Current Events > Your reaction: A guy you hate crushes your daughter's leg and faces 0 punishment

(+) Yeah! (+)

You spent all that time making up a "bad" scenario topic

but yet still can't give an example of what you would consider to be a good one despite claiming it should be easy and realistic

nor you could you respond to the basic questions I asked throughout the topic

Gobstoppers12 posted...

I think the problem here is that you're assessing your own writing to be interesting even though we're telling you it's not interesting. You're stubbornly asserting that you're offering a "stimulating" scenario, but your audience is saying..."No, no you aren't."

Kinda arrogant to assume you alone are "my target audience " and therefore anything creative or not plain dull is wrong

You've already flat out said that you hate thinking and you hate scenario topics

Now you're claiming to be the target audience for them... in-between rants about fetishism and gimmicks.

might want to try a second draft, it's hard to keep track of what you're even trying to say

UnfairRepresent posted...

but yet still can't give an example of what you would consider to be a good one despite claiming it should be easy and realistic

Did I say it would be easy? No. No I did not.

UnfairRepresent posted...

You've already flat out said that you hate thinking and you hate scenario topics

False. Now you're just lying. I said I think reaction topics are vapid, but I've never once claimed to "hate thinking."

UnfairRepresent posted...

in-between rants about fetishism and gimmicks

It's just weird that within ~one week you've made two different topics about "your daughter losing her leg" and in each topic there was an image of a different "sexy" woman with one leg. Why do you have those images? Why are you using clearly-sexualized posing for the example that's supposed to be your daughter?

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kinda arrogant to assume you alone are "my target audience "

Do you read your own topics? I'm not the only one calling them bad, lol

UnfairRepresent posted...

it's hard to keep track of what you're even trying to say

You shouldn't tell on yourself like this, tbh

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Did I say it would be easy? No. No I did not.

False. Now you're just lying. I said I think reaction topics are vapid, but I've never once claimed to "hate thinking."

You're splitting hairs and being hyperliteral

It's just weird that within ~one week you've made two different topics about "your daughter losing her leg" and in each topic there was an image of a different "sexy" woman with one leg. Why do you have those images? Why are you using clearly-sexualized posing for the example that's supposed to be your daughter?

You just switched horses

First you falsely complained that I spent hours online searching for images

Now you're complaining that I used images immediately to hand instead of spending hours looking for more appropriate ones

You can pick one complaint but not both.

Guess what, girls who parade selfies online try to look good in them. Blaming me for that as if it is my doing is wacky

Do you read your own topics? I'm not the only one calling them bad, lol

You're the only person I've ever seen suggesting making hypothetical scenarios that are hyper realistic and dull.

So much so that you can't even give an example of one because it's far too difficult for you

meanwhile you claim to be the target audience of something you profess to hating

I love discussion and constructive criticism but this seems more akin to talking to Cleverbot

You shouldn't tell on yourself like this, tbh

wut

Case and point

UnfairRepresent posted...

First you falsely complained that I spent hours online searching for images

I was talking about Vegy, dude. This is what I meant when I said you shouldn't tell on yourself.

You have to read the whole discussion. The entire topic. You have to comprehend the message being delivered. You have to think (Mark, think) before you respond to people. I was talking about Vegy and his need for images to fuel his gimmick several times a day. You and Vegy are very, very similar in that you both constantly post topics with a repeated, paper-thin format/premise, day in and day out. You don't have quite as many images as Vegy does, but you do come up with some weird ones, lemme tell ya.

As for wanting hyper realistic and dull topics...Nobody said "hyper-realistic and dull." That's your extrapolation of the subject. What was really said was: "zany cartoon wackiness isn't plausible." There's a pretty big gap between "bread and driving to work" and "literal cartoon villainy ensues"

UnfairRepresent posted...

meanwhile you claim to be the target audience of something you profess to hating

I'm not just referring to me, though. Look through the topic, man. Come on. You have to have seen these posts:

Paragon21XX posted... I'm summoning the men in white coats to your location, TC, because...yikes.

Sir_Gawain posted...

Is this some weird fetish UR

Alucard188 posted...

