Current Events > Neil Gorsuch joins Clarence Thomas' in shady property dealings

(+) Yeah! (+)

The Supreme Court justice did not report the identity of the purchaser, whose firm has had numerous cases before the court.

Gorsuch did not disclose the identity of the purchaser. That box was left blank.

~ https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/25/neil-gorsuch-colorado-property-sale-00093579

Selling a house, but keeping their identity blank? Hmm, where have I heard that before

In his financial disclosure forms from the year of the purchase, Thomas left blank a section for reporting the identities of parties involved in private transactions with the justice. Experts say the omission could constitute a direct violation of ethics laws, as disclosure is required for real estate sales or purchases over $1,000.

~ https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/clarence-thomas-family-got-133k-202148230.html

Oh, and FYI, Crow did have cases before the SCOTUS that Thomas didn't recuse himself for either
~ https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-didnt-recuse-case-involving-harlan-crow-bloomberg-2023-4

Why am I not surprised? I swear, for as much as this country mocks every lawyer alive as a snake and cheat, we sure do like to pretend they're all upstanding folk that follow the rules once they become judges.