W trash is as w trash doesBut the suspects are black
Prak at approximately 5:30 a.m. took the boys cellphone and called his father, Columbus CBS affiliate WBNS reported. She reportedly demanded that the father pay them $3,000, telling him that she caught his son inside her car and he had damaged her ignition switch. Prak allegedly threatened the father, saying that they would not release his boy until the ransom money was sent using the Cash App.
W trash is as w trash does
Why would you hold him for ransom100%
You fucking won when you caught him, y'all are dumb, Do Not Pass Go
But the suspects are black
All this over a kia.
They done fucked up holding him ransom and i hope they get the book thrown at themCause the kids here in Ohio are not being held accountable
Wonder why they felt the need to take matters into their own hands and not just rely on the police we all love to take care of it
I wonder if the ransom was for the cost of car repairs
Should have just the kid in the knee and cured I thought he was pulling a gun. Then at least he's fucked after getting released 24hrs after bookingFuck off.
Holding the kid till police arrived or something probably would've been okay.
Ransoming them is a mega WTF though.
Cause the kids here in Ohio are not being held accountable
Holding the kid till police arrived or something probably would've been okay.
Ransoming them is a mega WTF though.
Holding the kid till police arrived or something probably would've been okay.This
Ransoming them is a mega WTF though.
Wouldn't that be all the more reason to take the kid to the police instead of holding him for ransom?No, because usually when the situation is that the law doesn't hold people accountable, it plays out in the form of either police failing to push charges or the courts failing to give meaningful sentences.
No, because usually when the situation is that the law doesn't hold people accountable, it plays out in the form of either police failing to push charges or the courts failing to give meaningful sentences.
I can fully see how someone frustrated with this would resort to taking the law into their own hands, and I don't really blame them. Those who are upset about the course of events here should be directing that anger at the police, the courts, and the legislators who are allowing a soft-on-crime approach to prevail, instead of at people who tried to bring consequences to those that the law was failing to do anything about, because this likely would not have happened otherwise.
No, because usually when the situation is that the law doesn't hold people accountable, it plays out in the form of either police failing to push charges or the courts failing to give meaningful sentences.It is not the police who push the charges but the District Attorney.
I can fully see how someone frustrated with this would resort to taking the law into their own hands, and I don't really blame them. Those who are upset about the course of events here should be directing that anger at the police, the courts, and the legislators who are allowing a soft-on-crime approach to prevail, instead of at people who tried to bring consequences to those that the law was failing to do anything about, because this likely would not have happened otherwise.
It is not the police who push the charges but the District Attorney.Which exact person / organisation is responsible doesn't really change anything. It's the Police themselves here; it's different in the US maybe but if the end result is the same, so is the motivation for people to take matters into their own hands.