David Duke and Richard Spencer CELEBRATE Trump for DEFENDING Nazi's!!!

Former KKK Leader David Duke has THANKED President Trump on Twitter for condemning the alt-left after Trump went on camera today blaming "both sides" but particularly the "alt-left" for STARTING it because they had "clubs".

Although videos tell a different story as the alt-right groups were the ones carrying guns and clubs and attacking the protesters

Trump then went on to say there are "good people" among the 6000 nazi's and white supremacists in the bunch

Duke was delighted by Trump as he's "telling it like it is" and condemnned the "leftist terorrists in BLM/Antifa".

Trump's remarks came after violence erupted in the Unite the Right rally and it took Trump 48 hours to denounce the far right initially on saying there was "hatred and violence on both sides"

The Daily Stormer then stated Trump was on THEIR SIDE as Trump went on to say at the conference "What about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, alt-right. Do you have any semblance of guilt? Let ask you this, what about the fact they came charging with clubs in their hands, Do they have any problem? Tell me, what is an alt-right?"

Trump earlier today retweeted a tweet from a FAR-RIGHT activist of the "trump train" running down CNN

Richard Spencer then praised trump and celebrated the conference by blaming the left as he previously called for an "peaceful ethnic cleansing" of America to stop European culture being "deconstructed"

Trump enchoed that by stating the removal of the statues is the destruction of their "culture"

The League of the South also said that Trump understands that immigration from non-european countries is destroying America by turning them into a THIRD WORLD

Trump is known to value Loyalty among all else and no matter what white nationalists do, he is known to give them his thanks as they give him their vote

Would you be happy if Trump is impeached?

Racists -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/434872F000000578-4794170-Thanks_Ex_KKK_leader_David_Duke_thanked_Donald_Trump_on_Twitter_-a-5_1502841233970.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/4347EC2A00000578-4794170-Outburst_Trump_said_that_antifascist_groups_were_also_responsibl-a-6_1502841234060.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/43488B6100000578-4794170-Fan_Duke_pictured_had_supported_Trump_s_run_for_president_He_was-a-3_1502841233969.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/43487EF500000578-4794170-_Fair_White_supremacist_Richard_Spencer_said_Trump_s_statement_w-a-4_1502841233970.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/43487EF900000578-4794170-_Great_Faith_and_Heritage_who_describes_himself_as_Confederate_A-a-2_1502841233969.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/43487EF100000578-4794170-_In_a_lather_Michael_Hill_president_of_the_League_of_the_South_e-a-7_1502841234299.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/4348AF0B00000578-4794170-image-a-9_1502841234306.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/16/00/4348AF1400000578-4794170-_Winning_Twitter_user_FashyMatthias_said_that_Trump_essentially_-a-8_1502841234305.jpg

Again, not actual Nazis. And Trump condemned supremacists just yesterday.

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis

What are Neo-Nazis then?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXOkKMwIBo8&feature=youtu.be&t=13m25s

Im not finished, Fake News

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis. And Trump condemned supremacists just yesterday.

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Nobody who hears or says "feminazi" thinks that it means the feminists in question are literal nazis, so of course he wouldn't take a similarly hardline stance when that term is used.

Not that I agree with Zeus, mind you, I just think your rebuttal is dumb.

Currant_Kaiser posted...

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Nobody who hears or says "feminazi" thinks that it means the feminists in question are literal nazis, so of course he wouldn't take a similarly hardline stance when that term is used.

Not that I agree with Zeus, mind you, I just think your rebuttal is dumb.

OK, here's a better rebuttal: They are LITERALLY SELF-PROCLAIMED Nazis. This isn't hyperbole or Godwin's Law. They CALL themselves Nazis. They waved the flag, wore the armbands, and chanted "Blood and Soil", among other things.

They were Nazis* (*and technically, white supremacists were mixed in too, a la the KKK, but I don't care enough to make the distinction between the 2).

CyborgSage00x0 posted...

Currant_Kaiser posted...

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Nobody who hears or says "feminazi" thinks that it means the feminists in question are literal nazis, so of course he wouldn't take a similarly hardline stance when that term is used.

Not that I agree with Zeus, mind you, I just think your rebuttal is dumb.

OK, here's a better rebuttal: They are LITERALLY SELF-PROCLAIMED Nazis. This isn't hyperbole or Godwin's Law. They CALL themselves Nazis. They waved the flag, wore the armbands, and chanted "Blood and Soil", among other things.

