Current Events > What Resident Evil should be remade next?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Yup.

None of them

Dead Aim

Zero

Garioshi posted...

None of them

Capcom has Chris Redfield under hallucigenetic drugs and he is convinced you are a boulder in the way of him getting to Wesker.

Choose or they let him at you.

Code Veronica or Zero

None. They were all fine as they were.

Code Veronica

Couldn't care less about 0 or Revelations, and 5 can wait on it's remake (though I wouldn't be disappointed if it didn't get one).

CaptainStrong posted...

None. They were all fine as they were.

Code Veronica, Zero, and Dead Aim are trash fires

Dino Crisis

Questionmarktarius posted...

Dino Crisis

A man of culture here.

Dino Crisis 3

Code Veronica.
Dino Crisis. I could never get into Dino Crisis. Maybe a remake could get me interested.
3 should be remade again (Not joking).

Unsuprised_Pika posted...

Capcom has Chris Redfield under hallucigenetic drugs and he is convinced you are a boulder in the way of him getting to Wesker.

Choose or they let him at you.

Fine, 0.

6.

Not really. I feel like making it cater to the fans would just make it lose its complexity. Since, the rest of the series never built on it. It wasn't what the fans wanted. I can respect that, but god damn is it mildly irritating to never see that gameplay built on for over a full generation

Lost_All_Senses posted...

6.

Not really. I feel like making it cater to the fans would just make it lose its complexity. Since, the rest of the series never built on it. It wasn't what the fans wanted. I can respect that, but god damn is it mildly irritating to never see that gameplay built on for over a full generation

We no longer deserve to see a version of RE6 with grace periods between enemy attacks, levels that just let you focus on the combat and a playable God Hand character.

ViewtifulJoe posted...

We no longer deserve to see a version of RE6 with grace periods between enemy attacks, levels that just let you focus on the combat and a playable God Hand character.

I don't know if you're on RE6's side or not. But regardless, I love you all the same and I just want you to be happy

Veronica, the real RE3

Sega should take a hint and maybe revive House of the Dead.

InTheEyesOfFire posted...

Sega should take a hint and maybe revive House of the Dead.

It was literally just remade

Lost_All_Senses posted...

6.

Not really. I feel like making it cater to the fans would just make it lose its complexity. Since, the rest of the series never built on it. It wasn't what the fans wanted. I can respect that, but god damn is it mildly irritating to never see that gameplay built on for over a full generation

I loved 6. Best couch co-op game I think I've played. The gameplay was really really good

Irony posted...

It was literally just remade

Ha, shows how much I pay attention to releases these days.

Agonized_rufous posted...

Veronica, the real RE3

It's not. It was never RE3 at any point in its development.

Lost_All_Senses posted...

I don't know if you're on RE6's side or not. But regardless, I love you all the same and I just want you to be happy

I've been trying to be nicer to RE6. I gave it another go a few years ago and I now like it a lot more than I did when it first came out and I was hoping it'd be as similar to 5 as 5 was to 4.
I think mercs is a lot of fun (I wish they'd buff Piers, let me play as C-Virus Piers and then go full fun mode and add playable Ustanak. And put RE5 Wesker in.)
The campaign's kinda dodgy, but pro difficulty, no inf ammo, agent hunt enabled spices a lot of it up.
I would have liked to see more of the good.

Agonized_rufous posted...

I loved 6. Best couch co-op game I think I've played. The gameplay was really really good

Yeah. I just had a frustrating conversation with a friend this morning that won't accept that the gameplay could be good because of how low the scores for it are. I tried explaining every angle lol.

The best way I could put it is. It's like rating a Monster Hunter game based on it story and the characters and ignoring the gameplay. People were looking at the parts that ended up not being the focus of what made it revolutionary.

And it didn't help that they didn't explain the complexity. So, if you go in there expecting RE5 and play it as RE5, you can go through the whole game without realizing any of the depth under the surface. Mercenaries is where you start playing around and accidentally stumbling upon the depth of the combat. It was so long ago, but Im pretty sure I went through at least 2 of the campaigns before figuring out the quickshot. Which is just scratching the surface

Garioshi posted...

It's not. It was never RE3 at any point in its development.

Whatever makes you feel better. That doesn't make me feel better

ViewtifulJoe posted...

I've been trying to be nicer to RE6. I gave it another go a few years ago and I now like it a lot more than I did when it first came out and I was hoping it'd be as similar to 5 as 5 was to 4.
I think mercs is a lot of fun (I wish they'd buff Piers, let me play as C-Virus Piers and then go full fun mode and add playable Ustanak. And put RE5 Wesker in.)
The campaign's kinda dodgy, but pro difficulty, no inf ammo, agent hunt enabled spices a lot of it up.
I would have liked to see more of the good.

That's respectable. You really gotta detache from the expectations the series set up. Even I thought I was gonna hate it when playing the demo. But I bought it day one anyway and immediately fell in love. It's really good you were able to give it another effort and strip awsy expectations. There's a few games I had to do that for before getting. I hated the first 10 hours of a couple of my favorite games.