Current Events > Theres videos of Lauren Boebert getting felt up and giving an over the pants hj

(+) Yeah! (+)

Villain_S_Fiend posted...

Doing it in the theater (or other "risky" spots) is part of the fun for some folks. It's not just the presence of dicks and titties. Lighten up and have some fun with your sex. Unless you're asexual (no judgment there - totally cool), in which case just stay out of it.

It doesn't matter. She's a worthless hypocrite and she'd be the first calling to eject someone from Congress and have them arrested for sex crimes if they did this while Democrat. The Democrats need to start fighting back dirty.

People who are two-faced deserve to have their lives destroyed.

hockeybub89 posted...

It doesn't matter. She's a worthless hypocrite and she'd be the first calling to eject someone from Congress and have them arrested for sex crimes if they did this while Democrat. The Democrats need to start fighting back dirty.

People who are two-faced deserve to have their lives destroyed.

Nobody would get arrested for sex crimes for this

Trespassing charges maybe, idk the laws there.

As for getting her life destroyed though I'm on board. Didn't she kill her neighbors dog sometime back?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Fair, I misread it.

That's pretty hot ngl

AOC next please.

RuneterranSnap posted...

And it can be extremely uncomfortable for the people around you. Don't do it.

I'm better at it than those two turds. And besides, if you do it where others see and they object, you'll likely have consequences for it and that's the risk you take.

hockeybub89 posted...

It doesn't matter. She's a worthless hypocrite and she'd be the first calling to eject someone from Congress and have them arrested for sex crimes if they did this while Democrat. The Democrats need to start fighting back dirty.

People who are two-faced deserve to have their lives destroyed.

Oh, she's a piece of shit for sure. I wasn't responding in a way to defend her, just to push back against prudish shaming in general.

Think the funniest thing from this topic is being accused of being a MAGA.

chaos_knight posted...

Think the funniest thing from this topic is being accused of being a MAGA.

Well, you are friends with FSB, sooooo......

ooger posted...

Well, you are friends with FSB, sooooo......

I haven't talked to him in 10 years or so.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/3/4/AAb05zAAE2Ve.jpg

This thread summed up:

Reasonable people: People shouldn't perform set acts on one another in a public place, especially if children are present.

Unreasonable (likely MAGAs) people: Well acktually...

She rubbed on my Beetle til I juice

The dude she was jerking is a democrat. Thatll be the final nail in her coffin and shell have no chance in her next race. Republicans cheer on the most vile shit but shell never live that down.

CE_gonna_CE posted...

She's mashing it.

Will_VIII posted...

This thread summed up:

Reasonable people: People shouldn't perform set acts on one another in a public place, especially if children are present.

Unreasonable (likely MAGAs) people: Well acktually...

Reasonable people are saying the groping wasn't a sex act and wasn't even the worst thing she did in the theater.

link?

RuneterranSnap posted...

Reasonable people are saying the groping wasn't a sex act and wasn't even the worst thing she did in the theater.

Anyone claiming groping/jerking your date/husband/boyfriends dick in the middle of a crowded theater while also drawing attention to yourself, aren't reasonable people.

To make it worse, Beetlejuice isn't geared towards adults. Meaning there's a good chance this was done around children.

Reasonable people aren't calling this no big deal, or acting like this is the same as posting on a porn website.

asdf8562 posted...

Anyone claiming groping/jerking your date/husband/boyfriends dick in the middle of a crowded theater while also drawing attention to yourself, aren't reasonable people.

I dont think she was intending to call attention to herself, but thats a fair point. Drawing attention to yourself then doing it is VERY different.

RuneterranSnap posted...

I dont think she was intending to call attention to herself, but thats a fair point. Drawing attention to yourself then doing it is VERY different.

How hard it must be to think to yourself "hey maybe I shouldn't act lewd in a public space with children"

reducing "just a handy in a crowded theater were kids were present" to "don't be a prude" statement is a lead chip eating take

Will_VIII posted...

How hard it must be to think to yourself "hey maybe I shouldn't act lewd in a public space with children"

How hard is it for you to understand I don't think it's ok? I don't think it's nearly as big a deal as you're making it out to be and I think her other behavior their was worse, but that doesn't mean I think it's ok.

RuneterranSnap posted...

I dont think she was intending to call attention to herself, but thats a fair point. Drawing attention to yourself then doing it is VERY different.

Lol to it even mattering if it was intended or not.

It's public space at a public theater at a theater not intended for children.

RuneterranSnap posted...

How hard is it for you to understand I don't think it's ok? I don't think it's nearly as big a deal as you're making it out to be and I think her other behavior their was worse, but that doesn't mean I think it's ok.

This is why people think you're a caricature

Will_VIII posted...

This is why people think you're a caricature

Cry harder. Sorry if I'm more upset at their behavior that directly impacts the people around them, and at their refusal to leave and the general hypocrisy of it, than at some minor groping that didn't actually cause any harm and at worst was just done in too public of a place.