They were Nazis* (*and technically, white supremacists were mixed in too, a la the KKK, but I don't care enough to make the distinction between the 2).

There we go.

Currant_Kaiser posted...

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Nobody who hears or says "feminazi" thinks that it means the feminists in question are literal nazis, so of course he wouldn't take a similarly hardline stance when that term is used.

Not that I agree with Zeus, mind you, I just think your rebuttal is dumb.

While your point would be valid if that was all he was doing, his current schitck is quoting the ToU's position on calling people Nazis (which dates from a fairly specific time in GameFAQs history that isn't particularly applicable anymore), as well as invoking the dismissive "you call everyone you disagree with Nazis" defense. Packaging all of that together while still being okay with "feminazi" should be invoking some pretty major cognitive dissonance, for the self-aware.

chelle posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis

What are Neo-Nazis then?

Well, I know that they're both supposedly white supremacists so maybe. It's certainly not demonstrably false.

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Again, not actual Nazis.

Given how adamant(ly wrong) you are about this, am I correct in presuming that you take a similarly hardline stance whenever the term "feminazi" is used, and never use the term yourself under any circumstances?

Given how adamantly stupid your attempt at an example is, do you still want me to answer it? If so, here's my response:


CyborgSage00x0 posted...

OK, here's a better rebuttal: They are LITERALLY SELF-PROCLAIMED Nazis. This isn't hyperbole or Godwin's Law. They CALL themselves Nazis. They waved the flag, wore the armbands, and chanted "Blood and Soil", among other things.

What if they called themselves Apache and appropriated their look, etc? Would you call them Apache? What if they dressed like jedi knights and called themselves that. Would you call them jedi? Not that it really matters because they wouldn't be either, but it'd be lulz if you did.

adjl posted...

While your point would be valid if that was all he was doing, his current schitck is quoting the ToU's position on calling people Nazis (which dates from a fairly specific time in GameFAQs history that isn't particularly applicable anymore), as well as invoking the dismissive "you call everyone you disagree with Nazis" defense. Packaging all of that together while still being okay with "feminazi" should be invoking some pretty major cognitive dissonance, for the self-aware.

Given that the term "feminazi" has zero historical connection with an actual group that did anything of significance, your claim is beyond stupid and a lame justification for trying to skirt the ToU by using Nazi as an insult. However, if you actually believe that shit you say...
"Calling someone a "Nazi" shows that not only have you absolutely no grasp of history, but it's also a flame, and a TOS violation."

Zeus posted...

What if they called themselves Apache and appropriated their look, etc? Would you call them Apache? What if they dressed like jedi knights and called themselves that. Would you call them jedi? Not that it really matters because they wouldn't be either, but it'd be lulz if you did.

Are you really going to be so pedantic that I have to clarify that I obviously mean *Neo-Nazi?

CyborgSage00x0 posted...

Zeus posted...

What if they called themselves Apache and appropriated their look, etc? Would you call them Apache? What if they dressed like jedi knights and called themselves that. Would you call them jedi? Not that it really matters because they wouldn't be either, but it'd be lulz if you did.

Are you really going to be so pedantic that I have to clarify that I obviously mean *Neo-Nazi?

Well, yes since you only call them nazis

Zeus posted...

Given that the term "feminazi" has zero historical connection with an actual group that did anything of significance

... Did you seriously suggest that the term "feminazi" is not derived from the name of any other group? You just keep finding new sharks to jump, don't you?

SmokeMassTree posted...

Well, yes since you only call them nazis

The term "neo-nazi" refers to followers of the Nazi party's ideals in a post-WWII world, effectively Nazis of whatever era qualifies as "modern" when the term is being used. Given how unlikely it is that anyone discussing the matter has invented time travel, it really shouldn't be too much of a stretch to realize that people that are talking about Nazis in a modern context are discussing neo-Nazis, without the need to explicitly specify.

It really depends on how the impeachment goes. Pence might be worse, albeit in the opposite direction. At the very least, Trump has destroyed establishment politics, and thank god for that. The post-Trump America will never go back to pre-Trump America.

adjl posted...

... Did you seriously suggest that the term "feminazi" is not derived from the name of any other group?

