Current Events > Democrats who say they want to replace their party leaders; 62%

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://x.com/kenklippenstein/status/1940477687065436296

I don't even know who their leaders are anymore. Is David Hogg still one of them?

FLOUR posted...

I don't even know who their leaders are anymore

I guess that's what the other 24% said lol

Thanks, Jo. As Republicans are poised to rip away healthcare from tens of millions and shut down rural hospitals while killing hundreds of thousands across Africa and opening up concentration camps with official merchandise, it's great you're here to remind us about the real issues because you religious follow the feed of a right wing shill whose one job in life is to keep people hating Democrats.

Thanks a ton, man. What would we do without you here? Here I was thinking the big issue is the BBB about to pass the House and was all ready to focus my rage on Murkowski and Collins but you valiantly came in with the reminder that Chuck Schumer sucks. Thank you for that. From the bottom of all our hearts.

FLOUR posted...

I don't even know who their leaders are anymore. Is David Hogg still one of them?

David Hogg is out after making the DNC party leader cry and vacating his seat when it was found that the vice chair elections were held in error cause the positions weren't properly apportioned based on gender.

A_Good_Boy posted...

David Hogg is out after making the DNC party leader cry and vacating his seat when it was found that the vice chair elections were held in error cause the positions weren't properly apportioned based on gender.

David Hogg is out because he was elected to do a job where the one solitary requirement was "raise money to defeat Republicans" and he very publicly refused to do that.

LightSnake posted...

Thanks, Jo. As Republicans are poised to rip away healthcare from tens of millions and shut down rural hospitals while killing hundreds of thousands across Africa and opening up concentration camps with official merchandise, it's great you're here to remind us about the real issues because you religious follow the feed of a right wing shill whose one job in life is to keep people hating Democrats.

Thanks a ton, man. What would we do without you here? Here I was thinking the big issue is the BBB about to pass the House and was all ready to focus my rage on Murkowski and Collins but you valiantly came in with the reminder that Chuck Schumer sucks. Thank you for that. From the bottom of all our hearts.

Hes just posting an article. You're getting really unhinged lately.

FLOUR posted...

I don't even know who their leaders are anymore. Is David Hogg still one of them?

David is too in-touch, young, and not as corrupt as them, so no he was ousted

LightSnake posted...

David Hogg is out because he was elected to do a job where the one solitary requirement was "raise money to defeat Republicans" and he very publicly refused to do that.

"defeat Republicans" via acknowledging the parties issue with complacent incumbents that don't motivate the base to vote, hence the 62% disapproval.

chaos_knight posted...

Hes just posting an article. You're getting really unhinged lately.

Perhaps you're unfamiliar with Jo's posting. Everyone was calling him out for the same thing yesterday because he does nothing but post "Dems suck" and never says a peep about Trump

chaos_knight posted...

Hes just posting an article. You're getting really unhinged lately.

A tweet is an article?

A_Good_Boy posted...

"defeat Republicans" via acknowledging the parties issue with complacent incumbents that don't motivate the base to vote, hence the 62% disapproval.

If David Hogg wants to fund and list challenges to incumbents, that is his right to do so. It is also not something conducive to remaining a chair of the DNC because "go after Democrats" is not something a chair is supposed to do.

I collected 2 new tags for 2 people in this topic!

"DINO" and "gaslighter"

LightSnake posted...

Perhaps you're unfamiliar with Jo's posting. Everyone was calling him out for the same thing yesterday because he does nothing but post "Dems suck" and never says a peep about Trump

He posts shock shit all the time but that was a large rant you did against him.

LightSnake posted...

If David Hogg wants to fund and list challenges to incumbents, that is his right to do so. It is also not something conducive to remaining a chair of the DNC because "go after Democrats" is not something a chair is supposed to do.

Yeah I guess what they're supposed to do is cry cause the 20 year old is being mean to them cause they gotta do more than just want to go to the beach.

chaos_knight posted...

He posts shock shit all the time but that was a large rant you did against him.

"Large rant" and it's less than 130 words.

A_Good_Boy posted...

Yeah I guess what they're supposed to do is cry cause the 20 year old is being mean to them cause they gotta do more than just want to go to the beach.

Did John Fetterman have a role in the DNC now?

Also https://www.politicspa.com/dnc-announces-organize-everywhere-win-anywhere-50-state-strategy/141301/

The DNC is literally laying out strategies to challenge Republicans everywhere in a new 50 state strategy.

David Hogg was funneling money into his PAC, guys. We really wanna elevate that type of shit?

LightSnake posted...

"Large rant" and it's less than 130 words.

