hating freedom of speechStrange. Only one party is banning books.
Imagine hating freedom of speech and thinking you're the good guys.Yeah, the GOP needs to stop banning books. Every group in history that has ever banned books and shut down libraries has been downright evil.
Read a history book.
knowledge and wisdom has standardsBut if they don't also teach that 2+2=5 then how can we be sure that education is balanced and fair?/s
Yeah, the GOP needs to stop banning books. Every group in history that has ever banned books and shut down libraries has been downright evil.Im convinced that guy is trolling. No one is really that imbecilic. Right?
Im convinced that guy is trolling. No one is really that imbecilic. Right?Is there really a difference?
Im convinced that guy is trolling. No one is really that imbecilic. Right?Dill is a weird case, certainly.
Imagine hating freedom of speech and thinking you're the good guys.Freedom of speech is saying what I want knowing the government will not come after me for it (exceptions apply of course).
Read a history book.
Imagine hating freedom of speech and thinking you're the good guys.You're still here, RealDill?
Read a history book.
This is how it used to be. People used to be able to argue in good faith and that's been lostLike you "arguing in good faith" in that other topic about how racism is the minorities' fault?
Like you "arguing in good faith" in that other topic about how racism is the minorities' fault?I'm willing to hear opposing viewpoints
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/79c1ba8a.jpg
Like you "arguing in good faith" in that other topic about how racism is the minorities' fault?Yes.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/79c1ba8a.jpg
This is how it used to be. People used to be able to argue in good faith and that's been lostIs that what you believe school should be? Every idiotic baseless opinion being debated in "good faith"?
This is how it used to be. People used to be able to argue in good faith and that's been lost
This is how it used to be. People used to be able to argue in good faith and that's been lostConservatives dont argue in good faith. Theyd literally rather make up delusional fantasies than argue in good faith.
I'm willing to hear opposing viewpointsNo one is willing to hear yours. Who deluded you into thinking your viewpoint matters?
Every angle of a topic should be taught without biasOh, yes, save them from the "bias" of calling the likes of slavery and the holocaust horrible actions.
Every angle of a topic should be taught without bias so students can learn and decide for themselves how they want to interpret the information.
That's an ideal world though and I'm not sure if it works in our reality as it stands.
How do we know if our understanding of animal physiology is true if we don't understand how the mothman operates?"Now, we are here to study the circulatory system of horses. Before we can do that, however, we must ask a question. Mothman: does he fuck ?"
"Now, we are here to study the circulatory system of horses. Before we can do that, however, we must ask a question. Mothman: does he fuck ?"
*nervous whispers*
nah, that's just ridiculous.So you just chose some wild out there fringe belief to try to debate me with. Alright then. You could teach that the belief exists but use qualifiers such as how it's debunked or spread by racists. That goes into every angle, you can teach some people about dumbass belief systems and calling them stupid is not biased in my view.
for instance, "slavery actually benefitted black people because it taught them skills" unequivocally, categorically, absolutely ISN'T an angle that should be taught to ANYONE, anywhere, at any point, for ANY reason.
Every angle of a topic should be taught without bias so students can learn and decide for themselves how they want to interpret the information.Conservative views should be treated with extreme prejudice, and the point of education is to remove as many faults of the mind as possible which are required to embrace conservatism.
So you just chose some wild out there fringe belief to try to debate me with. Alright then. You could teach that the belief exists but use qualifiers such as how it's debunked or spread by racists. That goes into every angle, you can teach some people about dumbass belief systems and calling them stupid is not biased in my view.What angles do you actually mean?
You left out the second part of what I posted too in which I say I don't think it's viable and that what I said would only really work in an ideal world. So in a sense we agree.
So you just chose some wild out there fringe belief to try to debate me with. Alright then. You could teach that the belief exists but use qualifiers such as how it's debunked or spread by racists. That goes into every angle, you can teach some people about dumbass belief systems and calling them stupid is not biased in my view.How is calling a certain belief stupid not biased? Thats inserting what you believe about something into the no bias lecture, and thus should not be allowed according to you.
You left out the second part of what I posted too in which I say I don't think it's viable and that what I said would only really work in an ideal world. So in a sense we agree.
What angles do you actually mean?Mostly I just mean that if you teach a class you should teach the subject thoroughly.
So you just chose some wild out there fringe belief to try to debate me with. Alright then.
"The American public and Hoosiers as well are losing faith and trust in higher education," Deery said. "One of the strong reasons for that is, frankly, higher education hasn't done a great job of making every viewpoint feel welcome."Yeah, frankly, certain viewpoints shouldn't feel welcome, and should be treated as what they are.
So you just chose some wild out there fringe belief to try to debate me with.
Mostly I just mean that if you teach a class you should teach the subject thoroughly.Ah yes, the extreme examples of the lost cause narrative and the idea that slavery actually benefited slaves in some manner.
It's not really that wild of an idea I think.
CE jumping to extreme examples is taking what I mean way too far but that's par for the course.
Mostly I just mean that if you teach a class you should teach the subject thoroughly.But that's beside the point of the topic.
But that's beside the point of the topic.
It's about "both side'sing" education, not the density of the lesson plans themselves.
So if you start talking about "exploring every angle of a topic without bias" in a topic discussing how MAGAts want to deny slavery happened, it's not exactly likely that people will think you meant "teach the subject thoroughly" instead of thinking you're talking about the actual subject matter.
CE jumping to extreme examplesThe "extreme examples" are precisely what the bill is for
said the new law would help conservative students feel more comfortable expressing their opinions on campus.Not every viewpoint is worthwhile or needs to be welcomed. But the bill is expressly to allow those viewpoints.
"The American public and Hoosiers as well are losing faith and trust in higher education," Deery said. "One of the strong reasons for that is, frankly, higher education hasn't done a great job of making every viewpoint feel welcome."
What do you think is being referenced when it talks "being more accepting of conversative students" by diversifying the viewpoints of subjects taught in college?
Do you honestly think in the reality where conservatives who are anti-information, anti-vax, anti-education, anti-rights, etc. are talking teaching multiple ways to solve a single math problem? Do you think they are talking about something else?
Imagine having such shit opinions that you need to create laws to force otherwise sane-minded intellectuals to give them credenceImagine being stuck in an echo chamber so long you can't even entertain differing opinions
Lol but Fullmetal alchemist makes me want to believe that alchemy can be real some day...The things Elric does may be possible someday but it won't be called alchemy.
Imagine being stuck in an echo chamber so long you can't even entertain differing opinions
MATH PROFESSOR: "The square root of 64 is 8"You just made a joke conservatives make about liberals.
CONSERVATIVE STUDENT: "I feel like it's 7"
MATH PROFESSOR: "That is incorrect"
CONSERVATIVE STUDENT: "WHY ARE YOU OPPRESSING MY VIEWPOINT????"
*Professor is fired the next day*
The things Elric does may be possible someday but it won't be called alchemy.And as a concept, in a lot of ways alchemy was just proto chemistry until we got more advanced.