It derives the negativity of nazism, it does not mean feminazis want to gas jews or really share any ideals with nazism.

adjl posted...

The term "neo-nazi" refers to followers of the Nazi party's ideals in a post-WWII world, effectively Nazis of whatever era qualifies as "modern" when the term is being used.

neo-

combining form
1.
new.
"neonate"

They are new nazis like new coke, a group with the same underlying direction but handled with very different ingredients with a new flavour. Nazis follow the old WWII methodology with the same old intents, neo nazis are the new, reformed group.

They aren't good or right but they are distinctly different.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

It derives the negativity of nazism, it does not mean feminazis want to gas jews or really share any ideals with nazism.

So it's an example of just using the term "Nazi" to describe someone you don't like? Oh hey, we're back where we started!

Kyuubi4269 posted...

They are new nazis like new coke, a group with the same underlying direction but handled with very different ingredients with a new flavour. Nazis follow the old WWII methodology with the same old intents, neo nazis are the new, reformed group.

Ideologically (which is what's important here), they're the same thing. Neo-Nazis just look at history and realize they probably aren't going to be able to do what the original Nazis did, courtesy of pretty much everyone that isn't also a Nazi hating them, so they tend to try a more subtle approach in practice (which typically means periodic circle jerks where they compete to see who has the whitest semen, but occasionally they accomplish something less impotent).

adjl posted...

So it's an example of just using the term "Nazi" to describe someone you don't like? Oh hey, we're back where we started!

It's using the term to describe someone who's violently authoritarian.

adjl posted...

Ideologically (which is what's important here), they're the same thing. Neo-Nazis just look at history and realize they probably aren't going to be able to do what the original Nazis did, courtesy of pretty much everyone that isn't also a Nazi hating them, so they tend to try a more subtle approach in practice

So they're nazis that stopped doing the violent authoritarianism we associate with nazis? That indeed sounds like new and reformed nazis, neo-nazis if you will.

I propose we rename this board "what are nazis?". That seems to be what it's about now.

Omg guys I figured it out

#1 take any cause
#2 bring in real neonazis
#3 integrate them into the protesters
#4 instant hate for that entire protest

So we can get rid of extreme feminists!

Its ingenious!

Can you imagine it?

Feminist:
"that fast food worker sexually assaulted me with his mind when he handed my burger"

Nazi protesting with her:
"Yeah fuck that dude, seig heil!"

Result:
everyone hates feminazis now

Honestly Nazis could ruin anything nowadays by just liking or standing up for the same thing

dioxxys posted...

Omg guys I figured it out

#1 take any cause
#2 bring in real neonazis
#3 integrate them into the protesters
#4 instant hate for that entire protest

So we can get rid of extreme feminists!

Its ingenious!

Can you imagine it?

Feminist:
"that fast food worker sexually assaulted me with his mind when he handed my burger"

Nazi holding up protest sign near her:
"Yeah fuck that dude, seig heil!"

Result:
everyone hates feminazis now

lol

this would probably work

TheCyborgNinja posted...

It really depends on how the impeachment goes. Pence might be worse, albeit in the opposite direction. At the very least, Trump has destroyed establishment politics, and thank god for that. The post-Trump America will never go back to pre-Trump America.

I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion, when basically everyone is basically begging for the WH to return to "normal."

adjl posted...

Zeus posted...

Given that the term "feminazi" has zero historical connection with an actual group that did anything of significance

... Did you seriously suggest that the term "feminazi" is not derived from the name of any other group? You just keep finding new sharks to jump, don't you?

Literally the whole modifier changes the meaning. Unless you think "grammar nazis" go around sticking people in ovens. Stop being purposefully or inadvertently dense.

adjl posted...

SmokeMassTree posted...

Well, yes since you only call them nazis

The term "neo-nazi" refers to followers of the Nazi party's ideals in a post-WWII world, effectively Nazis of whatever era qualifies as "modern" when the term is being used. Given how unlikely it is that anyone discussing the matter has invented time travel, it really shouldn't be too much of a stretch to realize that people that are talking about Nazis in a modern context are discussing neo-Nazis, without the need to explicitly specify.

Which is a lame justification for the indefensible. As always:
"Calling someone a "Nazi" shows that not only have you absolutely no grasp of history, but it's also a flame, and a TOS violation."

Zeus posted...

