https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hearings-ny-georgia/index.htmlHaha. I'm thinking of the scene in Billy Madison. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
We strenuously object to what is happening in this courtroom, attorney Todd Blanche said after the lawyers had finished dealing with all of the motions before Judge Juan Merchan ahead of the trial.
But Merchan had already rejected Blanches attempts to push back the March 25 date for the start of the trial, and he wasnt interested in continuing the conversation.
"Whats your legal argument?" Merchan asked.
"That is my legal argument," Blanche responded.
"Thats not a legal argument," Merchan said, telling the lawyers he'd see everyone March 25 and adjourning the hearing.
lol
The fact that President Trump is going to now spend the next two months working on this trial instead of out in the campaign trail running for president is something that should not happen in this countryYes, it should and if that upsets Trump or this chucklefuck lawyer then maybe they shouldn't have done things that would require them to be in court.
Haha. I'm thinking of the scene in Billy Madison. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hearings-ny-georgia/index.html
We strenuously object to what is happening in this courtroom, attorney Todd Blanche said after the lawyers had finished dealing with all of the motions before Judge Juan Merchan ahead of the trial.
But Merchan had already rejected Blanches attempts to push back the March 25 date for the start of the trial, and he wasnt interested in continuing the conversation.
"Whats your legal argument?" Merchan asked.
"That is my legal argument," Blanche responded.
"Thats not a legal argument," Merchan said, telling the lawyers he'd see everyone March 25 and adjourning the hearing.
lol
We strenuously object to what is happening in this courtroom, attorney Todd Blanche said after the lawyers had finished dealing with all of the motions before Judge Juan Merchan ahead of the trial.Oh. Well, if they strenuously object, then the judge should take some time to reconsider.
Wait. Strenuously object? lmao
This was thought to be the toughest of the three main cases (GA, FLDocumrnts, NY hush money)
But Merchan had already rejected Blanches attempts to push back the March 25 date for the start of the trial, and he wasnt interested in continuing the conversation.
"Whats your legal argument?" Merchan asked.
"That is my legal argument," Blanche responded.
"Thats not a legal argument," Merchan said, telling the lawyers he'd see everyone March 25 and adjourning the hearing.
i don't get it. what's the context?In the film A Few Good Men, Demi Moore's character uses the phrase in an objection, and then it's pointed out that it's a meaningless phrase that only serves to make them look bad to the court. The purpose is to highlight how inexperienced she is as a trial lawyer, which makes it completely hilarious that these Trump lawyers are using it now.
The evidentiary hearing in Georgia is actually pretty interesting. It appears that one of Willis friend talked about her relationship, only for it to come out that Willis fired her and it ended her relationship with Willis
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/1757899702370980110
In the film A Few Good Men, Demi Moore's character uses the phrase in an objection, and then it's pointed out that it's a meaningless phrase that only serves to make them look bad to the court. The purpose is to highlight how inexperienced she is as a trial lawyer, which makes it completely hilarious that these Trump lawyers are using it now.
Where would one get the facts of this case? MSNBC seems to be erring on the the side of impropriety relating to lying about the advent of their relationship more than the relatonship itself as a means for removal from the case, if such lying did happen.
Where would one get the facts of this case? MSNBC seems to be erring on the the side of impropriety relating to lying about the advent of their relationship more than the relatonship itself as a means for removal from the case, if such lying did happen.
Willis is pissed.
I guess I would be too if they implicated I was sleeping around.
Just tuning in. The examination of Fanni Willis is kind of meandering and lacking a point right now. Sounds like asking the same question 3 different times. Have to remind myself that this is a common interrogation technique to frustrate and try to poke holes in depositions.Yep.
Still not seeing a point to this line of questioning.
Still not seeing a point to this line of questioning.
Yeah, this lawyer is not asking good questions, LOL. Fani Willis is filling in a ton of details for her because her questions are so bad.
Fani Willis going into way more detail than she's asking for repeatedly because she can't ask specific questions.
How's Fani Willis holding up?
Also the prosecutor is an a****** who keeps f***ing yelling at her. He's so weirdly aggressive