Poll of the Day > Depp won the defamation lawsuit with $8,350,000

(+) Yeah! (+)

Jen0125 posted...

that's a VERY interesting take lmfao you guys are truly lost

You and this Bongland trial. I supposed since Heard's testimony was closed door she couldn't make a fool of herself & you are under the bizzare impression that somehow despite what Depp said before & since he stated that he beat her in the UK trial (something supported by no evidence whatsoever). No wonder you love this thing.

ReturnOfFa posted...

I wouldn't be focusing on some stupid celebrity drama if I was in a happy relationship lol

....You understand people are multifaceted, right? People can do more than one thing. Is that a difficult concept?

Your posts are as brain-dead as it gets. What are you even doing here then? lol

it is completely hopeless with some of these guys lmao it's crazy. get off the internet and go touch grass.

he specifically was talking about himself, not other people

Jen0125 posted...

it is completely hopeless with some of these guys lmao it's crazy. get off the internet and go touch grass.

Says the person that is taking one of the more ludicrously contrarian takes on the trial I have seen. Talk to some of you coworkers about the trial. See how many agree with your absurd assessment. You think I am out of touch, me several hundred million others, I suppose.

thinking both people are shitty people for doing shitty things is a ludicrously contrarian take?

bro that is the default take

Jen0125 posted...

it is completely hopeless with some of these guys lmao it's crazy. get off the internet and go touch grass.

Uh... I'm the new guy here, but having just skimmed the topic, you probably posted more than everyone else. You're likely more invested than everyone else here. Your attempt at nonchalance is embarrassing.

jen doesn't even come fourth in this topic for posts

Adam_Savage posted...

thinking both people are shitty people for doing shitty things is a ludicrously contrarian take?

bro that is the default take

Thinking both are abusers, huge difference. Abuser gets you cancelled for life as a man, being a shitty person not so much. Especially when your take is based on Heard's testimony (the only evidence pointing to Depp as an abuser) which has been proven to be fraudulent it becomes more dubious.

DragonClaw01 posted...

the only evidence pointing to Depp as an abuser

and the uk court system

and depp himself

but they don't really count, huh

Adam_Savage posted...

and the uk court system

but they don't really count, huh

No it doesn't. It would violate several constitutional amendments in America & all rulings would be mistrials if its system was used in the US. So it is not much of a court system by our standards. Different laws too.

and yet it is still a court of law in a first world country

so yes, it very much does matter

the only reason it doesn't matter to you is because it is evidence that you are wrong

ZannoL posted...

Uh... I'm the new guy here, but having just skimmed the topic, you probably posted more than everyone else. You're likely more invested than everyone else here. Your attempt at nonchalance is embarrassing.

i mean i do care because people need to correct false info when they see it. the issue is when you're talking to a bunch of men who have been spouting incel rhetoric it's basically pointless because it's beyond reasoning

ZannoL posted...

....You understand people are multifaceted, right? People can do more than one thing. Is that a difficult concept?

Your posts are as brain-dead as it gets. What are you even doing here then? lol

Oh yeah, of course you're capable of doing multiple things at once! This one facet is something I consider very unappealing in people. You seem to extrapolate on what I have to say a fair bit. You're definitely very creative.

Jen0125 posted...

i already posted an article and i'm not posting it again. do your own research. you have unlimited information at your finger tips

i literally don't know how you can call what i'm doing in this topic "fleeting adherence to the truth" when you havent even bothered to actually learn the truth of what we know in this case?? lmfao it's so laughable.

Here's the article you posted and here's your quoted post. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54779430

Jen0125 posted...

Abusive language is abuse.

Him punching her in the face is abuse lol

Idk what you guys don't get about that. I fear for your partners.

The words punch or hit do not appear in the article once.

DragonClaw01 posted...

Thinking both are abusers, huge difference. Abuser gets you cancelled for life as a man, being a shitty person not so much. Especially when your take is based on Heard's testimony (the only evidence pointing to Depp as an abuser) which has been proven to be fraudulent it becomes more dubious.

if you care this much about either of them, you're f'd

Jen0125 posted...

i mean i do care because people need to correct false info when they see it. the issue is when you're talking to a bunch of men who have been spouting incel rhetoric it's basically pointless because it's beyond reasoning

You and that incel garbage. Still upset Heard lost?

sull56ivan2010 posted...

You and that incel garbage. Still upset Heard lost?

I mean, if you read anything Jen says about Heard, she offers no sympathy to her.

Guys look, there's a promo for Pirates 6!

https://youtu.be/h1zGqRXZlnY

sull56ivan2010 posted...

You and that incel garbage. Still upset Heard lost?

no i'm glad she lost. she's a toxic drug addicted abuser. i fully believe she was doing drugs on the stand. that's how addicted i think she is lmao. she is not sympathetic to me but neither is johnny depp because he gets drunk and abusive, he punched her in the face and he has his friends hurl abuse about her too. they're both cruel and abusive. i wish they would have left their trial private because i think they're sick involving us in their toxic drug addled drama.

is that clear enough???