Two lengthy paragraphs. Seriously, calm down.

chaos_knight posted...

Two lengthy paragraphs. Seriously, calm down.

You're coming into the last 95% of a conversation.

You think that was ranty and insulting, you should have seen what both LS and I said about the dude yesterday.

LightSnake posted...

Did John Fetterman have a role in the DNC now?

Also https://www.politicspa.com/dnc-announces-organize-everywhere-win-anywhere-50-state-strategy/141301/

The DNC is literally laying out strategies to challenge Republicans everywhere in a new 50 state strategy.

The party will get props when it delivers results. That article came out in April, what have they actually done since then that's supposed to inspire confidence? Cause I've seen an awful lot of uninspiring nonsense since then from Dems.

DrizztLink posted...

You're coming into the last 95% of a conversation.

You think that was ranty and insulting, you should have seen what both LS and I said about the dude yesterday.

I for one think it's a little sus Jo has posted literally not once about the bill about to pass the house and be signed into law

A_Good_Boy posted...

Cause I've seen an awful lot of uninspiring nonsense since then from Dems.

Can you name which ones so we know who to primary?

Unknown5uspect posted...

Can you name which ones so we know who to primary?

Start with Ro Khanna. Fuck that guy.

A_Good_Boy posted...

Start with Ro Khanna. Fuck that guy.

Oh that mfer shoulda been gone.

chaos knight is literally just gaslighting for no reason, he's gonna say the opposite of w/e someone else says

A_Good_Boy posted...

The party will get props when it delivers results. That article came out in April, what have they actually done since then that's supposed to inspire confidence? Cause I've seen an awful lot of uninspiring nonsense since then from Dems.

Have there been any national primaries or elections since April they should be involved in?

Also, it kind seems that there is real logic to "DNC chairs should not be engaging in primaries." You can't really shut that door when people who don't agree with you start trying to unseat the people you do like.

A_Good_Boy posted...

Start with Ro Khanna. Fuck that guy.

Hey, agree on this. He's a shill for Silicon Valley who pretends to be a progressive.

Robot2600 posted...

chaos knight is literally just gaslighting for no reason, he's gonna say the opposite of w/e someone else says

He's also buddies with FlamingSchoolBus, the chud who started the MAGA boards where they openly celebrated Jan 6th.

Robot2600 posted...

I collected 2 new tags for 2 people in this topic!

"DINO" and "gaslighter"

Two new "chud" tags for me.

It doesn't help that some of those people want a more moderate Democratic leadership and some want a more progressive one.

"Different" doesn't mean the same for everyone

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Thanks for the advice, totally legit account who never post here

emblem-man posted...

It doesn't help that some of those people want a more moderate Democratic leadership and some want a more progressive one.

"Different" doesn't mean the same for everyone

What could possibly be more "moderate" than losing to openly fascist dipshits and going "It's OK everyone, just stay the course and things will swing back our way"?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

No, I think he's just implying that you're another of the mothballed chud alts that the last few MAGA hangers-on are slowly working their way through.

I mean youre a 2009 account with 1400 karma. That screams "alt account".

Democratic voters who want to do it badly enough to show up for a primary election: ?? %

ONLY 62%? How?

BewmHedshot posted...

Democratic voters who want to do it badly enough to show up for a primary election: ?? %

Honestly you're right.

Democrats say they want their party leaders replaced but they've shown they don't show up at the polls when it's needed, and/or just vote for people they're familiar with which is the same old establishment Democrats. This whole country is filled with morons.

I hope people get off their damn butts and vote in people in the midterms to make Trump ineffective, if it still happens of course. It ain't even been a year and he's destroying the country.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I didn't call you a right winger. You jumped to that entirely by yourself for totally innocent reasons I'm sure

Should be 100%

I wonder how many of those 62% could point to specific people they want removed and/or individuals they'd want to replace them, because this kind of general disapproval for a large or somewhat nebulously-defined group doesn't always actually translate to much real turnover.

BewmHedshot posted...

Democratic voters who want to do it badly enough to show up for a primary election: ?? %

I mean, they did for Zohran. Go look at the election data. But yeah they need to do that going forward too

Should be higher, Democrat leadership fucking sucks

MaxEffingBemis posted...

I mean, they did for Zohran. Go look at the election data. But yeah they need to do that going forward too

Probably helps that Cuomo relied solely on name recognition and didn't attempt any serious campaigning like Zohran.

Tmaster148 posted...

Probably helps that Cuomo relied solely on name recognition and didn't attempt any serious campaigning like Zohran.

Well that and making the whole race an Israel thing. But you have to give Zohran credit for getting the youth vote out regardless