Literally the whole modifier changes the meaning. Unless you think "grammar nazis" go around sticking people in ovens. Stop being purposefully or inadvertently dense.

... Are you suggesting that "grammar Nazi" also isn't derived from "Nazi"? Seriously, you should take this shark-finding ability to the WWF. They could use it to help endangered populations recover, even if you have a bizarre compulsion to jump over them when you find them.

Zeus posted...

Which is a lame justification for the indefensible. As always:
"Calling someone a "Nazi" shows that not only have you absolutely no grasp of history, but it's also a flame, and a TOS violation."

Do you just struggle with the concept of non-explicit communication?

adjl posted...

... Are you suggesting that "grammar Nazi" also isn't derived from "Nazi"? Seriously, you should take this shark-finding ability to the WWF. They could use it to help endangered populations recover, even if you have a bizarre compulsion to jump over them when you find them.

You mean the endangered Ric Flairs. More importantly, do you call grammar nazis actual Nazis? Do you call feminazis actual Nazis? No? Why is that, then? Because they're NOT the same thing and it's fucking confusing to imply that they are?

adjl posted...

Do you just struggle with the concept of non-explicit communication?

Asks the guy who just doesn't get it. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Zeus posted...

More importantly, do you call grammar nazis actual Nazis? Do you call feminazis actual Nazis? No? Why is that, then? Because they're NOT the same thing and it's f***ing confusing to imply that they are?

How are you struggling with the idea that "Grammar Nazi" and "Feminazi" are derived from "Nazi"? It's literally in the name. And not just "literally" in the sense of "the 'neo-' is clearly implied for anyone that isn't being needlessly pedantic to avoid having to deal with being on the same side as Nazis," 100% literally and unambiguously right there.

Zeus posted...

Asks the guy who just doesn't get it. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Would you care to use your dizzying intellect to explain why "neo-" isn't implied in talking about the modern iteration of any historical group? Because here I thought we all knew nobody was time traveling.

adjl posted...

How are you struggling with the idea that "Grammar Nazi" and "Feminazi" are derived from "Nazi"? It's literally in the name. And not just "literally" in the sense of "the 'neo-' is clearly implied for anyone that isn't being needlessly pedantic to avoid having to deal with being on the same side as Nazis," 100% literally and unambiguously right there.

Because that's not the point of contention. The point is that the modifier exists SPECIALLY to separate them from ACTUAL Nazis. Otherwise you'd be calling them all Nazis which would be wrong and stupid, which I shouldn't have to explain but apparently you have absolutely no grasp of history

adjl posted...

Would you care to use your dizzying intellect to explain why "neo-" isn't implied in talking about the modern iteration of any historical group? Because here I thought we all knew nobody was time traveling.

Perhaps you can explain why you wouldn't just assume that they meant Grammar Nazis by that same token? We create new words and terms to differentiate things from existing things. If people literally meant Nazi then the term neo-nazi. Not a hard concept to grasp.

Also, back when you said WWF, I was going to make a joke about an endangered wrestler but then felt too sad to go through with it. I mention it because #WrestlersLivesMatter and that even includes that POS Jimmy Snuka who murdered his girlfriend and should be in prison right now.

Zeus posted...

Perhaps you can explain why you wouldn't just assume that they meant Grammar Nazis by that same token?

Because context exists. Charlottesville was not overrun by a mob of torch-toting English teachers angry about the decline of the semicolon; it's astronomically unlikely that anyone talking about a Nazi march this week would be talking about grammar Nazis and not skinheads.

Moreover, "neo-" doesn't narrow down the term beyond the time period. It's the catch-all phrase for the Nazi ideology's manifestation in a post-WWII world. Neo-Nazis are, by definition, the Nazis of today, much like neo-classical music is classical music composed more recently than 1825 (using the term colloquially, rather than getting into the rigid specifics of artistic eras). That doesn't mean somebody describing John Williams' work as "classical" is wrong, it just means they've left the modifier to be implicit in hopes that the audience will realize that 1970 wasn't 1825. Most audiences will, because most people talking about the genre of John Williams' work aren't being needlessly pedantic in hopes that they can avoid confronting the fact that they're on the same side as Nazis. Musical discussions usually involving less cognitive dissonance and whatnot.

zeus isn't even trying to hide the fact that he's one of them now

My friend sent this to me, and I needed to share it somewhere.