail. Not white collar jail. Real, blue collar jail. He's a mass murderer, only thing "uncertain" is if you need to tack a +1 to the number of lives from the two crashes or not.
Like I said you are too biased to look at objective reality.
All his family and friends said he was of stable mind.
But you, who never met the guy say he was not. Who to believe?
quote where i said that? i said it is suspicious and should be investigated, not 100% buying that it is a murder with zero evidence.^^^^THIS^^^^
They wrecked a lot of people's lives in ways I can't discuss.
quote where i said that?
andel posted... it's a suspicious death and should be investigated as such but suicide is usually a highly irrational action and people that commit suicide are generally not in a normal state of mind
Which the CEO might be!
quote where i said that?
undefined posted... it's a suspicious death and should be investigated as such but suicide is usually a highly irrational action and people that commit suicide are generally not in a normal state of mind