Why do you insist on making such stupid topics?

Mr_Karate_II posted...

When a mod calls you out for making stupid topics you know it's a stupid topic

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

This is a weird fetish topic creator, please seek help.

Yeah maybe you're right

Thus topic is kinda dumb

I'm really not seeing the sexy side you are seeing tho. That's fucking weird and I think says more about you fellas honestly

Gobstoppers12 posted...

You don't have quite as many images as Vegy does, but you do come up with some weird ones, lemme tell ya.

most of my images are from news articles or social media. Often the topics are inspired by the photo

They're "weird" Exactly because I don't do what you're mad at this vegy guy for doing and hunt pics to get perfect matches

And I maintain that you complaining about both simultaneously is having your cake and eating it too. You kinda have to pick one complaint or the other

UnfairRepresent posted...

this vegy guy

Don't act like you don't know who vegy is, lol. He's one of the most prolific shitposters on CE.

UnfairRepresent posted...

You kinda have to pick one complaint or the other

The complaint that applies to both of you is the repetition of boring, gimmicky topics that pop up on a daily or near-daily basis. Vegy is the one who spends a disproportionate amount of time combing the internet for random images of women to act creepy with.

You have fewer images (but still weird ones) and spend more time on writing contrived, meme-ridden scenarios that don't make sense and have little to no substance.

Different flavors of the same ice cream, as far as I'm concerned. You're both gimmick-posters.

I think you just babble the word gimmick when you don't know what else to say like a Smurf

And sorry but no, I don't know who vegy is

I barely keep track of any users

Again I think you struggle to comprehend any perspective that isn't you own. You thinking or knowing something does not mean everyone else will think or know the same

I think you really could learn a lot from listening to hypotheticals and seeing what different people say about the same situation and they have different lives and different backgrounds and different knowledge

You come across as super rigid and close minded

UnfairRepresent posted...

I think you really could learn a lot from listening to hypotheticals and seeing what different people say about the same situation

This might be true in a general sense.

But I'm not gonna learn anything from yours, lol

Well on that we agree because I tried about 13 times to ask you probing questions to get you to think about things a little

While you ignored every single one and instead went on weird non focused inconsistent rants that required no thought at all

That's not how I can teach people anything

TC did you push the piano onto Gobstoppers' daughter? Vice versa?

UnfairRepresent posted...

That's not how I can teach people anything

I feel like you have some kind of mentor-complex, where you think you're posting thought-provoking content but it's actually just incoherent rambling. You're not going to teach anybody anything with a topic like this (or any others I've seen you post recently)

They're not thought-provoking. They don't ask difficult questions. They provoke surface-level reactions that show very little variation from one person to the next.

You seem to be assuming that I ignored your questions because I don't want to think, while the real reason I disregarded your questions is because the answers are borderline common knowledge.

ViewtifulJoe posted...

TC did you push the piano onto Gobstoppers' daughter? Vice versa?

I don't hate UR, I just think his gimmick is silly. I assumed he was in on the joke, but if he actually thinks people take his topics seriously and that they're "interesting," I owe him the favor of snapping him back to reality.

I feel a duty to address something that was glanced over so horribly.

Doe posted...

Can you explain why Nemesis is shit without spoiling it I've only seen First Contact

Dune buggies. Capt. Picard and his crazy dune buggy stunt drivin extravanganza. Wait. That may have made you want to see this one.

Vigilante justice.

Devilanse333 posted...

I feel a duty to address something that was glanced over so horribly.

Dune buggies. Capt. Picard and his crazy dune buggy stunt drivin extravanganza. Wait. That may have made you want to see this one.

That scene was bad but the entire film is terrible save for the opening scene

Gobstoppers12 posted...

I don't hate UR, I just think his gimmick is silly. I assumed he was in on the joke, but if he actually thinks people take his topics seriously and that they're "interesting," I owe him the favor of snapping him back to reality.

And you thought a piano to his daughter's leg was the way to go? During an earthquake!?

ViewtifulJoe posted...

And you thought a piano to his daughter's leg was the way to go? During an earthquake!?

After an earthquake, if you must know.