Current Events > Mexican Congress UFO/UAP discussion:

(+) Yeah! (+)

Caracalla posted...

If its top secret why are they telling us?

Jingle the keys

VFalcone posted...

That doesn't sound true. Some YouTubers "debunked" it but even on AARO's website, the Go Fast video is still officially unexplained. They're professionals. The 'Go Fast' video is most certainly NOT explained. Officially. They are not calling it aliens, but they 100% did not say it was explained in any form nor did they say anything about ducks.

It is an object flapping its wings at the cadence of a duck, its the size of a duck, going the speed of a duck, in a part of the world where we know ducks exist. Its a duck.

KitKats posted...

Yeah, they haven't been explained, that was just hot air from heavily biased YouTuber looking for clicks who are full of it. Fighter pilots are able to detect commercial flights and airlines because they use transponders. That was ruled out. Commercial flights do not travel through military training areas. Commercial airliners are also not capable of traveling from 80,000 ft. to 20,000 ft. in a matter of seconds. They confirmed it was some kind of intelligently operated craft through multiple independent systems though. These are the kinds of incidents that genuinely intrigue me, because we do not possess the capabilities demonstrated and reported on as actual craft of some kind.

NASA just debunked Go-Fast today actually, lmao. They debunked the duck debunk as well. It was an object of some form that drifted with the wind at 40mph. Colder than the ocean with essentially no heat signature, so it's suggested that it may have been a balloon.

Skankhair posted...

It is an object flapping its wings at the cadence of a duck, its the size of a duck, going the speed of a duck, in a part of the world where we know ducks exist. Its a duck.

NASA says no. Not a duck. Sorry. Not aliens, or a duck. Not even a living thing. They say it's a balloon or a drone

David Grusch completely lost me the moment he said Benito Mussolini had an UFO and that it was retrieved by the Vatican. Sounded like a failed plotline for a Dan Brown novel.

VFalcone posted...

NASA just debunked Go-Fast today actually, lmao. They debunked the duck debunk as well. It was an object of some form that drifted with the wind at 40mph. Colder than the ocean with essentially no heat signature, so it's suggested that it may have been a balloon.

I was speaking about the Nimitz and Princeton, as well as some others. GoFast didn't ever have any other information with that particular incident.

Skankhair posted...

Its true. It was proven to be a duck. It is even flapping its wings at the cadence of a duck.

No, you fell for bullshit.

Dude that's simply not true.

KitKats posted...

I was speaking about the Nimitz and Princeton, as well as some others. GoFast didn't ever have any other information with that particular incident. It's not something to be "debunked," btw. They weren't and aren't sure what they were tracking. The video is legitimate and from the military, not like a hoax or something.

The claims that the object exhibited anomalous properties (That it was moving in a rapid, extremely fast manner) were debunked. "Go Fast" didn't gain traction because it was a balloon-sized object that was moving at about the same speed as a wind current might. It gained traction because it looked like it was going MUCH faster.

Pogo_Marimo posted...

The claims that the object exhibited anomalous properties (That it was moving in a rapid, extremely fast manner) were debunked. "Go Fast" didn't gain traction because it was a balloon-sized object that was moving at about the same speed as a wind current might. It gained traction because it looked like it was going MUCH faster.

One thing's for sure... We really gotta keep our balloons in check

KINDERFELD posted...

Dude that's simply not true.

Its true, you just dont like the truth.

Its literally a duck. For a fact. Proven. Sorry.

Same size, speed, wing flapping cadence. A duck is a duck.

Skankhair posted...

Its true, you just dont like the truth.

Its literally a duck. For a fact. Proven. Sorry.

Same size, speed, wing flapping cadence. A duck is a duck.

NASA proved it wasn't a duck but keep clinging to your YouTube hero. It was a balloon or drone

Pogo_Marimo posted...

The claims that the object exhibited anomalous properties (That it was moving in a rapid, extremely fast manner) were debunked. "Go Fast" didn't gain traction because it was a balloon-sized object that was moving at about the same speed as a wind current might. It gained traction because it looked like it was going MUCH faster.

The video itself didn't come with those claims, that's random speculation from talking heads and the like. In depth analysis of the video has already shown for a long time it doesn't appear to be traveling at insane speeds or anything, it was released as something the military tracked and didn't know what it was. We still don't know what it is, but I never found it particularly compelling because it didn't come with any independent corroboration about what it was or speeds it was traveling at, etc. We still don't have a lot of information about it to say for sure what the object is, only conjecture.

I've not seen anyone link NASA's conclusions but again I doubt they had access to any kind of classified information about that particular incident, and there may not be any other data anyway. This is nothing new, basically. It's not a debunk, but ruling out possibilities, explanations, what the video is actually showing, etc.

KitKats posted...

I've not seen anyone link NASA's conclusions but again I doubt they had access to any kind of classified information about that particular incident, and there may not be any other data anyway. This is nothing new, basically. It's not a debunk, but ruling out possibilities, explanations, what the video is actually showing, etc.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16iix64/comment/k0jyigm/

Note: There's nothing about classified stuff like the Tic Tac and what not. But this in particular is about GoFast

VFalcone posted...

NASA proved it wasn't a duck but keep clinging to your YouTube hero. It was a balloon or drone

Lol no they didnt. It wasnt a drone or balloon, you can see the wings flapping when zoomed in.

wait is there still some discussion about this being true?

Skankhair posted...

Lol no they didnt. It wasnt a drone or balloon, you can see the wings flapping when zoomed in.

Dude do you not know what happened today???

VFalcone posted...

Dude do you not know what happened today???

I don't know what happened related to any duck video, how did nasa prove it wasn't a duck? You linked to nasa saying it was slower than first assumed, so is there some other statement about the duck?

Rai_Jin posted...

I don't know what happened related to any duck video, how did nasa prove it wasn't a duck? You linked to nasa saying it was slower than first assumed, so is there some other statement about the duck?

They didnt prove anything, only provided an analysis based on the contents of the video alone, which have already been completed by other parties that are less official with the same/similar results. Its conjecture at best with nothing definitive to be gleaned.

Rai_Jin posted...

I don't know what happened related to any duck video, how did nasa prove it wasn't a duck? You linked to nasa saying it was slower than first assumed, so is there some other statement about the duck?

They proved it wasn't a duck by analyzing the temperatures of the object and it's surroundings. The object didn't have a heat signature. Or rather, its signature was so low compared to its surroundings that it couldn't be an animal. A duck is a warm-blooded animal. They said the object was colder than the ocean for example. Which would be impossible if it were a duck because a duck's body temp is 107.5F. Therefore, it cannot be a duck. No, they did not say "This is not a duck". What they did was prove that it was a drifting object and not a creature.