Jen0125 posted...

no i'm glad she lost. she's an toxic drug addicted abuser. i fully believe she was doing drugs on the stand. that's how addicted i think she is lmao. she is not sympathetic to me but neither is johnny depp because he gets drunk and abusive, he punched her in the face and he has his friends hurl abuse about her too. they're both cruel and abusive. i wish they would have left their trial private because i think they're sick involving us in their toxic drug addled drama.

I fail to see how people do not relate to this being the most balanced take on this. lol.

Who's gonna cum to some Johnny tonight?

Revelation34 posted...

Here's the article you posted and here's your quoted post. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54779430

The words punch or hit do not appear in the article once.

Revelation34 posting the truth.

because it's coming from me. that's literally what it is. all i've done in this topic is take a completely neutral stance about this rich jerry springer episode and correct someone's misconceptions about trial procedures. but somehow i'm the bad guy for asking these guys to simply face the facts that johnny depp isn't an innocent angel beacon for men's rights. he's toxic and problematic. and so is she.

ZannoL posted...

Revelation34 posting the truth.

Why don't you two get into the details of the article if it's of such interest to you?
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/2/7/AAUdByAADV37.png

ReturnOfFa posted...

Why don't you two get into the details of the article if it's of such interest to you?
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/2/7/AAUdByAADV37.png

because it does not align with the reality they are crafting

Jen0125 posted...

is that clear enough???

Then why are you going on this MeToo rage?

Jen0125 posted...

because it's coming from me. that's literally what it is. all i've done in this topic is take a completely neutral stance about this rich jerry springer episode and correct someone's misconceptions about trial procedures. but somehow i'm the bad guy for asking these guys to simply face the facts that johnny depp isn't an innocent angel beacon for men's rights. he's toxic and problematic. and so is she.

You literally lied about what the article stated.

Adam_Savage posted...

and yet it is still a court of law in a first world country

so yes, it very much does matter

the only reason it doesn't matter to you is because it is evidence that you are wrong

Yeah, because Heard, the lead witness, spouting hearsay behind close doors is such a fair and effective practice. You don't think that testimony is going to be rife with bias. And if you think that her lying under oath is going to stop her, remember she lied about donating the 7 million under oath, so the oath isn't too much to her.

sull56ivan2010 posted...

Then why are going on this MeToo rage?

Your perception is fundamentally founded in your illiteracy.

Revelation34 posted...

You literally lied about what the article stated.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/2/7/AAUdByAADV37.png
Uh, you didn't find 'hit' or 'punch' in the article - do you care enough to look into these incidents cited in the court documents?

Jen0125 posted...

because it's coming from me. that's literally what it is. all i've done in this topic is take a completely neutral stance about this rich jerry springer episode and correct someone's misconceptions about trial procedures. but somehow i'm the bad guy for asking these guys to simply face the facts that johnny depp isn't an innocent angel beacon for men's rights. he's toxic and problematic. and so is she.

No one's saying he's an innocent angel. But it's justice since there's a lot of men who are framed for things that were not true. Look up Brian Banks. It can also happen to women as well.

sull56ivan2010 posted...

No one's saying he's an innocent angel. But it's justice since there's a lot of men who are framed for things that were not true. Look up Brian Banks. It can also happen to women as well.

You do understand that judging the law shouldn't be based on...completely different situations...correct? Jesus fucking Christ.

sull56ivan2010 posted...

Then why are you going on this MeToo rage?

how is it "me too" to simply ask you to acknowledge both parties are abusive

i dont even see why you would want to adopt a case as problematic as this to be your shining case of domestic abuse against men. there are unfortunately thousands of cases of domestic abuse against men that don't involve a male abuser. why don't you start shining a light on these cases?? it's really maddening that male victims of domestic abuse desperately need real support and this fleeting social media freakshow is not going to help in any way. it has damaged both causes for male and female domestic abuse.

it's crazy to me that people can't see that

if these two weren't rich this would be a trailer park drama that no one cares about.

Fat simps ITT thinking Amber will sleep with them. LOL. Most people know Amber was the abuser.

ReturnOfFa posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/2/7/AAUdByAADV37.png
Uh, you didn't find 'hit' or 'punch' in the article - do you care enough to look into these incidents cited in the court documents?

Why are you defending Jen lying?

i just want this topic to get to 500 and get locked at this point

Probably because dude is a virgin simp.

Revelation34 posted...

Why are you defending Jen lying?

Why don't you look a little closer into those '12 of the 14 incidents of domestic violence' before calling someone a liar? Either you understand the entire court case or you don't.

Awards posted...

Probably because dude is a virgin simp.

I only cum for Johnny.

ReturnOfFa posted...

Why don't you look a little closer into those '12 of the 14 incidents of domestic violence' before calling someone a liar? Either you understand the entire court case or you don't.

She claimed the article said he punched her in the face. That's a lie.

Amber Turd