It'll probably be PS4 Pro strength at best tbh
It'll be 600 and they're gonna go back a gen in power
Trust me my uncle told me and he works for Nintendo
disregarding you're asking for a portable brick that has 2 hours battery life, nintendo have never prioritised matching other consoles hardware specs. they march to the beat of their own drum and it works for them. if you want a portable ps5, then get a ps5 and use remote play.
Honestly, graphics shouldnt really matter anymore. Mario Odyssey, Mario Kart, they all look great.rebirth doesn't even look good outside cutscenes imo
Sure, FF7Rebirth has nice effects and lighting, but not every game needs to be that way.
Just as long as it doesnt look as gross as Pokemon or Xenoblade 2/3
Best I can do is PS4 Pro levelBarely. The dlss will do a lot of heavy lifting.
Has Nintendo ever led the pack in performance/graphics?
Besides with today's battery tech you'd get like 2 hours out of a AAA title just like the Deck's competitors that have higher specs.
Idk why Nintendo is so afraid of making good hardware nowadays.
The Gamecube was 20 years ago.
I mean there's already the steamdeck for one thing. If dorks want a high powered portable device, there you go. That's the answer.
Idk why Nintendo is so afraid of making good hardware nowadays.I assume you mean "high-end performance" hardware. And that's because the last time they did, the GCN sold so poorly they had to stop manufacturing it for a while and drop the price to $99. They figured out from the PS2, which only sold like crazy because it was an early, cheap DVD player, that high-end hardware doesn't move consoles, it's what the hardware can do for you. That, and compared to Sony and MS, Nintendo doesn't sell their consoles at a loss. Although I'm not sure about the Switch and whatnot.
Has Nintendo ever led the pack in performance/graphics?Gamecube. I think the under-the-hood XBox was technically better, but you wouldn't know it. RE4 and the Metroid Primes were by and far the peak performances games from that gen, with Halo somewhere in their.
Has Nintendo ever led the pack in performance/graphics?
Has Nintendo ever led the pack in performance/graphics?They did for about 2 months in 2001. Until the Xbox launched.
PS4 Pro power level but the games will still look like 2012.Honestly, if it results in stable framerates I wouldn't care
They did for about 2 months in 2001. Until the Xbox launched.You can argue GC had better performance to price.
The next Nintendo console should be a normal freaking console that has power close enough to PS5 that it can get 3rd party games.Theres barely a market for two consoles that do the exact same thing, why would we need another one?
Switch can be the lower powered handheld console since they ended the 3DS.
Their own first party games can be released to both consoles for the most part since they aren't that demanding graphically or maybe have better graphics on the new console but playable on either.
But it's Nintendo, they'll probably just reinvent the wheel for no good reason, or make a literal Switch 2 that's the same as Switch 1 but marginally more powerful. -_-
Idk why Nintendo is so afraid of making good hardware nowadays.GameCube didn't sell as much as they wanted, but the Wii sold super well. They figured out they didn't need to care about graphical power since that's not what sells for them.
The Gamecube was 20 years ago.
GameCube didn't sell as much as they wanted, but the Wii sold super well. They figured out they didn't need to care about graphical power since that's not what sells for them.