You're acting like she did some horrific act that shoukd be banned from public. The reality is the only reason this was bad at all was the close confines and that she'd been creating a nuisance in other ways, and if she'd done it in a park or something similar there'd have been zero issue and you'd have been told to mind your business rightfully so.

Beetlejuice musical is PG-13, but drunken ball fondling isn't.

RuneterranSnap posted...

Cry harder. Sorry if I'm more upset at their behavior that directly impacts the people around them, and at their refusal to leave and the general hypocrisy of it, than at some minor groping that didn't actually cause any harm and at worst was just done in too public of a place.

You're acting like she did some horrific act that shoukd be banned from public. The reality is the only reason this was bad at all was the close confines and that she'd been creating a nuisance in other ways, and if she'd done it in a park or something similar there'd have been zero issue and you'd have been told to mind your business rightfully so.

I think she should end up an RSO yeah

Will_VIII posted...

I think she should end up an RSO yeah

You think wrong and are being exceptionally ridiculous even for you.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ORG8K3BmAo

Against public urination, but trying to get a man to release another fluid in public sheesh, what a loon.

RuneterranSnap posted...

You think wrong and are being exceptionally ridiculous even for you.

She committed an offence that would get you and me on the register.

ADW posted...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ORG8K3BmAo

Against public urination, but trying to get a man to release another fluid in public sheesh, what a loon.

She married a man who pulled his penis out to her at a bowling alley when she was underaged.

spikethedevil posted...

She committed an offence that would get you and me on the register.

Yeah you're gonna need to cite a law on that.

"If this was an entirely different scenario in a different location involving different people, it would be no big deal."

Stunning observation from Octillery.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

As in "the only reason it's inappropriate at all is the close quarters, the act itself was extremely mild and not even worth noting in normal circumstances "

RuneterranSnap posted...

Cry harder. Sorry if I'm more upset at their behavior that directly impacts the people around them, and at their refusal to leave and the general hypocrisy of it, than at some minor groping that didn't actually cause any harm and at worst was just done in too public of a place.

You're acting like she did some horrific act that shoukd be banned from public. The reality is the only reason this was bad at all was the close confines and that she'd been creating a nuisance in other ways, and if she'd done it in a park or something similar there'd have been zero issue and you'd have been told to mind your business rightfully so.

Would you vote for her?

She doesn't seem very capable or smart.

hockeybub89 posted...

"If this was an entirely different scenario in a different location involving different people, it would be no big deal."

Stunning observation from Octillery.

Stunningly bad reading comprehension even for you two.

Pr are you just trolling because being mindlessly angry is all you have to do?

ooger posted...

Would you vote for her?

She doesn't seem very capable or smart.

I wouldn't have voted for her before.

RuneterranSnap posted...

and if she'd done it in a park or something similar there'd have been zero issue and you'd have been told to mind your business rightfully so.

So youre saying if they were doing this in a park and a cop passed by hed do nothing about it?

spikethedevil posted...

She committed an offence that would get you and me on the register.

Right. It's really not this difficult.

ADW posted...

So youre saying if they were doing this in a park and a cop passed by hed do nothing about it?

^This. Depending on the cop you're possibly looking at a public indecency charge.

RuneterranSnap posted...

I wouldn't have voted for her before.

So, why are you sticking up for this kind of behaviour?

ADW posted...

So youre saying if they were doing this in a park and a cop passed by hed do nothing about it?

I'm saying it's not a crime legally(far as I'm aware still waiting on actual examples) and nothing would be wrong with it morally or ethically if they aren't trying to draw attention to it.

Will_VIII posted...

Right. It's really not this difficult.

Will_VIII posted...

Right. It's really not this difficult.

Well neith3 of you seem to come up with any example of over the clothes touching being a crime in public.

I'm not reading this entire topic or watching a ten hour video, skipped around to saw the boobage roaming and some thigh slaps.

Did the security/team who talked to them 3-4 times and escort them out "catch" them in the act/get them in trouble, or was it an unrelated escort to get them out of there for some other reason? Neither party looked too bothered or worried when they got up and left.

RuneterranSnap posted...

I'm saying it's not a crime legally(far as I'm aware still waiting on actual examples) and nothing would be wrong with it morally or ethically if they aren't trying to draw attention to it.

Well neith3 of you seem to come up with any example of over the clothes touching being a crime in public.

You're not worth the effort on this.

ooger posted...

So, why are you sticking up for this kind of behaviour?

I'm not for this specific incident. I've said so repeatedly.

I'm saying the outrage over the groping is overblown, as evidenced by people seeming to not even know what happened like STM and others thinking it should qualify for sex offended registry. Not even would, which is it's own special kind of wrong, but should.

RuneterranSnap posted...

I'm not for this specific incident. I've said so repeatedly.

I'm saying the outrage over the groping is overblown, as evidenced by people seeming to not even know what happened like STM and others thinking it should qualify for sex offended registry. Not even would, which is it's own special kind of wrong, but should.

That sure sounds like sticking up for her behaviour to me.