Current Events > Yo why did Harry name his his daughter after Luna. Bitch wasn't even dead lol

(+) Yeah! (+)

I'm sure she was fine with it

He had an affair with her three years after he married Ginny and that was her price for keeping silent.

Guy isn't the brightest. Him naming his son albus and severus is stupid as shit. Dumbledore pretty much raised him like a pig for slaughter and Snape treated him like shit. Why would you name your kid after those people.

Guy isn't the brightest. Him naming his son albus and severus is stupid as shit. Dumbledore pretty much raised him like a pig for slaughter and Snape treated him like shit. Why would you name your kid after those people.

Guy isn't the brightest. Him naming his son albus and severus is stupid as shit. Dumbledore pretty much raised him like a pig for slaughter and Snape treated him like shit. Why would you name your kid after those people.

Realtalk, Harry should have ended up with Luna.

I will accept this headcanon. Realtalk, Harry should have ended up with Luna.

When characters have kids after a main plot is resolved has there ever been a time where absolutely none of them are named after another character?

Every example I can think of always has at least one. Especially if it's one of those 'next generation of heroes' type of thing.

You could tell me all of Deathly Hallows was written first and I would believe it.

I wouldn't. Despite the revisionist history people are trying to create, Rowling is a decent writer. If she'd written DH first, I think she'd have put some of that wandlore shit in the preceding books.

Horcruxes are a bullshit plot device that were never foreshadowed in any of the earlier books.

Harry is suddenly a Jesus figure for no reason.

That's just a lie. From the very beginning, how Voldemort survived a rebounded killing curse was a question. The diary was showcased in the second book. There was a reference to the locket in the fifth book. HBP was entirely about showing Voldemort's backstory and how he created them.

You really don't understand why the dude that beat Voldemort as a baby and fucked with him multiple times over the preceding years is considered the rallying savior?

All of your other points are whatever, but none of what you said is evidence that she wrote DH first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIexDBVjpic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIexDBVjpic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIexDBVjpic

The objects were present, yes, but at no point was it ever hinted at that they were going to be bigger plot objects.

When characters have kids after a main plot is resolved has there ever been a time where absolutely none of them are named after another character?

Every example I can think of always has at least one. Especially if it's one of those 'next generation of heroes' type of thing.

Until there was an entire book that had the sole purpose of revealing that they were.

I don't think you know what the word foreshadowing means.

That is....the opposite of foreshadowing.

The way you're talking seems like you think it should have been immediately obvious that these items were as important as they were. That's not foreshadowing, that's just exposition.

If they're going to be the major plot device for an entire book, yes, they should have been.

Would it be considered cultural appropriation if he named his daughter after his first crush?

Lily Cho doesn't have alliteration like Lily Luna, which we all know is the key factor for Rowling naming characters.

Except that's just dumb.

this was surprisingly funny but i don't get the ending >_>

It's basic writing. It would be like if Frodo made it to Mt. Doom and found out he had to turn back and go smash the Arkenstone as well. It would come out of nowhere and be unsatisfying because it's an object that already served its purpose for its respective story and at no point was ever hinted at to possess a greater relevance.

Except, as I said, there was an entire book explaining what the horcruxes were.

To use your LotR comparison, you're complaining that Bilbo's silly invisibility ring is suddenly this powerful artifact of a dark lord when the Hobbit didn't hint at that at all.

Which is bad. Because it's the same book that establishes they even exist and also exposits that they need to be destroyed to defeat the main villain. All in the final book of the series.

So you genuinely don't know what you're talking about because the horcruxes and Voldemort's backstory was in Half-Blood Prince, not in Deathly Hallows.